This article presents an innovative approach to improve the power of questionnaires by combining them with weekly diaries. The aim is to show how one can calibrate information collected from questionnaires, which provide a distribution that is in general biased, with diary data, which are more accurate but cannot provide a distribution across a range of frequencies. These problems become even more pronounced when the object of analysis is a specific issue, such as religious practice, the focus of this study. The suggested user-friendly model uses the more accurate diary data to adjust the distribution produced by the standard questions and enables researchers to obviate the problems of the two data collection methods. To present a practical application, the Time Budget Survey, conducted at five-year intervals between 1975 and 2005 in the Netherlands, is used.
Al BaghalTarekBelliRobert F.PhillipsA. LynnRutherNicholas. 2014. “What Are You Doing Now? Activity-Level Responses and Recall Failures in the American Time Use Survey.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology2(4):519–37.
2.
AxhausenKay W.ZimmermannAndreaSchönfelderStefanRindsfüserGuidoHauptThomas. 2002. “Observing the Rhythms of Daily Life: A Six-Week Travel Diary.” Transportation29(2):95–124.
3.
BartaWilliam D.TennenHowardLittMark D. 2012. “Measurement Reactivity in Diary Research.” Pp. 108–23 in Handbook of Research Methods for Studying Daily Life, Vol. 23, edited by MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. New York: Guilford.
4.
BelliRobert F.1998. “The Structure of Autobiographical Memory and the Event History Calendar: Potential Improvements in the Quality of Retrospective Reports in Surveys.” Memory6(4):383–406.
5.
BelliRobert F.CallegaroMario. 2009. “The Emergence of Calendar Interviewing: A Theoretical and Empirical Rationale.” Pp. 31–52 in Calendar and Time Diary Methods in Life Course Research, edited by BelliR. F.StaffordF. P.DuaneA. F. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
BolgerNiallDavisAngelinaRafaeliEshkol. 2003. “Diary Methods: Capturing Life as It Is Lived.” Annual Review of Psychology54(1):579–616.
7.
BorraCristinaSevillaAlmudenaGershunyJonathan. 2013. “Calibrating Time-Use Estimates for the British Household Panel Survey.” Social Indicators Research114(3):1211–24.
8.
BrennerPhilip S.2011. “Identity Importance and the Overreporting of Religious Service Attendance: Multiple Imputation of Religious Attendance Using the American Time Use Study and the General Social Survey.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50(1):103–15.
9.
BrennerPhilip S.DeLamaterJohn. 2016. “Measurement Directiveness as a Cause of Response Bias Evidence from Two Survey Experiments.” Sociological Methods & Research45(2):348–71.
10.
BruceSteve. 2016. “The Sociology of Late Secularization: Social Divisions and Religiosity.” British Journal of Sociology67(4):613–31.
11.
BrunnerEricStalloneDarythJunejaManeeshBinghamSheilaMarmotMichael. 2001. “Dietary Assessment in Whitehall II: Comparison of 7 d Diet Diary and Food-Frequency Questionnaire and Validity against Biomarkers.” British Journal of Nutrition86(3):405–14.
12.
EagleDavid E.2011. “Changing Patterns of Attendance at Religious Services in Canada, 1986–2008.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion50(1):187–200.
13.
FrazisHarleyStewartJay. 2012. “How to Think about Time-Use Data: What Inferences Can We Make about Long- and Short-Run Time Use from Time Diaries?”Annals of Economic and Statistics 105/106:231–45.
14.
GershunyJonathan. 2003. Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
GershunyJonathan. 2012. “Too Many Zeros: A Method for Estimating Long-Term Time-Use from Short Diaries.” Annals of Economic and Statistics 105/106:247–70.
16.
HadawayC. KirkMarlerPenny Long. 2005. “How Many Americans Attend Worship Each Week? An Alternative Approach to Measurement.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion44(3):307–22.
17.
HadawayC. KirkMarlerPenny LongChavesMark. 1993. “What the Pools Don’t Show: A Closer Look at U.S. Church Attendance.” American Sociological Review58(6):741–52.
18.
HadawayC. KirkMarlerPenny LongChavesMark. 1998. “Overreporting Church Attendance in America: Evidence That Demands the Same Verdict.” American Political Science Review63(1):122–30.
19.
HansonSusanHansonPerry. 1981. “The Travel-Activity Patterns of Urban Residents: Dimensions and Relationships to Sociodemographic Characteristics.” Economic Geography57(4):332–47.
20.
HarmsTeresaGershunyJonathanDohertyAidenThomasEmmaMiltonKarenFosterCharlie. 2019. “A Validation Study of the Eurostat Harmonised European Time Use Study (HETUS) Diary Using Wearable Technology.” BMC Public Health 19(Suppl. 2):455
21.
HarveyAndrew S.1993. “Guidelines for Time Use Data Collection.” Social Indicators Research30:197–228.
