Although there has been much optimistic discussion of integrating quantitative and qualitative findings into sociological analysis, there remains a gap regarding the application of mixed approaches. We examine the potential gains and pitfalls of such integration in the context of the growing analytic power of contemporary qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) programs. We illustrate the issues with our own research in a mixed-methods project examining low fertility in Italy, a project that combines analysis of large nationally representative survey data with qualitative in-depth interviews with women across four cities in Italy. Despite the enthusiasm for mixed-methods research, the available software appears to be underutilized. In addition, we suggest that the sociological research community will want to address several conceptual and inferential issues with these approaches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbellP.1987. The Syntax of Social Life: The Theory and Method of Comparative Narratives. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
2.
AbellP.2004. “Narrative Explanation: An Alternative to Variable-Centered Explanation?” Annual Review of Sociology30:287–310.
3.
AbbottA.1992. “From Causes to Events: Notes on Narrative Positivism. Sociological Research and Methods20:428–55.
4.
AbbottA.1995. “Sequence Analysis: New Methods for Old Ideas.” Annual Review of Sociology21: 93–113.
5.
AdamsonJ.Gooberman-HillR.WoolheadG.DonovanJ.2004. “Questerviews: Using Questionnaires in Qualitative Interviews as a Methods of Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Health Services Research.” Journal of Health Services Research and Policy9(3):139–45.
6.
AndrewS.SalamonsonY.HalcombE. J.2008. “Integrating Mixed Methods Data Analysis Using NVivo: An Example Examining Attrition and Persistence of Nursing Students.” International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches2:36–43.
7.
ArièsP.1980. “Two Successive Motivations for the Declining Birth Rate in the West.” Population and Development Review6(4):645–50.
8.
AxinnW. G.PearceL. D.2006. Mixed Method Data Collection Strategies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BazeleyP.1999. “The Bricoleur with a Computer: Piecing Together Qualitative and Quantitative Data.” Qualitative Health Research9(2):279–87.
10.
BazeleyP.2003. “Computerized Data Analysis for Mixed Methods Research.” Pp. 385-422 in Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
BazeleyP.2004. “Issues in Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches to Research.” Pp. 141–56 in Applying Qualitative Methods to Marketing Management Research, edited by BuberR.GadnerJ.Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
BazeleyP.2006. “The Contribution of Computer Software to Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data Analysis.” Research in the Schools13(1):64–74.
13.
BazeleyP.2007. Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. London: Sage.
14.
BazeleyP.2009. “Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research” [editorial]. Journal of Mixed Methods Research3(3):203–07.
15.
BazeleyP.2010. “Computer Assisted Integration of Mixed Methods Data Sources and Analyses.” Pp. 431–67 in Handbook of Mixed Methods Research for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
BazeleyP.KempL.2012. “Mosaics, Triangles, and DNA: Metaphors for Integrated Analysis in Mixed Methods Rresearch.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research6(1):55–72.
17.
BearmanP.StovelK.2000. “Becoming a Nazi: A Model for Narrative Networks.” Poetics27:69–90.
18.
BouchardT. J.1976. “Unobtrusive Measures: An Inventory of Uses.” Sociological Metlhods and Research4:267–300.
19.
BourdonS.2002. “The Integration of Qualitative Data Analysis Software in Research Strategies: Resistances and Possibilities.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research3(2):Art. 11.
20.
BrymanA.2006a. “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done?” Qualitative Research6(1):97–113.
21.
BrymanA.2006b. “Paradigm Peace and the Implications for Quality.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology Theory and Practice9(2):111–126.
22.
Burke JohnsonR.OnwuegbuzieA. K.TurnerL. A.2007. “Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(2):112–33.
23.
CaldwellJ. C.1977. “The Economic Rationality of High Fertility: An Iinvestigation Illustrated with Nigerian Survey Data.” Population Studies31(1):5–27.
24.
CaldwellJ. C.1982. Theory of Fertility Decline. London: Academic Press.
25.
CaldwellJ. C.1988. The Causes of Demographic Change: Experimental Research in South India. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
26.
CaldwellJ. C.ReddyP. H.CaldwellP.1983. “The Causes of Marriage Change in South India.” Population Studies37(3):343–61.
