This study analyzes an emerging variety of North Carolina Hispanicized English in terms of the grammatical variable of past tense marking. It compares variation in Durham, North Carolina, Hispanicized English at increasing lengths of residency to generational varieties of Hispanicized English in a comparison sample, another contact-influenced ethnic variety of English, spoken by a longstanding Chicano community in south Texas. In this way, it tests the hypothesis that interlanguage (socio)linguistic development may in fact recapitulate generational changes in different sociodemographic speech settings. Results indicate that for the speakers in this study, the -t/-d variable indicates not only the constraints of the phonological process of deletion, but two morphosyntactic constraints: (1) the effects of verb class and (2) a grammatical process of past tense unmarking.
AdamsonH.D.1988. Variation theory and second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2.
AdamsonH.D.1992. Academic competence: Theory and classroom practice. New York: Longman.
3.
AndersenRogerShiraiYasuhiro. 1995. The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language71(4). 743-762.
4.
BatesElizabeth. 1979. The emergence of symbols: Ontogeny and phylogeny. In Andrew CollinsW. (ed.), Children’s language & communication: The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, vol. 12, 121-157. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5.
BayleyRobert. 1991. Variation theory and second language learning: Linguistic and social constraints on interlanguage tense marking. Stanford, CA: Stanford University dissertation.
6.
BayleyRobert. 1994. Interlanguage variation and the quantitative paradigm: Past tense marking in Chinese-English. In TaroneElaine E.GassSusan M.CohenAndrew D. (eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition, 157-181. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BayleyRobert. 1996. Competing constraints on variation in the speech of adult Chinese learners of English. In BayleyRobertPrestonDennis R. (eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, 97–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
8.
BayleyRobertLangmanJuliet. 2002. The acquisition of verbal morphology by Chinese learners of Hungarian. Language Variation and Change14(1). 55-77.
9.
BayleyRobertLangmanJuliet. 2004. Variation in the group and the individual: Evidence from second language acquisition. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL)42(4). 303-318.
10.
BickertonDerek. 1975. Dynamics of a creole system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BickertonDerek. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
12.
BlakeRenée. 1997. Defining the envelope of linguistic variation: The case of “don’t count” forms in the copula analysis of African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change9(1). 57-80.
13.
BroselowEllenChenSu-IWangChilin. 1998. The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition20. 261-280.
14.
BullJohnBenjaminCarmen. 2004. A new reference grammar of modern Spanish. 4th edn.London: Hodder Education.
15.
BybeeJoan. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change14(3). 261-290.
16.
BybeeJoan L.PerkinsReverePagliucaWilliam. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Callahan-PriceErin. 2008. Accommodation without assimilation: Past tense unmarking and peak accent alignment in Hispanic English. Raleigh: North Carolina State University thesis.
18.
Callahan-PriceErin. 2013. Emerging Hispanic English in the Southeast U.S.: Grammatical variation in a triethnic community. Durham, NC: Duke University dissertation.
19.
CoeNorman. 2001. Speakers of Spanish and Catalan. In SwanMichaelSmithBernard (eds.), Learner English, 2nd edn., 90-112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
CorderStephen P.1981. Formal simplicity and functional simplification. In AndersenRoger (ed.), New dimensions in second language acquisition research, 146-152. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21.
DickersonLonna J.1975. The learner’s interlanguage as a system of variable rules. TESOL Quarterly9(4). 401-407.
22.
DickersonWayne. 1976. The psycholinguistic unity of language learning and language change. Language Learning26(2). 215-231.
23.
DittmarNorbert. 1993. Proto-semantics and emergent grammars. In DittmarNorbertReichAstrid (eds.), Modality in language acquisition, 213-234. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
EllisNick C.Larsen-FreemanDiane. 2009. Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning59(1). 90-125.
26.
FasoldRalph. 1972. Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.
27.
FoleyDouglas E.1990. Learning capitalist culture: Deep in the heart of Tejas. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
28.
GoldschneiderJenniferDeKeyserRobert. 2001. Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning51(1). 1-50.
29.
GuitartJorge M.1978. Aspects of Spanish aspect: A new look at the preterit/imperfect distinction. In SuñerMargarita (ed.), Contemporary studies in Romance linguistics, 132-168. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
30.
GuyGregory R.1980. Variation in the group and the individual: The case of final stop deletion. In LabovWilliam (ed.), Locating language in time and space, 1-36. New York: Academic Press.
31.
HackertStephanie. 2004. Urban Bahamian Creole: System and variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32.
HackertStephanie. 2008. Counting and coding the past: Circumscribing the variable context in quantitative analyses of past inflection. Language Variation and Change20(1). 127-154.
33.
HaeckelErnst Heinrich Philipp August. 1899. The riddle of the universe at the close of the nineteenth century. New York: Harper & Brothers.
34.
Hancin-BhattBarbaraBhattRakesh Mohan. 1997. Optimal L2 syllables: Interactions of transfer and developmental effects. Studies in Second Language Acquisition19(3). 331-378.
35.
