Insertion of a consonant between a sonorant and voiceless obstruent is common in some environments in American English (e.g., prince = prints). In this paper, we describe a similar process whereby /θ/ is realized as a dental affricate [ t̪͡θ] in the infrequent environment of /lθ/ (e.g., wealth and stealth), a process we call “LTH affrication.” In audio collected using an online survey from a 265-person sample from the Rocky Mountain region of the United States, a third of them had LTH affrication. While the presence of LTH affrication was not predictable, the duration was: closure durations were longer among women, Utahns, suburban-oriented people, and practicing members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. This paper offers a rare insight into production patterns of a sociolinguistic indicator and suggests that infrequent phonological variables may have as much sociolinguistic conditioning as more common variables. Finally, this paper adds to the description of the Latter-day Saint religiolect in Utah.
AdcockRichardBeckerKara. 2016. Perceptions of TRAP-backing in Oregon English. Paper presented at the Cascadia Workshop in Sociolinguistics (CWSL) 2016, Seattle, WA.
2.
AliLatifDaniloffRayHammarbergRobert. 1979. Intrusive stops in nasal-fricative clusters: An aerodynamic and acoustic investigation. Phonetica36(2). 85-97. doi:10.1159/000259949.
3.
AmanoShigeakiHirataYukari. 2010. Perception and production boundaries between single and geminate stops in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America128(4). 2049-2058. doi:10.1121/1.3458847.
4.
AntieauLamont D.2011. Was/were variation in the Middle Rocky Mountains. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics32. 48-66. https://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/handle/1808/8097 (19February, 2016).
5.
BakerWendyBowieDavid. 2010. Religious affiliation as a correlate of linguistic behavior. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics15(2). 1-10. https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol15/iss2/2/ (14August, 2015).
6.
Baker-SmemoeWendyBowieDavid. 2015. Linguistic behavior and religious activity. Language & Communication42. 116-124. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2014.12.004.
7.
Baker-SmemoeWendyStanley.Joseph A.2024. Relief society voice. Paper presented at the Linguistics Discussion Group, Provo, UT.
8.
Bar-ElLeoraFeltonLauraSprowlsLisa. 2017. Montana English and its place in the West. In FridlandValerieBeckford WassinkAliciaKendallTylerEvansBetsy E. (eds), Speech in the western states, volume 2: The Mountain West (Publication of the American Dialect Society 102), 107-138. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/00031283-4295299.
9.
BenjaminBarbaranne. 1997. Speech production of normally aging adults. Seminars in Speech and Language18(2). 135-141. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1064068.
10.
BenorSarah. 2001. The learned /t/: Phonological variation in Orthodox Jewish English. In SanchezTaraEzra JohnsonDaniel (eds), Penn working papers in linguistics: Selected papers from NWAV29, 1-16. Philadelphia, PA: University of Penn Linguistics.
BonfiglioThomas Paul. 2002. Race and the rise of standard American. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
13.
BowieDavid. 2003. Early development of the card-cord merger in Utah. American Speech78(1). 31-51. doi:10.1215/00031283-78-1-31.
14.
BowieDavid. 2008. Acoustic characteristics of Utah’s CARD-CORD merger. American Speech83(1). 35-61. doi:10.1215/00031283-2008-002.
15.
BowieDavid. 2017. Early development of the Western Vowel System in Utah. In FridlandValerieBeckford WassinkAliciaKendallTylerEvansBetsy E. (eds), Speech in the western states, volume 2: The Mountain West (Publication of the American Dialect Society 102), 83-106. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/000312834295211.
16.
BowieDavid. 2019. Individual variation in the development of the Western Vowel System of Utah. Linguistics Vanguard5(s2). 20180020. doi:10.1515/lingvan-2018-0020.
17.
BucholtzMary. 1999. “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society28(2). 203-223. doi:10.1017/S0047404599002043.
18.
CardosoAmandaHall-LewLaurenKementchedjhievaYovaPurseRuaridh. 2016. Between California and the Pacific Northwest: The front lax vowels in San Francisco English. In FridlandValerieKendallTylerEvansBetsy E.Beckford WassinkAlicia (eds), Speech in the western states: Volume 1: The coastal states (Publication of the American Dialect Society 101), 33-54. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/00031283-3772890.
19.
CarmichaelKatieReedPaul E.2025. Language and place (Elements in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
CarrDonna Humpherys. 1966. Reflections of Atlantic Coast lexical variations in three Mormon communities. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah MA thesis.
