Based on ethnographic research in Harpurhey, Manchester, in the northwest of England, this article addresses the emergence of a moral economy of personhood amongst some of the poorest people in Britain today. Specifically, the article studies how new conceptions of the viable and worthy person emerge in the practice of borrowing and lending money between neighbours, as a sort of ‘safety net’ in times of financial precarity and social stigma. The humiliation experienced regularly by people who need state support to make ends meet is responded to in the local prioritization of what it means to ‘be fair’ and to express and recognize the worthy self in negotiating the terms of a loan. It is in the process of negotiation that we can see in a new light what is being responded to and fought for in the face of stigma and precarity. Despite experiencing an ever-increasing threat of poverty and destitution, we see worthy selves, fair persons, and the creation of an alternative space of hope in which social and personal worth can be expressed and recognized.
AdairV. (2002). Branded with infamy: Inscriptions of poverty and class in the United States. Signs, 27, 451–471.
2.
BlochM.ParryJ. (1989). Introduction: Money and the morality of exchange. In BlochM.ParryJ. (Eds.), Money and the morality of exchange (pp. 1–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BoltonS. C.LaaserK. (2013). Work, employment and society through the lens of moral economy. Work, Employment and Society, 27, 508–525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0950017013479828
4.
ButlerJ. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
CarrithersM.CollinsS.LukesS. (Eds.). (1985). The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
ChaseE.WalkerR. (2012). The co-construction of shame in the context of poverty: Beyond a threat to the social bond. Sociology, 47, 739–754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038512453796
8.
CohenA. P. (2000). Peripheral vision: Nationalism, national identity and the objective correlative in Scotland. In CohenA. P. (Ed.), Signifying identities: Anthropological perspectives on boundaries and contested values (pp. 145–169). New York, NY: Routledge.
9.
CollinsC.WrightM. (2007). The moral measure of the economy. New York, NY: Orbis Books.
10.
de L’EstoileB. (2014). ‘Money is good, but a friend is better’: Uncertainty, orientation to the future, and the economy. Current Anthropology, 55, S62–S73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676068
HackingI. (1986). Making up people. In HellerT. C.SosnaM.WellberyD. E. (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality and the self in Western thought (pp. 222–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
HyattS. B. (1997). Poverty in a ‘post-welfare’ landscape. In ShoreC.WrightS. (Eds.), Anthropology of policy: Critical perspectives on governance and power (pp. 217–238). London, UK: Routledge.
15.
HyattS. B. (2011). What was neoliberalism and what comes next? The transformation of citizenship in the law-and-order state. In ShoreC.WrightS.PeróD. (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power, EASA Monographs, 14 (pp. 105–123). Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
16.
JosephidesL. (2008). Melanesian odysseys: Negotiating the self, narrative and modernity. Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
17.
LambekM. (2013). The continuous and discontinuous person: Two dimensions of ethical life. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.), 19, 837–858. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467–9655.12073
MacDonaldR.ShildrickT.FurlongA. (2014). ‘Benefits Street’ and the myth of workless communities. Sociological Research Online, 19, 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.3438
20.
McdonaldC.MarstonG. (2005). Workfare as welfare: Governing unemployment in the advanced liberal state. Critical Social Policy, 25, 374–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018305054077
21.
MorgenS.MaskovskyJ. (2003). The anthropology of welfare ‘reform’: New perspectives on U.S. urban poverty in the post-welfare era. Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, 315–338.
22.
NarotzkyS. (2016). Between inequality and injustice: Dignity as a motive for mobilization during the crisis. History and Anthropology, 27, 74–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02757206.2015.1111209
23.
NarotzkyS.BesnierN. (2014). Crisis, value and hope: Rethinking the economy. Current Anthropology, 55(S9), S4–S16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/676327
RapportN. (2012). Anyone: The cosmopolitan subject of anthropology. Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
26.
RapportN. (2014). The capacities of anyone: Accommodating the universal human subject as value and in space. In JosephidesL.HallA. (Eds.), We the cosmopolitans: Moral and existential conditions of being human (pp. 48–67). Oxford, UK: Berghahn.
SalesR. (2002). The deserving and undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain. Critical Social Policy, 22, 456–478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026101830202200305
30.
SassenS.Van Roekel-HughesA. (2008). Deciphering the global: Its spaces, scales and subjects. Social Thought & Research, 29, 3–18. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23250060
31.
ShoreC.WrightS. (Eds.) (1997). Anthropology of policy: Critical perspectives on governance and power. London, UK: Routledge.
32.
SkeggsB. (2012). Struggles for value: Value practices, injustice, judgment, affect and the idea of class. The British Journal of Sociology, 63, 472–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–4446.2012.01420.x
33.
SlaterT. (2012). The myth of ‘Broken Britain’: Welfare reform and the production of ignorance. Antipode, 46, 948–969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/anti.12002
34.
SmithK. (2012). Fairness, class and belonging in contemporary England. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
SmithK. (2017). Self-policing as ethical development. In LewisC.SymonsJ. (Eds.), Realising the city: Ethnographic narratives of urban transformation in Manchester. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
36.
StackC. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
TylerI. (2013). Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain. London, UK: Zed Books.
39.
WedelJ. R.ShoreC.FeldmanG.LathropS. (2005). Toward an anthropology of public policy. Annals of the American Academy, 600, 30–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276734
