ClarkeKevin A.2005. “The Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Econometric Research.” Conflict Management and Peace Science22:341–52.
2.
ClarkeKevin A.2009. “Return of the Phantom Menace: Omitted Variable Bias in Political Research.” Conflict Management and Peace Studies26:46–66.
3.
ElwertFelixWinshipChristopher. 2014. “Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable.” Annual Review of Sociology40:31–53.
4.
GelmanAndrewLokenEric. 2014. “The Statistical Crisis in Science: Data-Dependent Analysis—a ‘Garden of Forking Paths’—Explains Why Many Statistically Significant Comparison Don’t Hold Up.” American Scientist102:460–65.
5.
HernánMiguel A.Hernández-DíazSoniaRobinsJames M.2004. “A Structural Approach to Selection Bias.” Epidemiology15:615–25.
6.
MuñozJohnCristobalYoung. 2018. “We Ran 9 Billion Regressions: Eliminating False Positives through Computational Model Robustness.” Sociological Methodology48:XX–XX.
7.
O’BrienRobert M.2017. “Dropping Highly Collinear Variables from a Model: Why It Typically Is Not a Good Idea.” Social Science Quarterly98:360–75.
8.
SlezAdam. 2017. “The Difference between Instability and Uncertainty: Comment on Young and Holsteen.” Sociological Methodology and Research. doi:10.1177/0049124117729704
9.
StockardJeanO’BrienRobert M.2002. “Cohort Variations and Changes in Age-specific Suicide Rates over Time: Explaining Variations in Youth Suicide.” Social Forces81:605–42.
10.
YoungCristobal. 2009. “Model Uncertainty in Sociological Research: An Application to Religion and Economic Growth.” American Sociological Review74:380–97.
11.
YoungCristobal. Forthcoming. “Model Uncertainty and the Crisis in Science.” Socius.
12.
YoungCristobalHolsteenKatherine. 2017. “Model Uncertainty and Robustness: A Computational Framework for Multi-model Analysis.” Sociological Methods and Research46:3–40.