21.
CassidyFrederic C.HallJoan HoustonVan SchneidemesserLuanne. 1985. Dictionary of American regional English. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
22.
ChattertonBenjamin Joseph.2008. Religious networks as a sociolinguistic factor: The case of Cardston. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Master’s thesis. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1477/ (accessed May 21, 2025).
23.
ChodroffEleanorFoulkesPaul. 2024. Sociophonetics and stops. In StrellufChristopher (ed.), The Routledge handbook of sociophonetics, 143-174. London: Routledge.
24.
ClementsGeorge Nick. 1990. The role of sonority cycle in core syllabification. In KingstonJohnBeckmanMary E. (eds), Between the grammar of physics and speech (Papers in Laboratory Phonology I), 283-333. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
CloughWilson O.1936. Note on dialect in the Uinta Mountains of Wyoming. American Speech11(2). 190-192. doi:10.2307/451721.
26.
CloughWilson O.1954. Some Wyoming speech patterns. American Speech29(1). 28-35. doi:10.2307/453593.
27.
CookStanley Joseph.1969. Language change and the emergence of an urban dialect in Utah. University of Utah PhD dissertation.
28.
DavidsonLisa. 2016. Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics54. 35-50. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.09.003.
Di PaoloMarianna. 1989. Double modals as single lexical items. American Speech64(3). 195-224. doi:10.2307/455589.
31.
Di PaoloMarianna. 1992. Hypercorrection in response to the apparent merger of (ɔ) and (ɑ) in Utah English. Language & Communication12(3). 267-292. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(92)90017-4.
32.
Di PaoloMarianna. 1993. Propredicate do in the English of the Intermountain West. American Speech68(4). 339-356. doi:10.2307/455771.
33.
Di PaoloMariannaFaberAlice. 1990. Phonation differences and the phonetic content of the tense-lax contrast in Utah English. Language Variation and Change2(2). 155-204. doi:10.1017/S0954394500000326.
34.
Di PaoloMariannaJohnsonLisa. 2018. Revisiting (NG) in Utah English. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Dialect Society, Salt Lake City, UT.
35.
D’OnofrioAnnette. 2016. Social meaning in linguistic perception. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
36.
DragerKatie M.KirtleyJoelle. 2016. Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in exemplarbased models of speech production and perception. In BabelAnna M. (ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research, 1-24. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139680448.003.
37.
DuncanDaniel. 2019. The influence of suburban development and metropolitan fragmentation on language variation and change: Evidence from Greater St. Louis. Journal of Linguistic Geography7(2). 82-97. doi:10.1017/jlg.2019.8.
38.
EckertPenelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12(4). 453-476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x.
39.
EddingtonDavidChannerCaitlin. 2010. American English has goʔ A Loʔ Of Glottal stops: Social diffusion and linguistic motivation. American Speech85(3). 338-351. doi:10.1215/00031283-2010-019.
40.
EddingtonDavidSavageMatthew. 2012. Where are the moun[ʔə]ns in Utah?American Speech87(3). 336-349. doi:10.1215/00031283-1958345.
41.
EddingtonDavid Ellingson. 2023. Utah English. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
42.
EddingtonDavid EllingsonBrownEarl Kjar. 2021. A production and perception study of /t/ glottalization and oral releases following glottals in the US. American Speech96(1). 1-41. doi:10.1215/00031283-8620501.
43.
EspositoAnnaGabriellaMariaBenedettoDi. 1999. Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America106(4). 2051-2062. doi:10.1121/1.428056.
44.
EspositoLewisLakeEmily. 2023. Complicating prevelar raising in the West. American Speech98(2). 156-193. doi:10.1215/00031283-9412541.
45.
FeldscherCaraDurvasulaKarthik. 2017. Excrescent stops in American English. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 2. 20. doi:10.3765/plsa.v2i0.4064.
46.
FourakisMariosPortRobert. 1986. Stop epenthesis in English. Journal of Phonetics14(2). 197-221.
47.
GarrisonArthur Scott. 2019. Not quite Canada, definitely not California: Evidence of the low-back-merger shift in Moscow, Idaho. Portland, OR: Reed College Bachelor’s thesis.
48.
HallJoan H.1985.A lexical survey of the Snake River Region. In LouieW. Attebery(ed.), Idaho Folklife: Homesteads to headstones, 12-28. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
49.
HaryBenjamin. 2011. Religiolect. In MooreD. D. (ed.), Critical terms in Jewish language studies, 443-446. Ann Arbor, MI: Frankel Institute for Advanced Jewish Studies, University of Michigan.
