Aitchison, Jean. [1976] 1989. The articulate mammal: An introduction to psycholinguistics. Reprint, London: Hyman.
2.
—. [1981] 1991. Language change: Progress or decay? Reprint , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
—. [ 1987] 1994. Words in the mind: An introduction to the mental lexicon. Reprint, Oxford: Blackwell.
4.
Algeo, John.1988. The tag question in British English: It's different, i'n'it?English World-Wide9 (2): 171-91.
5.
—. 1990. It's a myth, innit? Politeness and the English tag question In The state of the language, edited by Christopher Ricks and Leonard Michaels, 443-50. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
Bambrook, Geoff.1996. Language and computers: A practical introduction to the computer analysis of languageEdinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
7.
Bornemann, Eduard, and Ernst Risch.1978. Griechische GrammatikFranfurt/ M: Diesterweg.
8.
Brown, Gillian, and George Yule.1983. Discourse analysisCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bybee, Joan.1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and formAmsterdam: Benjamins.
10.
Bybee, Joan L., and William Pagliuca.1985. Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning In Historical semantics, historical word formation, edited by Jacek Fisiak, 59-83. The Hague: Mouton.
11.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca.1994. The evolution of grammar : Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the worldChicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Bybee, Joan, and Joanne Scheibman.1997, May. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in EnglishPaper presented at the workshop on Constituency and Discourse, University of California, Santa Barbara
13.
Chomsky, Noam.1986. Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and useNew York: Praeger.
14.
Chomsky, Noam, and Morris Halle.1968. The sound pattern of EnglishNew York : Harper & Row.
15.
Croft, William.1990. Typology and universalsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud.1991. Frequenz und Kognition—Frequenz und MarkiertheitFolia Linguistica25:361-94.
17.
Francis, Winthrop Nelson, and Henry Kucera. [ 1964] 1989. Manual of information to accompany a standard corpus of present-day edited American English, for use with digital computersProvidence, RI: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.
18.
Geeraerts, Dirk.1992. Prototypicality effects in diachronic semantics: A round-up In Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition (Papers from the International Symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26-28 March 1990), edited by Günter Kellermann and Michael D. Morrissey, 183-203. Frankfurt/ M: Lang.
19.
Goldsmith, John A.1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonologyLondon: Blackwell.
20.
Greenberg, Joseph H.1966. Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. Janua Linguarum, Series Minor, 59The Hague : Mouton.
21.
Grice, Herbert Paul.1989. Logic and conversation In Studies in the way of words, edited by Herbert Paul Grice, 22-40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer.1991. Grammaticalization : A conceptual frameworkChicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Hiller, Ulrich.1984. Untersuchungen zu kontextuellen und registerspezifischen Einflüssen auf Morphemreduktionen im Englischen: eine vergleichende Korpusanalyse der Realisierung von Auxiliary Reduction und Not-ContractionEuropäische Hochschulschriften Reihe XIV, Vol. 128. Frankfurt/M: Lang.
24.
—. 1988. Contracted forms im Englischen In Kernprobleme der englischen Grammatik, edited by Wolf-Dietrich Bald, 91-105. München: Langenscheidt-Longman.
25.
Hooper, Joan B.1976. Word frequency in lexical diffusion and the source of morphophonological change In Current progress in historical linguistics, edited by William Christie, 95-105. Amsterdam: North Holland.
26.
Hopper, Paul J.1987. Emergent grammar In Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Feb. 14-16 1987, edited by Jon Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis, and Hana Filip, 139-57. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
27.
Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott.1993. GrammaticalizationCambridge : Cambridge University Press.
28.
Horn, Laurence R.1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature In Meaning, form, and use in context: Linguistic applications, edited by Deborah Schiffrin, 12-42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
29.
—. 1988. Pragmatic theory In Linguistics: The Cambridge survey. 4 vols. Edited by Frederick J. Newmeyer, 113-45. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Jespersen, Otto. [1905] 1982. Growth and structure of the English language Reprint, Oxford: Blackwell.
31.
Johannsson, Stig,Geoffrey N. Leech, and Helen Goodluck.1978. Manual of information to accompany the Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for use with digital computersOslo: Department of English, University of Oslo.
32.
Kaisse, Ellen.1985. Connected speech: The interaction of syntax and phonologyOrlando, FL: Academic Press.
33.
Käding, Friedrich Wilhelm.1897. Häufigkeitswörterbuch der deutschen SpracheSteglitz: Privately published.
34.
Kenesei, István. [ 1984] 1995. A nyelv és a nyelvek. ReprintBudapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
35.
Kluge, Friedrich.1989. Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen SpracheBerlin: de Gruyter.
36.
Kohler, Klaus J.1991. The phonetics/phonology issue in the study of articulatory reductionPhonetica48:180-92.
37.
Kortmann, Bernd.1992. Reanalysis completed and in progress: Participles as source of prepositions and conjunctions In Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition (Papers from the International Symposium at the University of Duisburg, 26-28 March 1990) , edited by Günter Kellermann and Michael D. Morrissey, 429-54. Frankfurt/M : Lang.
38.
