This paper investigates variation in rhoticity on the reality television show Say Yes to the Dress. The study examines the speech of five bridal consultants working at Kleinfeld Bridal in Manhattan. Using the brides’ budgets as a proxy for social status, we ask whether variation in the consultants’ use of (r) correlates with the amount of money the bride states she is willing to spend on her dress, which ranges from $1,500 to unlimited. Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis shows significant differences across three budget categories, a finding that echoes Labov’s original department store study as well as later replications. We discuss our findings within the frame of an audience design approach to style-shifting and the reality television genre and explore how such a mediated data source can be a fruitful area for sociolinguistic research.
BakhtMaryam. 2010. Here’s “The Situation”: Style and identity on the “Jersey Shore.”Paper presented at New Ways in Analyzing Variation 39, San Antonio, TX, November 4–6.
2.
BeckerKara. 2009. /r/ and the construction of place identity on New York City’s Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics13(5). 634–658.
3.
BeckerKara. 2014a. (r) we there yet? The change to rhoticity in New York City English. Language Variation and Change26(2). 141–168.
4.
BeckerKara. 2014b. The social motivations of reversal: Raised BOUGHT in New York City English. Language in Society43(4). 395–420.
5.
BellAllan. 1984. Language style as audience design. Language in Society13(2). 145–204.
6.
BellAllan. 1992. Hit and miss: Referee design in the dialects of New Zealand television advertisements. Language and Communication12(3/4). 327–340.
7.
BellAllan. 2001. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In EckertPenelopeRickfordJohn (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 139–169. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BignellJonathan. 2005. Big Brother: Reality TV in the twenty-first century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BlakeReneeShoustermanCara. 2010. Second generation West Indian Americans and English in New York City. English Today26(3). 35–46.
10.
BucholtzMary. 1999. “You da man”: Narrating the racial other in the linguistic production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics3(4). 443–460.
11.
BucholtzMary. 2003. Sociolinguistic nostalgia and the authentication of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics7(3). 398–416.
12.
BucholtzMary. 2011. White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
EckertPenelope. 2000. Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14.
EngstromErika. 2012. The bride factory: Mass media portrayals of women and weddings. New York: Peter Lang.
15.
FeaginCrawford. 1990. Dynamics of sound change in Southern States English: From r-less to r-full in three generations. In EdmonsonJerold A.FeaginCrawfordMülhaüslerPeter (eds.), Development and diversity: Language variation across time and space: A festschrift for Charles-James N. Bailey, 129–146. Arlington: SIL/University of Texas at Arlington.
16.
FowlerJoy.1986. The social stratification of /r/ in New York City department stores, 24 years after Labov. Unpublished manuscript.
17.
GilesHoward. 1973. Accent mobility: A model and some data. Anthropological Linguistics15(2). 87–105.
18.
GilesHowardCouplandNikolasCouplandJustine. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In GilesHowardCouplandJustineCouplandNikolas (eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics, 1–68. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GoffmanErving. 1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
20.
GreenLisa. 2002. African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
HayJenniferJannedyStephanieMendoza-DentonNorma. 1999. Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design, and style. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco, CA, 1389–1392.
22.
HintonLinettePollockKaren2000. Regional variation in the phonological characteristics of African American Vernacular English. World Englishes19(1). 59–71.
23.
HooverMary. 1978. Community attitudes towards Black English. Language in Society7(1). 65–87.
24.
JohnsonDaniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass3(1). 359–383.
25.
KieslingScott. 1998. Men’s identities and sociolinguistic variation: The case of fraternity men. Journal of Sociolinguistics2(1). 69–99.
26.
KieslingScott. 2005. Variation, stance and style: Word final -er, high-rising tone, and ethnicity in Australian English. English World-Wide26(1). 1–42.
27.
KieslingScott. 2009. Style as stance: Stance as the explanation for patterns of sociolinguistic variation. In JaffeAlexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 171–194. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
LabovWilliam. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
29.
LabovWilliam. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
30.
LabovWilliam. 1984. Field methods of the project in linguistic change and variation. In BaughJohnSherzerJoel (eds.), Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics, 28–53. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31.
LabovWilliam. 2001. The anatomy of style-shifting. In EckertPenelopeRickfordJohn (eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation, 85–108. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LabovWilliam2006. The atlas of North American English. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
33.
MatherPatrick-André. 2012. The social stratification of /r/ in New York City: Labov’s department store study revisited. Journal of English Linguistics40(4). 338–356.
34.
MyhillJohn. 1988. Postvocalic /r/ as an index of integration into the BEV speech community. American Speech63(3). 203–213.
35.
NagyNaomiIrwinPatricia. 2010. Boston (r): Neighbo(r)s nea(r) and fa(r). Language Variation and Change22(2). 241–278.
36.
OtnesCelePleckElizabeth. 2003. Cinderella dreams: The allure of the lavish wedding. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37.
PardoRebecca. 2013. Reality television and the metapragmatics of racism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology23(1). 65–81.
38.
PinelElizabeth. 1999. Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76(1). 114–128.
39.
PodesvaRob. 2007. Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics11(4). 478–504.
40.
PrestonDennisNiedzielskiNancy. 2003. Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
41.
QueenRobin. 2013. Working with performed language: Movies, television, and music. In MallinsonChristineChildsBeckyHerkGerard Van (eds.), Data collection in sociolinguistics: Methods and applications, 217–227. New York: Routledge.
42.
RahmanJacquelyn. 2008. Middle-class African Americans: Reactions and attitudes toward African American English. American Speech83(2). 141–176.
43.
RamptonBen. 1995. Crossing. London: Longman.
44.
RichardsonElaine. 2003. African American literacies. London: Routledge.
45.
RickfordJohn. 1999. African American Vernacular English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
46.
RickfordJohnMcNair-KnoxFaye. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift. In BiberDouglasFineganEdward (eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register, 235–276. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
Schilling-EstesNatalie. 1998. Investigating “self-conscious” speech: The performance of register in Ocracoke English. Language in Society27(1). 53–83.
48.
Schilling-EstesNatalie. 2002. Investigating stylistic variation. In ChambersJ. K.TrudgillPeterSchilling-EstesNatalie (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 375–401. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
49.
Schoux CaseyChristina. 2013. Postvocalic (r) in post-Katrina New Orleans English. Unpublished manuscript.
50.
ThornborrowJoannaMorrisDebora. 2004. Gossip as strategy: The management of talk about others on reality TV show “Big Brother.”Journal of Sociolinguistics8(2). 246–271.
51.
ValentinssonMary-Caitlyn. 2010. “The tits are coming out tonight”: Indexing gender on the “Jersey Shore.” Paper presented at New Ways in Analyzing Variation 39, San Antonio, TX, November 4–6.
52.
WellsJohn C.1982. Accents of English, vol. 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