50.
HaydenRebecca E.1950. The relative frequency of phonemes in General-American English. WORD6(3). 217-223. doi:10.1080/00437956.1950.11659381.
51.
HelquistVal J.1970. A study of one phonological variable in urban and rural Utah. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Unpublished Master’s thesis.
52.
HollandCoryBrandenburgTara. 2017. Beyond the front range: The Coloradan vowel space. In FridlandValerieBeckford WassinkAliciaKendallTylerEvansBetsy E. (eds), Speech in the western states, volume 2: The Mountain West (Publication of the American Dialect Society 102), 9-30. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/00031283-4295277.
53.
JensenPaul. 1931. Desert rats’ word-list from Eastern Idaho. American Speech7(2). 119-123. doi:10.2307/451559.
54.
JohnsonLisa Morgan. 2024. Speaking([g]) of place and ethnicity: (NG) realization among Utah teens. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Dialect Society, New York City, NY.
55.
KimChaeyoonReddySravanaStanfordJamesWyschogrodEzraGrieveJack. 2019. Bring on the crowd! Using online audio crowdsourcing for large-scale New England dialectology and acoustic sociophonetics. American Speech94(2). 151-194. doi:10.1215/00031283-7251252.
56.
KoppDaniela. 2016. The Boise Idahoan English accent: A phonological study. Bern: University of Bern Bachelor’s thesis.
57.
LabovWilliam. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. WORD19(3). 273-309. doi:10.1080/00437956.1963.11659799.
58.
LabovWilliam. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City (Urban Language Series). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
59.
LabovWilliam. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
60.
LabovWilliamAshSharonBobergCharles. 2006. The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
61.
LaunspachSonja A.2012. The Journey to Idaho: The use of oral history tapes and census data to trace the history of regional dialect features. Idaho Yesterdays53(1 & 2).
62.
LillieDiane DeFord. 1998. The Utah dialect survey. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Master’s thesis.
63.
LindsayDorothy N.1933. The language of the “Saints.”American Speech8(2). 30-33. doi:10.2307/3181857.
64.
MarttilaOlli-Pekka. 2016. A tentative argument for regional quality targets in assimilating schwa. Turku, Finland: University of Turku Minor thesis.
65.
MeechanMarjory. 1999. The Mormon drawl: Religious ethnicity and phonological variation in southern Alberta. Ottawa, ON: University of Ottawa PhD dissertation. doi:10.20381/ruor-7412.
66.
MeinigDonald W.1965. The Mormon culture region: Strategies and patterns in the geography of the American West, 1847–1964. Annals of the Association of American Geographers55(2). 191-219. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.1965.tb00515.x.
67.
MorkelWendy McCollum. 2003. Tracing a sound pattern: /ay/-monophthongization in Utah English. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Unpublished Master’s thesis.
68.
NishikawaMorioMoriyamaYasuyo. 1991. Phonological analysis of vowels in Montana dialect. The Memoirs of the Faculty of Education, Kumamoto University, The Humanities, 40. 149-186. https://kumadai.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/16444
69.
OhalaJohn J.1974. Experimental historical phonology. In JonesCharlesAndersonJohn Mathieson (eds), Historical linguistics II. Theory and description in phonology, 353-389. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
70.
OliveJoseph P.GreenwoodAliceColemanJohn. 1993. Acoustics of American English speech: A dynamic approach. Murray Hill, NJ: Springer-Verlag.
71.
PedersonLeeMadsenMichael W.1989. Linguistic geography in Wyoming. Journal of English Linguistics22(1). 17-22.
72.
PierrehumbertJanet B.2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In BybeeJoan L.HopperPaul J. (eds), Typological studies in language, vol. 45, 137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/tsl.45.08pie.
73.
PodesvaRobert J.2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(4). 478-504. doi:10.1111/j.14679841.2007.00334.x.
74.
PodesvaRobert J.D’onofrioAnnetteVan HofwegenJannekeKyung KimSeung. 2015. Country ideology and the California Vowel Shift. Language Variation and Change27(2). 157-186. doi:10.1017/S095439451500006X.
75.
PodesvaRobert J.Hall-LewLaurenBrenierJasonStarrRebeccaLewisStacy. 2012. Condoleeza Rice and the sociophonetic construction of identity. In Manuel Hernández-CampoyJuanAntonio Cutillas-EspinosaJuan (eds), Style-shifting in public: New perspectives on stylistic variation (Studies in Language Variation 9), 65-80. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
ReedCarroll E.1957. Word geography of the Pacific Northwest. Orbis6. 86-93.
