Everyday experiences of illness draw our attention to the importance of the cosmopolitics of care in and through which normalizing and normalized practices of care can neither be taken for granted nor be expected. Drawing on ethnographic work on issues of everyday care practices in heath care this article argues that caring relations demand an attentiveness to the emerging requirements of care in concrete situations. Shared policy rules are beneficial if they allow policy practitioners to respond adequately to the unfolding issues, requirements and obligations of care practices. The article suggests that an ethnographic sense of and for caring practices may offer important insights that contribute to health care policy making processes.
AndersonP.HeinleinM. (2003). Ein Blick in die Alltagspraxis im Pflegeheim: Über Möglichkeiten einer praxisnahen Form von Kundenorientierung [Every day practices of a nursing home: On practice-oriented forms of customer orientation]. In SingD.KistlerE. (Eds.), Lernfeld Altenpflege: Praxisprojekte zur Verbesserung der Dienstleistung an und mit alten Menschen [Learning about care for the elderly: Practice-oriented projects to improve the services with and for the elderly] (pp. 81–97). Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
2.
BarnesM.BrannellyT.WardL.WardN. (Eds.). (2015). Ethics of care: Critical advances in international perspectives. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
3.
BartlettP. (Ed.). (1999). Outside the walls of care of the asylum: The history of care in the community 1750–2000: on care in the community in modern Britain and Ireland. London, UK: Athlone Press.
4.
BorsayA. (2005). Disability and social policy in Britain since 1750: A history of exclusion. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
5.
DeleuzeG. (1992). Expressionism in philosophy: Spinoza. New York, NY: Zone Books.
6.
DunkelW.VoßG. G. (Eds.). (2004). Dienstleistung als Interaktion [Service as interaction]. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
7.
FrancisR. (2013). Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
8.
FoucaultM. (2009 [1972]). History of madness. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
9.
HarperS.HamblinK. (Eds.). (2016). International handbook on aging and public policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
10.
HeideggerM. (1962). Being and time. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
11.
HeinleinM. (2003). Pflege in Aktion: Zur Materialität alltäglicher Pflegepraxis [Care in action: On the materiality of everyday practices of care]. Munich, Germany: Rainer Hampp.
12.
LatimerJ. (2000). The conduct of care: Understanding nursing practices. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
LatourB. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimensions of science studies. Body & Society, 10, 205–229.
15.
LloydL. (2012). Health and care in ageing societies: A new international approach. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
16.
MilliganC. (2009). There’s no place like home: Place and care in an ageing society. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
17.
MolA. M. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
18.
MolA.MoserI.PolsJ. (Eds.). (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript
19.
Puig de la BellacasaM. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41, 86–106.
20.
SchillmeierM. (2013). Realities to be–come – on cosmopolitics. Informática Na Educação: Teoria e Prática, 16, 101–122.
21.
SchillmeierM. (2014). Eventful bodies: The cosmopolitics of illness. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
22.
SchillmeierM. (2015). Caring about social complexity in nanomedicine. Nanomedicine, 10, 3181–3193.
23.
SchillmeierM. (2017). Social studies of nanopharmacy. In CornierJ.OwenA.KwadeA.van de VoordeM. (Eds.), Pharmaceutical nanotechnology: Innovation and production (pp. 521–531). Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH.
24.
SchillmeierM.DomenèchM. (Eds.). (2010). New technologies and emerging spaces of care. London, UK: Routledge.
25.
SchweigerP. (2011). ‘Wir haben zwar Geduld, aber keine Zeit’ – Eine Ethnographie subjektiver Arbeitsstile in der ökonomisierten Altenpflege [‘We have patience, but no time’ – An ethnography of subjective styles of work within the economy of elderly care]. München, Germany: Utz.
26.
StengersI. (2005). The cosmopolitical proposal. In LatourB.WeibelP. (Eds.), Making things public: Atmospheres of democracy (pp. 994–1003). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27.
StengersI. (2010). Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
TritterJ.KoivusaloM.OllilaE.DorfmanP. (2010). Globalisation, markets and healthcare policy: Redrawing the patient as consumer. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
29.
WeichtB. (2015). The meaning of care: The social construction of care for elderly people. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
WhiteheadA. N. (1968 [1938]). Modes of thought. New York, NY: The Free Press.
31.
WhiteheadA. N. (1978 [1929]). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (rev. ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