27.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W.1959. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix.” Psychological Bulletin56:81–105.
28.
CaracelliV. J.GreeneJ. C.1993. “Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis15:195–207.
29.
CoffeyG. J.KaplanI.SampsonR. C.TucciM. M.2010. “The Meaning and Mental Health Consequences of Long-term Immigration Detention for People Seeking Asylum.” Social Science and Medicine70(12):2070–79.
CurtisS.GeslerW.SmithG.WashburnS.2000. “Approaches to Sampling and Case Selection in Qualitative Research: Examples in the Geography of Health.” Social Science and Medicine50:1001–14
32.
De MeurG.RihouxB.2002. L’Analyse Quali-Quantitative Comparée (AQQCQCA): Approche, Techniques et Applications en Sciences Humaines. Louvain-la-Neuve, France: Academia-Bruylant.
33.
DenzinN. K.1978. The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: Praeger.
34.
Di GregorioS.DavidsonJ.2008. Qualitative Research Design for Software Users. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
35.
DriscollD. L.Appiah-YeboahA.SalibP.RupertD. J.2007. “Merging Qualitative and Quantitative Data in Mixed Methods Research: How to and Why Not.” Ecological and Environmental Anthropology3(1): 19–28.
36.
DuncanG. J.2008. “When to Promote, and When to Avoid: A Population Perspective.” Demography45(4):763–84.
37.
DzurecL. C.AbrahamJ. L.1993. “The Nature of Inquiry: Linking Quantitative and Qualitative Research.” Advances in Nursing Science16:73–79.
38.
FieldingN. G.LeeR. M.1993. Using Computers in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
39.
FirestoneW.1993. “Alternative Arguments for Generalizing from Data as Applied to Qualitative Research.” Educational Researcher22(4):16–23.
40.
FranzosiR.1989. “From Words to Numbers: A Generalized and Linguistics-Based Coding Procedure for Collecting Event-Data from Newspapers.” Pp. 263–98 in Sociological Methodology, vol. 19, edited by CloggClifford. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
41.
FranzosiR.1994. “From Words to Numbers: A Set Theory Framework for the Collection, Organization, and Analysis of Narrative Data.” Pp. 105–36 in Sociological Methodology, vol. 24, edited by MarsdenPeter. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
42.
FranzosiR.1997. “Mobilization and Counter-Mobilization Processes: From the ‘Red Years’ (1919–20) to the ‘Black Years’ (1921–22) in Italy: A New Methodological Approach to the Study of Narrative Data.” Theory and Society26(2/3):275–304.
43.
FranzosiR.2003. From Words to Numbers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Gibbs GrahamR.2002. Qualitative Data Analysis: Explorations with NVivo. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
45.
GilbertN., ed. 2008. Researching Social Life, 3rd ed. London: Sage.
46.
GreeneJ. C.2006. “Toward a Methodology of Mixed Methods Social Inquiry.” Research in the Schools13(1):93–98.
47.
GreeneJ. C.2007. Mixing Methods in Social Inquiry. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
48.
GreeneJ. C.2008. “Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology?” Journal of Mixed Methods Research2(1):7–22.
49.
GreeneJ. C.CaracelliV. J.GrahamW. F.1989. “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed Method Evaluation Designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis11:255–74.
50.
Hesse-BiberS. N.1996. Am I Thin Enough Yet? The Cult of Thinness and the Commercialization of Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
51.
Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP.2005. The Practice of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
52.
HollingsheadA. B.1949. Elmtown’s Youth. New York: Wiley.
53.
HutchisonA.J.JohnstonL.H.BreckonJ.D.2010. “Using QSR-NVivo to Facilitate the Development of a Grounded Theory Project: An Account of a Worked Example.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology13 (4):283–302
54.
JickT. D.1979. “Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.” Administrative Science Quarterly24:602–11.
55.
KaasalainenS.WilliamsJ.HadjistavropoulosT.ThorpeL.WhitingS.NevilleS.TremeerJ.2010. “Creating Bridges Between Researchers and Long-term Care Homes to Promote Quality of Life for Residents.” Qualitative Health Research20(12):1689–704.
56.
