AbbottAndrew. 2000. “Reply to Levine and Wu.” Sociological Methods and Research29:65–76.
2.
AbbottAndrew. 2001a. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3.
AbbottAndrew. 2001b. Time Matters: On Theory and Method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
AbbottAndrewDe VineyStanley. 1992. “The Welfare State as Transnational Event: Evidence from Sequences of Policy Adoption.” Social Science History16(2):245–74.
5.
AbbottAndrewTsayAngela. 2000. “Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology.” Sociological Methods and Research29(1):3–33.
6.
AisenbreySilkeFasangAnette E. 2010. “New Life for Old Ideas: The ‘Second Wave’ of Sequence Analysis Bringing the ‘Course’ Back into the Life Course.” Sociological Methods and Research38(3):420–62.
7.
BenzécriJean-Paul. 1973. L’Analyse des Données. Paris, France: Dunod.
8.
BillariFrancesco. 2001. “Sequence Analysis in Demographic Research.” Canadian Studies in Population28(2):439–58.
9.
BryantChristopher. 1989. “Le Positivisme Instrumental dans la Sociologie Américaine.” Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales78(1):64–74.
10.
CiboisPhilippe. 1981. “Analyse des Données et Sociologie.” L’Année Sociologique31:333–48.
11.
ElzingaCees H.StuderMatthias. 2015. “Spell Sequences, State Proximities, and Distance Metrics.” Sociological Methods and Research44(1):3–47.
FabianiJean-Louis. 2003. “Pour en Finir avec la Réalité Unilinéaire. Le Parcours Méthodologique de Andrew Abbott.” Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales58(3):549–65.
14.
HalpinBrendanChanTak Wing. 1998. “Class Careers as Sequences: An Optimal Matching Analysis of Work-life Histories.” European Sociological Review14(2):111–30.
15.
LevineJoel H. 2000. “But What Have You Done for Us Lately? Commentary on Abbott and Tsay.” Sociological Methods and Research29(1):34–40.
16.
MillsCharles W. 1959. The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
PailhéArianeRobetteNicolasSolazAnne. 2013. “Work and Family over the Life Course: A Typology of French Long-lasting Couples Using Optimal Matching.” Longitudinal and Life Course Studies4(3):196–217.
18.
PasseronJean-Claude. 1991. Le Raisonnement Sociologique: L’Espace Non-poppérien du Raisonnement Naturel. Paris, France: Nathan.
19.
PiccarretaRaffaellaElzingaCees H. 2013. “Mining for Associations between Life Course Domains.” Pp. 190–98 in Contemporary Issues in Exploratory Data Mining, edited by McArdleJ. J.RitschardG. New York: Routledge.
20.
PiccarretaRaffaellaLiorOrna. 2010. “Exploring Sequences: A Graphical Tool Based on Multi-dimensional Scaling.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A173(1):165–84.
21.
RobetteNicolas. Forthcoming. “Du Prosélytisme à la Sécularisation. Le Processus de Diffusion de l’‘Optimal Matching Analysis.’” In Andrew Abbott, Sociologue de Chicago, edited by JouvenetM.DemazièreD. Paris, France: Editions de l’EHESS.
22.
RobetteNicolasBryXavier. 2012. “Harpoon or Bait? A Comparison of Various Metrics in Fishing for Sequence Patterns.” Bulletin of Sociological Methodology116(1):5–24.
23.
RouanetHenryLépineDominique. 1976. “A Propos de ‘l’Analyse des Données’ Selon Benzécri: Présentation et Commentaires.” L’Année Psychologique76(1):133–44.
24.
StuderMatthias. 2012. “Étude des Inégalités de Genre en Début de Carrière Académique à l’Aide de Méthodes Innovatrices d’Analyse de Données Séquentielles.” PhD dissertation, Faculté des Sciences Économiques et Sociales, Université de Genève.
25.
StuderMatthiasRitschardGilbert. 2014. “A Comparative Review of Sequence Dissimilarity Measures.” LIVES Working Papers 33. Lausanne, Switzerland: NCCR LIVES.
26.
StuderMatthiasRitschardGilbertGabadinhoAlexisMüllerNicolas. 2011. “Discrepancy Analysis of State Sequences.” Sociological Methods and Research40(3):471–510.
27.
TukeyJohn W. 1962. “The Future of Data Analysis.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics33(1):1–67.
28.
WilliamsW. T.LanceG. N. 1965. “Logic of Computer-based Intrinsic Classifications.” Nature207(4993):159–61.
29.
WuLawrence L. 2000. “Some Comments on ‘Sequence Analysis and Optimal Matching Methods in Sociology: Review and Prospect.”’ Sociological Methods and Research29(1):41–64.