Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bailey, Guy , and Cynthia Bernstein . 1989. Methodology of a Phonological Survey of Texas. Journal of English Linguistics 22:6-16.

Bailey, Guy , TomWikle , and Lori Sand . 1991. The Focus of Linguistic Innovation in Texas. English World-Wide 12:195-214.

Bailey, Guy , TomWikle , Jan Tillery , and Lori Sand . 1991. The Apparent Time Constrict. Language Variation and Change 3:241-264.

Bailey, Guy , TomWikle , Jan Tillery , and Lori Sand . 1996. The Linguistic Consequences of Catastrophic Events: An Example from the American Southwest. In Sociolinguistic Variation. Data, Theory, and Analysis, edited by Jennifer Arnold et al., 435-451. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information.

Bailey, Guy , TomWikle , Jan Tillery , and Lori Sand . Forthcoming. Methodology for a Survey of Oklahoma Dialects. In Proceedings of the 1991 Mid-America Conference on Linguistics.

Labov,William . 1973. The Linguistic Consequences of Being a Lame. Language in Society 2:81-115.

Mufwene, Salikoko , 1986. The Universalist and Substrate Hypotheses Complement One Another. In Substrate versus Universals in Creole Genesis, edited by Pieter Muysken and Norval Smith , 129-162. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Muysken, Pieter , and Norval Smith , eds. 1986. Substrate versus Universals in Creole Genesis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Pickford, Glenna Ruth . 1956. American Linguistic Geography:ASociological Appraisal. Word 12:211-229.

10.

Wolfram, Walt . 1989. Structural Variability in Phonological Development: Final Nasals in Vernacular Black English. In Language Change and Variation, edited by Ralph Fasold and Deborah Schiffrin , 301-332. Amsterdam: Benjamins.