78.
ReedCarroll E.1961. The pronunciation of English in the Pacific Northwest. Language37(4). 559-564. doi:10.2307/411357.
79.
RickfordJohn R.1975. Carrying the new wave into syntax: The case of Black English BÍN. In W. FasoldRalphShuyRoger W. (eds), Analyzing variaton in language, 162-183. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
80.
RieboldJohn Matthew. 2015. The social distribution of a regional change: /æg, ɛg, eg/ in Washington State. Seattle, WA: University of Washington PhD dissertation.
81.
RosenNicoleSkriverCrystal. 2015. Vowel patterning of Mormons in Southern Alberta, Canada. Language & Communication42. 104-115. doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2014.12.007.
82.
SheskinDavid J.2020. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. 5th edn.Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
83.
ShostedRyan K.2011. An articulatory–aerodynamic approach to stop excrescence. Journal of Phonetics39(4). 660-667. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2011.07.001.
84.
StanleyJoseph A.2018. Changes in the timber industry as a catastrophic event: BAG-raising in Cowlitz County, Washington. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics24(2). https://repository.upenn.edu/handle/20.500.14332/45208
85.
StanleyJoseph A.2019. (thr)-Flapping in American English: Social factors and articulatory motivations. In CrumJ. (ed.), Proceedings of the 5th annual linguistics conference at UGA, 49-63. Athens, GA: The Linguistics Society at the University of Georgia. http://hdl.handle.net/10724/38831
86.
StanleyJoseph A.2020. The absence of a religiolect among Latter-day Saints in Southwest Washington. In FridlandValerieBeckfordAliciaLaurenWassinkTyler KendallHall-Lew (eds), Speech in the western states: Volume 3, understudied varieties (Publication of the American Dialect Society 105), 95-122. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi:10.1215/00031283-8820642. (5December, 2020).
87.
StanleyJoseph A.2022. Regional patterns in prevelar raising. American Speech97(3). 374-411. doi:10.1215/00031283-9308384.
88.
StanleyJoseph A.2023. Utahns sound Utahn when they avoid sounding Utahn. Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Denver, CO.
89.
StanleyJoseph A.JacksonKaTrina. 2023. Is Idaho English really “the epitome of average English”?Paper presented at the American Dialect Society Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
90.
StanleyJoseph A.StevensonJoshBaker-SmemoeWendy. 2024. The Missionary Voice: Perceptions of an emerging register. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America9(1). 5701. doi:10.3765/plsa.v9i1.5701.
91.
StanleyJoseph A.VandernietKyle. 2018. Consonantal variation in Utah English. In J. Crum (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th annual linguistics conference at UGA, 50-65. Athens, GA: The Linguistic Society at UGA. https://hdl.handle.net/10724/37876.
92.
SwanJulia Thomas. 2020. Bag across the border. American Speech95(1). 46-81. doi:10.1215/00031283-7587892.
93.
SykesRobert D.2010. A sociophonetic study of (aɪ) in Utah English. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Master’s thesis.
94.
Van HofwegenJanneke. 2017. The systematicity of style: Investigating the full range of variation in everyday speech. Stanford, CA: Stanford University PhD dissertation.
95.
VillarrealDanKohnMary. 2021. Local meanings for supralocal change: Perceptions of trap backing in Kansas. American Speech96(1). 45-77. doi:10.1215/00031283-8186897.
96.
WarnerNatasha. 2002. The phonology of epenthetic stops: Implications for the phonetics-phonology interface in optimality theory. Linguistics40(1). 1-27. doi:10.1515/ling.2002.004.
97.
WarnerNatashaWeberAndrea. 2001. Perception of epenthetic stops. Journal of Phonetics29(1). 53-87. doi:10.1006/jpho.2001.0129.
98.
YuanJiahongLibermanMarkCieriChristopher. 2006. Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation. In INTERSPEECH 2006 - ICSLP, Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, September 17-21, 2006. ISCA, 2006. doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2006-204.
99.
ZwickyA. M.1972. Note on a phonological hierarchy in English. In StockwellRobert P.MacauleyRonald K. S. (eds), Linguistic change and generative theory, 275-301. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
100.
ŻygisMarzena. 2010. Typology of consonantal insertions. ZAS Papers in Linguistics52. 111-140. doi:10.21248/zaspil.52.2010.385.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