-. 1996. Adverbial subordination: A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European languagesBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
39.
Krug, Manfred.1994. Contractions in spoken and written English: A corpus-based study of brachychronic language change. Master's thesis, Exeter.
40.
-. 1997. The auxiliarization of want and wanna In From margin to centre. Papers from the International Conference at the University of Iasi, 31 October-2 November 1996. Edited by Odette Blumenfeld, 35-45. Department of English, University of Iasi, Romania .
41.
-. 1998. British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit? A study in lexicalization based on social, regional and stylistic variationArbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik23 (2): 145-97.
42.
Labov, William.1969a. The study of non-standard EnglishWashington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
43.
-. 1969b. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copulaLanguage45:715-62.
44.
-. 1972. Language in the inner cityPhiladelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
45.
Lehmann, Christian. [1982] 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. LINCOM Studies in Theoretical Linguistics, 1. Reprint, München: LINCOM Europa.
46.
Levinson, Stephen C.1989. Review of Sperber & Wilson 1986Journal of Linguistics25:455-72.
47.
Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt.1995. Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English? A corpus-based investigation of language change in progressZeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik43 (2): 111-22.
48.
Manczak, Witold.1987. Frequenzbedingter unregelmässiger Lautwandel in den germanischen SprachenWroclaw: Polska Akademia Nauk.
49.
McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Wilson.1996. Corpus linguisticsEdinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
50.
McMahon, April M. S.1994. Understanding language changeCambridge : Cambridge University Press.
51.
Meillet, Antoine.1912. L'évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12. Reprinted in Meillet, Antoine. 1958. Linguistique historique et linguistique généraleParis: Champion, 130-148.
52.
Nübling, Damaris.1995. Kurzverben in germanischen Sprachen: Unterschiedliche Wege-gleiche ZieleZeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik62 (2): 127-54.
53.
Ogura, Mieko, and William Wang.1995. Lexical diffusion in semantic change: With special reference to universal changesFolia Linguistica Historica16 (1-2): 29-73.
54.
Philips, Susan U., and Anne Reynolds.1987. The interaction of variable syntax and discourse structure in women's and men's speech In Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective, edited by Susan Philips, Susan Steele, and Christine Tanz, 71-94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Poplack, Shana, and David Sankoff.1987. The Philadelphia story in the Spanish CaribbeanAmerican Speech62:291-314.
56.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik.1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English languageLondon: Longman.
57.
Radford, Andrew.1988. Transformational grammarCambridge : Cambridge University Press.
58.
Renouf, Antoinette.1992. What do you think of that: A pilot study of the phraseology of the core words of English In New directions in English language corpora: Methodology, results, software developments , edited by Gerhard Leitner, 301-17. Topics in English Linguistics, 9. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
59.
Rickford, John, and Renee Blake.1990. Copula contraction and absence in Barbadian English, Samana English and Vernacular Black English In Proceedings of the sixteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Feb. 16-19, 1990. 2 vols. Edited by Kira Hall, Jean-Pierre Koenig,Michael Meacham,Sandra Reinman, andLaurel Sutton,257-68. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
60.
Rosch, Eleanor.1975. Cognitive representations of semantic categoriesJournal of Experimental Psychology: General104 (3): 192-233.
61.
Rubenbauer, Hans,J.B. Hofmann, and R. Heine.1977. Lateinische GrammatikMünchen: Oldenbourg.
62.
Selkirk, Elisabeth O.1982. The syllable In The structure of phonological representations. 2 vols. Edited by Harry van der Hulst and Norval Smith, 337-83. Dordrecht : Foris.
63.
Sinclair, John.1991. Corpus, concordance, collocationOxford : Oxford University Press.
64.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirde Wilson. [ 1986] 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Reprint, Oxford: Blackwell.
65.
Tang-Boyland, Joyce.1996. Morphosyntactic change in progress: A psycholinguistic treatment. Ph.D. diss, University of California, Berkeley.
66.
Taylor, John R. [1989] 1995. Linguistic categorization: Prototypes in linguistic theory. Reprint, Oxford: Clarendon.
67.
Thompson, Sandra A., and Anthony Mulac.1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English In Approaches to grammaticalization. vol. II. Edited by Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, 313-30. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
68.
Tompa, József.1972. Kleine Ungarische GrammatikLeipzig : Enzyklopädie.
69.
Tops, Guy A.1974. The origin of the Germanic dental preterit . Leiden: Brill.
70.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Ekkehard König.1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited In Approaches to grammaticalization . vol. I. Edited by Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine, 189-218. Amsterdam: Benjamins .
71.
Ungerer, Friedrich.1991. Acronyms, trade names and motivationArbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik16 (2): 131-58.
72.
Zipf, George Kingsley.1929. Relative frequency as a determinant of phonetic changeHarvard Studies in Classical Philology15:1-95.
73.
-. 1935. The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philologyCambridge, MA: MIT Press .
74.
-. 1949. Human behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An introduction to human ecologyNew York: Hafner .
75.
Zwicky, Arnold M., and Geoffrey K. Pullum.1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n'tLanguage59 (3): 502-13.