KertzerD.HoganD.1989. Family, Political Economy, and Demographic Change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
57.
KertzerD.1990. “Household Organization and Migration in Nineteenth-Century Italy.” Social Science History14(4):483–505.
58.
KertzerD. I.FrickeT.1997. “Toward an Anthropological Demography.” Pp. 1–35 in Anthropological Demography, edited by KertzerD. I.FrickeT.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59.
KingA.2010. “‘Membership Matters’: Applying Membership Categorisation Analysis (MCA) to Qualitative Data Using Computer? Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS) Software.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology13(1):1–16
60.
KnodelJ.ChamratrithirongA.DebavalyaN.1987. Thailand’s Reproductive Revolution: Rapid Fertility Decline in a Third World Setting. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
61.
KnodelJ.SaengtienchaiC.WassanaI.VanLandinghamM.2001. “The Impact of AIDS on Parents and Families in Thailand.” Research on Aging23(6): 633–70.
62.
KnodelJ.Im-emW.2004. “The Economic Consequences of Parents of Losing an Adult Child to AIDS: Evidence from Thailand.” Social Science and Medicine59:987–1001.
63.
KnodelJ. E.van de WalleE.1986. “Lesson from the Past: Policy Implications of Historical Fertility Studies.” Pp. 390–419 in The Decline of Fertility in Europe, edited by CoaleA.WatkinsS. C.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
LesthaegheR.1995. “The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation.” Pp. 17–62 in Gender and Family Change in Industrialized Countries, edited by Oppenheim MasonK.JensenA.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
65.
LewinsA.2008. “Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis (CAQDAS).” Pp. 125-44 in Researching Social Life, 3rd ed., edited by GilbertN.London: Sage.
66.
LewinsA.SilverC.2007. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. London: Sage.
67.
Livi-BacciM.2001. “Too Few Children and Too Much Family.” Daedalus130:137–56.
68.
ManningW. DCohenJ. A.SmockP. J.2011. “The Role of Romantic Partners, Family, and Peer Networks in Dating Couples’ Views About Cohabitation.” Journal of Adolescent Research26(1):115–49.
69.
MasseyD.1987. “The Ethnosurvey in Theory and Practice.” International Migration Review21(4):1498–522.
70.
MasseyD. S.ZentenoR.2000. “A Validation of the Ethnosurvey: The Case of Mexico-US migration.” International Migration Review34(3):766–93.
71.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
72.
MoffittR.2005. “Remarks on the Analysis of Causal Relationships in Population Research.” Demography42(1):91–108.
73.
MorganD. L.1998. “Practical Strategies for Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Applications to Health Research.” Qualitative Health Research8:362–76.
74.
MorseJ. M.1991. “Approaches to Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Triangulation.” Nursing Research40(2):120–23.
75.
MorseJ. M.2003. “Principles of Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research Design.” Pp. 189–208 in Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76.
NiglasK.2004. The Combined Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Educational Research. Tallinn, Estonia: Tallinn Pedagogical University Dissertation on Social Sciences.
77.
O’CathainA.ThomasK.2006. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods.” Pp. 102–11 in Qualitative Research in Health Care, 3rd ed., edited by PopeC.MaysN.Oxford, England: Blackwell.
78.
O’CathainA.MurphyE.NichollJ.2007. “Integration and Publications as Indicators of ‘Yield’ from Mixed Methods Studies.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research1(2):147–63.
79.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L.2005. “The Role of Sampling in Qualitative Research.” Academic Exchange Quarterly9:280–84.
80.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.LeechN. L.2007. “A Call for Qualitative Power Analyses.” Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology41:105–21.
81.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.CollinsK. M. T.2007. “A Typology of Mixed Methods Sampling Designs in Social Science Research.” The Qualitative Report12(2):281–316.
82.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.WitcherA. E.CollinsK. M. T.FilerJ.WiedmaierC.2007. “Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Validity Study of Teaching Evaluation Form Using a Mixed-Methods Analysis.” American Educational Research Journal44:113-60.
83.
RaginC. C.1987. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
84.
RaginC. C.1997. “Turning the Tables: How Case-Oriented Research Challenges Variable Oriented Research.” Comparative Social Research16(1):27–42.
85.
