BazeleyP. 2010. “Computer Assisted Integration of Mixed Methods Data Sources and Analyses.” Pp. 431–67 in Handbook of Mixed Methods Research for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., edited by TashakkoriA.TeddlieC.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BazeleyPat. 2012. “Regulating Qualitative Coding Using QDAS?” Sociological Methodology42:77–78.
3.
FranzosiRoberto. 2012. “The Difficulty of Mixed-method Approaches.” Sociological Methodology42:79–81.
4.
FranzosiRobertoDe FazioGianlucaStefaniaVicari. 2012. “Ways of Measuring Agency: An Application of Quantitative Narrative Analysis to Lynchings in Georgia (1875–1930).” Sociological Methodology42:1–42.
5.
GibbsGraham R.2012. “Different Approaches to Coding.” Sociological Methodology42:82–84.
6.
JunkerAndrew. 2012. “Optimism and Caution Regarding New Tools for Analyzing Qualitative Data.” Sociological Methodology42:85–87.
7.
KertzerD. I.WhiteM. J.GabrielliG.BernardiL.2009. “Italy’s Path to Very Low Fertility: The Adequacy of Economic and Second Demographic Transition Theories.” European Journal of Population25:89–115.
8.
SingerB.RyffC. D.CarrD.MageeW. J.1998. “Linking Life Histories and Mental Health: A Person–Centered Strategy.” Pp. 1–51 in Sociological Methodology, vol. 28, edited by RafteryAdrian E.Boston, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
9.
SmallM. L.2011. “How to Conduct Mixed-Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature.” Annual Review of Sociology37:57–86.