22.
HayLinda RudinHayWilliam M.AngleHugh V. 1977. “The Reactivity of Self Recording: A Case Report of a Drug Abuser.” Behavior Therapy8(5):1004–7.
23.
HoutMichaelGreeleyAndrew M. 1998. “What Church Officials’ Reports Don’t Show: Another Look at Church Attendance Data.” American Sociological Review63(1):113–19.
24.
JacobsJerry A.1998. “Measuring Time at Work: Are Self-Reports Accurate?”Monthly Labor Review121(12):42–53.
25.
JansenGiedoGraafNan Dirk DeNeedAriana. 2012. “Explaining the Breakdown of the Religion–Vote Relationship in the Netherlands, 1971–2006.” West European Politics35(4):756–83.
26.
JusterF. ThomasOnoHiromiStaffordFrank P. 2003. “An Assessment of Alternative Measures of Time Use.” Sociological Methodology33(1):19–54.
27.
KanMan YeeGershunyJonathan. 2006. “Infusing Time Diary Evidence into Panel Data: An Exercise in Calibrating Time-Use Estimates for the BHPS.” Colchester: University of Essex. Retrieved May10, 2020. http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/pubs/workpaps/.
28.
KanMan YeeGershunyJonathan. 2009. “Calibrating Stylised Time Estimates Using UK Diary Data.” Social Indicators Research93(1):239–43.
29.
KanMan YeePudneyStephen. 2008. “Measurement Error in Stylized and Diary Data on Time Use.” Sociological Methodology38(1):101–32.
30.
KnippenbergHans. 2015. “Secularization and Transformation of Religion in Post-war Europe.” Pp. 2101–27 in The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics, Vol. 4, edited by S. D.Brunn. New York: Springer.
31.
KorotitschWilliam J.Nelson-GrayRosemery O. 1999. “An Overview of Self-Monitoring Research in Assessment and Treatment.” Psychological Assessment11(4):415–25.
32.
LechnerFrank J.1996. “Secularization in the Netherlands?”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion35(3):252–64.
33.
MandemakersJornt J.RoetersAnne. 2014. “Fast or Slow Food? Explaining Trends in Food-Related Time in the Netherlands, 1975–2005.” Acta Sociologica58(2):121–37.
34.
OtterbachSteffenSousa-PozaAlfonso. 2010. “How Accurate Are German Work-Time Data? A Comparison of Time-Diary Reports and Stylized Estimates.” Social Indicators Research97(3):325–39.
35.
PresserStanleyChavesMark. 2007. “Is Religious Service Attendance Declining?”Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion46(3):417–23.
36.
PresserStanleyStinsonLinda. 1998. “Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reported Religious Attendance.” American Sociological Review63(1):137–45.
37.
RobinsonJohn P.1985. “The Validity and Reliability of Diaries versus Alternative Time Use Measures.” Pp. 33–62 in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by JusterF. T.StaffordF. P. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
38.
RossiMaurizioScappiniEttore. 2012. “How Should Mass Attendance Be Measured? An Italian Case Study.” Quality & Quantity46(6):1897–916.
39.
RossiMaurizioScappiniEttore. 2014. “Church Attendance, Problems of Measurement, and Interpreting Indicators: A Study of Religious Practice in the United States, 1975–2010.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion53(2):249–67.
40.
ScappiniEttore. 2010. “Daily Diaries in Time Use Surveys: A Solution to Overcome Measurement Problems in Single-Activity Events with Long Characteristic Rhythms.” Quality & Quantity44(5):915–39.
41.
ShiffmanSaulStoneArthur A.HuffordMichael R. 2008. “Ecological Momentary Assessment.” Annual Review of Clinical Psychology4:1–32.
42.
TownshendJ. M.DukaT. 2002. “Patterns of Alcohol Drinking in a Population of Young Social Drinkers: A Comparison of Questionnaire and Diary Measures.” Alcohol & Alcoholism37(2):187–92.
VereeckenCarine A.MaesLea. 2003. “A Belgian Study on the Reliability and Relative Validity of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Food-Frequency Questionnaire.” Public Health Nutrition6(6):581–88.
45.
VoasDavidChavesMark. 2016. “Is the United States a Counterexample to the Secularization Thesis?”American Journal of Sociology121(5):1517–56.
46.
WalpoleRonald E.MyersRaymond H.MyersSharon L.YeKeying. 2012. Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. 9th ed.New York: Prentice Hall.
47.
WaltheryPierreGershunyJonathan. 2019. “Improving Stylised Working Time Estimates with Time Diary Data: A Multi Study Assessment for the UK.” Social Indicators Research144(3):1303–21.
48.
WoodberryRobert D.1998. “When Surveys Lie and People Tell the Truth: How Surveys Oversample Church Attenders.” American Sociological Review63(1):119–22.
