AitchisonJean. 2003. Psycholinguistic perspectives on language change. In JosephBrian D.JandaRichard D. (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 736-743. Oxford: Blackwell.
2.
BentzChristianKielaDouweHillFeliButteryPaula. 2014. Zipf’s law and the grammar of languages: A quantitative study of Old and Modern English parallel texts. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory10(2). 175-211.
3.
BergsAlexanderHoffmannThomas (eds.). 2017. Cognitive approaches to the history of English. English Language and Linguistics21(2). Special issue.
4.
BybeeJoan. 2003. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In TomaselloMichael (ed.), The new psychology of language, vol. 2, 145-167. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
CarrollMaryStutterheimChristiane vonNueseRalph. 2004. The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In PechmannThomasHabelChristopher (eds.), Multidisciplinary approaches to language production, 183-218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6.
DiesselHolger. 2012. Diachronic change and language acquisition. In BergsAlexanderBrintonLaurel J. (eds.), English historical linguistics. An international handbook, vol. 2, 1599-1613. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
7.
EverettCaleb. 2013. Linguistic relativity. Evidence across languages and cognitive domains. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter Mouton.
8.
GrossmanEitanNoveckIra. 2015. What can historical linguistics and experimental pragmatics offer each other. Linguistics Vanguard1(1). 145-153.
9.
HawkinsJohn A.2012. The drift of English towards invariable word order from a typological and Germanic perspective. In NevalainenTerttuTraugottElizabeth C. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 622-632. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
HilpertMartinCorreia SaavedraDavid. 2018. The unidirectionality of semantic changes in grammaticalization: An experimental approach to the asymmetric priming hypothesis. English Language and Linguistics22(3). 357-380
11.
JägerGerhardRosenbachAnette. 2008. Priming and unidirectional language change. Theoretical Linguistics 34(2). 85-113.
12.
LewisMolly L.FrankMichael C.2016. The length of words reflects their conceptual complexity. Cognition153. 182-195.
13.
LosBettelou. 2012. The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Meurman-SolinAnneliLópez-CousoMaria-JoséLosBettelou (eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English, 21-46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
LosBettelouStarrenMarianne. 2012. A typological switch in Early Modern English—and the beginning of one in Dutch?Leuvense Bijdragen - Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology98. 98-126.
15.
PaulHermann. 1909. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Dritte Auflage. Halle: Max Niemeyer.
16.
WeinreichUrielLabovWilliamHerzogMarvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In LehmannWinfred P.MalkielYakov (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95-188. Austin: University of Texas Press.
17.
WolkChristophBresnanJoanRosenbachAnetteSzmrecsanyiBenedikt. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica30(3). 382-419.
