D’OnofrioAnnetteEckertPenelope. 2021. Affect and iconicity in phonological variation. Language in Society50(1). 29-51.
2.
D’OnofrioAnnetteSteckerAmelia. 2022. The social meaning of stylistic variability: Sociophonetic (in)variance in presidential candidates’ campaign rallies. Language in Society51(1). 1-28.
3.
DragerKatieKirtleyM. Joelle. 2016. Awareness, salience, and stereotypes in exemplar-based models of speech production and perception. In BabelAnna (ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research, 1-24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
EckertPenelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
5.
EckertPenelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics12(4). 453-476.
6.
EckertPenelope. 2010. Affect, sound symbolism, and variation. In GormanKyleMacKenzieLaurel (eds.). University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, vol. 15(2), 9. URL https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol15/iss2/
7.
EckertPenelope. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of variation. Annual Review of Anthropology41. 87-100.
8.
EckertPenelope. 2018. Meaning and linguistic variation: The Third Wave in sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
EckertPenelope. 2019. The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority. Language95(4). 751-776.
10.
LabovWilliam. 2001. Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2, Social factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11.
OhalaJohn J.1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In HintonLeanneNicholsJohannaOhalaJohn J. (eds.), Sound symbolism, 325-347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