HuffordCharles H.1929. The social and economic effects of Mexican migration into Texas. Boulder: University of Colorado at Boulder thesis.
36.
JakobsonRoman. 1968 [1941]. Child language, aphasia, and phonological universals. Translated by KeilerA. R.The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. [Kindersprache, Aphasie, und Allgemeine Lautgestze.]
37.
KangHyeon-Seok. 1994. Variation in past-marking and the question of the system in Trinidadian English. In BealsKatharine (ed.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 2, Parasession on variation in linguistic theory, 150-164. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 30(2).
38.
KasardaJohn D.JohnsonJames H.Jr.2006. The impact of the Hispanic population on the state of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: Frank Hawkins Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise.
39.
KendallTyler. 2007. Enhancing sociolinguistic data collections: The North Carolina Sociolinguistic Archive and Analysis Project. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics13(2). 15-26.
40.
LabovWilliam. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language45(4). 715-762.
41.
LabovWilliam. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
42.
LabovWilliam. 1994. Principles of linguistic change: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
43.
LabovWilliamWaletzkyJoshua. 1967. Narrative analysis. In HelmJune (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12-44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
44.
LindblomBjörn. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of Acoustical Society of America35(11). 1773-1781.
45.
MajorRoy. 1994. Chronological and stylistic aspects of second language acquisition of consonant clusters. Language Learning44(4). 655-680.
46.
MajorRoy. 2001. Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
MontejanoDavid. 1987. Anglos and Mexicans in the making of Texas: 1836-1986. Austin: University of Texas Press.
48.
PatrickPeter L.1991. Creoles at the intersection of variable processes: -t, -d deletion and past-marking in the Jamaican mesolect. Language Variation and Change3(2). 171-189.
49.
PoplackShanaTagliamonteSali. 2001. African American English in the diaspora. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
50.
PrestonDennis R.1989. Sociolinguistics and second language acquisition. Oxford: Blackwell.
51.
PrestonDennis R.1996. Variationist perspectives on second language acquisition. In BayleyRobertPrestonDennis R. (eds.), Second language acquisition and linguistic variation, 1-45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
52.
RickfordJohn. 1986. Me Tarzan, You Jane: Cognition, expression and the creole speaker. Journal of Linguistics22(2). 281-310.
53.
SankoffDavidTagliamonteSaliSmithEric. 2005. GoldVarb X: A variable rule application for Macintosh and Windows. Toronto: Department of Linguistics, University of Toronto.
54.
Santa AnaOtto. 1991. Phonetic simplification processes in the English of the barrio: A cross-generational sociolinguistic study of the Chicanos of Los Angeles. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.
55.
SchecterSandraBayleyRobert. 2002. Language as cultural practice: Mexicanos en el norte. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
SchreierDaniel. 2003. Isolation and language change: Sociohistorical and contemporary evidence from Tristan da Cunha English. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
57.
SelinkerLarry. 1972. Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics10(3). 209-231.
58.
SinglerJohn Victor. 1984. Variation in tense-aspect-modality in Liberian English. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
TaroneElaine. 2007. Sociolinguistic approaches to second language acquisition research: 1997-2007. Modern Language Journal91(1), Supplement. 837-848.
61.
TaylorPaul S.1971. American-Mexican frontier: Nueces county, Texas. New York: Russell & Russell.
62.
ThomasErik R. (ed.). Forthcoming. Mexican American English: Substrate influence and the birth of an ethnolect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
ThomasErikCallahanErin. 2007. Selection of interference features in the formation of a new dialect. Philadelphia, PA: Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV 36) paper.
64.
del VecchioAnnGuerreroMichael. 1995. Handbook of English language proficiency tests. Albuquerque: New Mexico Highlands University.
65.
WeinreichUrielLabovWilliamHerzogMarvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In LehmannWinifred P.MalkielYakov (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 97-105. Austin: University of Texas Press.
66.
WeldonTracey L.1996. Past marking in Gullah. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics3(1). 63-72.
67.
WinfordDonald. 1992. Back to the past: The BEV/creole connection revisited. Language Variation and Change4(3). 311-357.
68.
WolframWalt. 1969. A linguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
69.
WolframWalt. 1984. Unmarked tense in American Indian English. American Speech59(1). 31-50.
70.
WolframWalt. 1985. Variability in tense marking: A case for the obvious. Language Learning35(2). 229-253.
71.
WolframWaltChristianDonnaHatfieldDeborah. 1983. Adolescent and young adult English of Vietnamese refugees 262. NIE Final Report G-81-0122.
72.
WolframWaltFasoldRalph. 1974. The study of social dialects in American English. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
73.
WolframWaltHatfieldDeborah. 1984. Tense marking in second language learning: Patterns of spoken and written English in a Vietnamese community 170. NIE Final Report G-83-0035.
74.
WolframWaltReaserJeffrey. 2014. Talkin’ Tar Heel: How our voices tell the story of North Carolina. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
75.
WolfsonNessa. 1982. On tense alternation and the need for analysis of native speaker usage in second language acquisition. Language Learning32(1). 53-68.