RaginC. C.2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
86.
RaoV.1997. “Can Economics Mediate the Relationship Between Anthropology and Demography?” Population and Development Review23(4):833–38.
87.
RichardsL.2002. “Qualitative Computing: A Methods Revolution?” International Journal of Social Research Methodology5(3):263–76.
RichardsT.2002. “An Intellectual History of NUD*IST and NVivo.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology5(3):199–214.
90.
RihouxB.2003. “Bridging the Gap Between the Qualitative and Quantitative Worlds? A Retrospective and Prospective View on Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Field Methods15(4):351–65.
91.
RihouxB.2006. “Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Systematic Comparative Methods: Recent Advances and Remaining Challenges for Social Science Research.” International Sociology21(5):679–706.
92.
RihouxB.RaginC., eds. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
93.
RobertsK. A.WilsonR. W.2002. “ICT and the Research Process: Issues Around the Compatibility of Technology with Qualitative Data Analysis.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online journal, 52 paragraphs] 3(2). Retrieved April2, 2010 (http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs/fqs-eng.htm).
94.
RossmanG. B.WilsonB. L.1985. “Numbers and Words: Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in a Single Large-Scale Evaluation Study.” Evaluation Review9:627–43.
95.
SaleJ. E. M.LohfeldL. H.BrazilK.2002. “Revisiting the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate: Implications for Mixed-Methods Research.” Quality and Quantity36(1):43–53.
96.
SandelowskiM.2000. “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Methods Studies.” Research in Nursing and Health23:246–55.
97.
SandelowskiM.2003. “Tables or Tableaux? The Challenges of Writing and Reading Mixed Methods Studies.” Pp. 321–50 in Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.London: Sage.
98.
SandelowskiM.HarrisB. G.Holditch-DavisD.1991. “Amniocentesis in the Context of Infertility.” Health Care for Women International12:167–78.
99.
SasslerS.2004. “The Process of Entering into Cohabiting Unions.” Journal of Marriage and Family66:491–505.
100.
SechrestL.SidanaS.1995. “Quantitative and Qualitative Methods: Is There an Alternative?” Evaluation and Program Planning18:77–87.
101.
SieberS. D.1973. “The Integration of Fieldwork and Survey Methods.” American Journal of Sociology73:1335–59.
102.
SmithT.2007. “Narrative Boundaries and the Dynamics of Ethnic Conflict and Conciliation.” Poetics35:22–46.
103.
StevensP. E.HildebrandtE.2009. “Pill Taking from the Perspective of HIV-Infected Women Who Are Vulnerable to Antiretroviral Treatment Failure.” Qualitative Health Research19(5):593–604.
104.
StollerE. P.WebsterN. J.BlixenC. E.McCormickR. A.HundA. J.PerzynskiA. T.KanuchS. W.ThomasC. L.KercherK.DawsonN. V.2009. “Alcohol Consumption Decisions Among Nonabusing Drinkers Diagnosed with Hepatitis C.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research3(1):65–86.
105.
SurkynJ.LesthaegheR.2004. “Value Orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An Update.”Demographic Research, Special Collection 3, Article 3:45-86.
106.
TashakkoriA.CreswellJ. W.2008. “Editorial: Mixed Methodology Across Disciplines.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research2(1):3–6.
TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.2010. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
109.
TaylorS. J.TashakkoriA.1997. “Toward an Understanding of Teachers’ Desire for Participation in Decision Making.” Journal of School Leadership7:1–20.
110.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA.2009. Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
111.
TwinnS.2003. “Status of Mixed Methods Research in Nursing.” Pp. 541–56 in Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, edited by TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.London: Sage.
112.
van de KaaD. J.2001. “Postmodern Fertility Preferences: From Changing Value Orientation to New Behavior.” Population and Development Review27 (suppl.):290–331.
113.
WattM. H.MamanS.EarpJ. A.EngE.SetelP. W.GolinC. E.JacobsonM.2009. “‘It’s all the time in my mind’: Facilitators of Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in a Tanzanian Setting.” Social Science and Medicine68(10):1793–800.
WeisnerT. S.2005. Discovering Successful Pathways in Children’s Development: New Methods in the Study of Childhood and Family Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
