Abney, Stephen.1987. The English Noun Phrase in Its Sentential Aspect. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationMIT.
2.
Ahlsén, Elisabeth.1993. On Agrammatism and Telegram Style: An Exemplifying Discussion of Swedish Data. Nordic Journal of Linguistics16:137-52.
3.
Akmajian, Adrian, and Frank Heny.1975. An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
4.
Barton, Ellen.1990. Nonsentential Constituents: A Theory of Grammatical Structure and Pragmatic InterpretationAmsterdam: John Benjamins.
5.
—. 1991. Nonsentential Constituents and Theories of Phrase Structure . In Views on Phrase Structure , edited by K. Leffel and D. Bouchard, 193-214. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
6.
Beaugrande, Robert de, and Wolfgang Dressler .1983. Introduction to Textlinguistics . London: Longman.
7.
Biber, Douglas.1988. Variation Across Speech and WritingNew York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
—. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic ComparisonNew York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan, eds. 1994. Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register.New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Brame, Michael.1979. A Note on COMP S Grammar vs. Sentence Grammar. Linguistic Analysis5:383-86.
11.
Chao, Wynn.1988. On Ellipsis. New York : Garland.
12.
Chomsky, Noam.1970. Remarks on Nominalization. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, edited by Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum, 184-221. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
13.
Cowper, Elizabeth.1992. A Concise Introduction to Syntactic Theory: The Government-Binding Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Crystal, David.1987. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of LanguageNew York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Fukui, Naoki.1986. A Theory of Category Projection and Its Application. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationMIT.
16.
Fukui, Naoki, and Margaret Speas.1986. Specifiers and Projection. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8Cambridge: MIT Press.
17.
Gregory, Michael, and Susanne Carroll.1978. Language and Situation: Language Varieties and Their Social ContextsLondon: Routledge Kegan Paul.
18.
Haegeman, Liliane.1987. Register Variation in English: Some Theoretical Observations . Journal of English Linguistics20:230-48.
19.
. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory2ded. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20.
Halliday, M.A.K.1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and MeaningLondon: Edward Arnold.
21.
Halliday, M.A.K., Angus McIntosh, and Peter Strevens.1964. The Linguistic Sciences and Language TeachingLondon: Longman.
22.
Hankamer, Jorge, and Ivan Sag.1976. Deep and Surface Anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry7:391-426.
23.
. 1984. Toward a Theory of Anaphoric Processing. Linguistics and Philosophy7:325-45.
24.
Isserlin, Max.1922. Über AgrammatismusZeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie [On Aggramatism] 75:332-410.
25.
Jackendoff, Ray.1971. Gapping and Related RulesLinguistic Inquiry2:21-36
26.
. —. 1977. X-bar Syntax. Cambridge : MIT Press.
27.
Laka, Itziar, and Anoop Mahajan, eds. 1989. Functional Heads and Clause Structure. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 10Cambridge : MIT Press.
28.
Leffel, Katherine, and Denis Bouchard, eds. 1991. Views on Phrase Structure.Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
29.
Libben, Gary, and Jürgen Tesak.1992. Language at a Cost. Paper presented at the Alberta Conference on Language, Lake Buff, Canada .
30.
— 1994. English Corpus of Telegraphese. Unpublished manuscript, European Telegram Project.
31.
Lobeck, Anne.1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification . New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Martin, J.R.1985. Process and Text: Two Aspects of Human Semiosis . In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse , Vol. 1, edited by James Benson and William Greaves. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33.
Morgan, Jerry.1973. Sentence Fragments and the Notion "Sentence."Issues in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Henry and Renee Kahane , edited by Kachru, Braj, et al., 719-51. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
34.
—. 1989. Sentence Fragments Revisited. In CLS Parasession on Language in Context, edited by B. Music, R. Graczyk, and C. Wiltshire, 228-41. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
35.
Napoli, Donna.1982. Initial Material Deletion in English. Glossa16:85-111.
36.
Perdue, Clive, ed. 1993. Adult Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Perlmutter, Paul, and Scott Soames.1979. Syntactic Argumentation and the Structure of EnglishBerkeley: University of California Press.
38.
Pope, Emily.1971. Answers to Yes-No Questions. Linguistic Inquiry2:69-82.
39.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik.1976. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
40.
—. 1985. Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language . London: Longman.
41.
Radford, Andrew.1981. Transformational Syntax: A Student's Guide to Chomsky's Extended Standard TheoryNew York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
—. 1988. Transformational Grammar: A First CourseNew York: Cambridge University Press.
43.
—. 1990. Syntactic Theory and the Acquisition of English Syntax: The Nature of Early Child Grammars of EnglishOxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
44.
Ross, John Robert.1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
45.
— 1969. Guess Who? In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting on the Chicago Linguistics Society , edited by R. Binnick, Al Davison, G. Green, and J. Morgan, 252-86. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
46.
Rothstein, Susan, ed. 1991. Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing. Syntax and Semantics 25. New York: Academic Press.
47.
Sag, Ivan.1976. Deletion and Logical Form. New York: Garland.
48.
Speas, Margaret.1990. Phrase Structure in Natural Language . Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer .
49.
Stowell, Timothy.1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertationMIT.
50.
Tesak, Jürgen.1992a. Factors Influencing Surface Manifestations of Agrammatism . Journal of Neurolinguistics7:91-101.
51.
. 1992b. Everything Is the Same: A Note on Caramazza and Hillis (1989) "The Disruption of Sentence Production: Some Dissociations."Brain and Language43:512-518.
52.
. 1994. Dutch Telegraphese. Linguistics32:325-44.
53.
Tesak, Jürgen, and Jürgen Dittman.1991. Telegraphic Style in Normals and Aphasics. Linguistics29:1111-37.
54.
Tesak, Jürgen, Jussi Niemi, and Päivi Koivuselkä-Sallinen.1992. Telegraphese and Ellipsis in German and Finnish: A Comparison. In New Departures in Contrastive Linguistics, Vol. 2, edited by Christian Mair and Manfred Markus, 75-83. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beitrage Zür Kulturwissenschaft.
55.
van Riemsdijk, Henk, and Edwin Williams.1986. Introduction to the Theory of Grammar . Cambridge: MIT Press.
56.
White, Lydia.1989. Universal Grammar and Second Language Acquisition . Amsterdam : John Benjamins .
57.
Yanofsky, Nancy.1978. NP Utterances. In Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 491-502. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.