The English have-perfect can be traced to Old English [habban ‘have’ + noun + perfect participle]. A comparative look at the development of the have-perfect in Romance suggests a way to reassess the Old English corpus, which in turn reveals that the string [habban + noun + perfect participle] had three distinct structures and values aside from the periphrastic perfect. The author shows that the likeliest source of the have-perfect is a periphrasis denoting the achievement of a result or a persisting resultant state. This implies that the relationship between possessive and auxiliary habban is less direct than previously claimed.
MayhoffKarl Friedrich Theodor (ed.). 1906. Naturalis historia. Leipzig: Teubner.
7.
SweetHenry (ed.). 1871. King Alfred’s West-Saxon version of Gregory’s pastoral care, vol. 1. London: Trübner.
8.
SweetHenry (ed.). 1883. King Alfred’s Orosius. London: Trübner.
9.
AkimotoMinojiBrintonLaurel J.1999. The origin of the composite predicate in Old English. In BrintonLaurel J.AkimotoMinoji (eds.), Collocational and idiomatic aspects of composite predicates in the history of English, 21-58. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10.
BenvenisteÉmile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
11.
BrintonLaurel. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BybeeJoanPerkinsReverePagliucaWilliam. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
CardonaGeorge. 1970. The Indo-Iranian construction mana (mama) krtam. Language46(1). 1-12.
14.
ComrieBernard. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
ComrieBernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
CoseriuEugenio. 1973. Sincronía, diacronía e historia: el problema del cambio lingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.
17.
DahlÖsten. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
18.
de AcostaDiego. 2011. Rethinking the genesis of the Romance periphrastic perfect. Diachronica28(2). 143-185.
19.
DietrichWolf. 1973. El aspecto verbal perifrástico en las lenguas románicas. Madrid: Gredos.
20.
DrinkaBridget. 2001. The formation of periphrastic perfects and passives in Europe: An areal approach. In BlakeBarry J.BurridgeKate (eds.), Historical linguistics2001, 105-128. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
21.
DrinkaBridget. 2007. The *-to/-no construction in Indo-European: Verbal adjective or past passive participle? In VitBubenikJohnHewsonSarahRose (eds.), Grammatical change in Indo-European languages, 141-157. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
22.
ElsnessJohan. 1997. The perfect and preterite in contemporary and earlier English. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
23.
ErnoutAlfredThomasFrançois. 1953. Syntaxe latine. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksieck.
24.
FridénGeorg. 1948. Studies on the tenses of the English verb from Chaucer to Shakespeare. Uppsala: Bokhandeln.
25.
HarrisAliceCampbellLyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HarrisMartin. 1982. The “past simple” and “present perfect” in Romance. In VincentNigelHarrisMartin (eds.), Studies in the Romance verb, 42-70. London: Croom Helm.
27.
HarrisonJames. 1887. The Anglo-Saxon perfect participle withhabban. Modern Language Notes2(6). 134-135.
28.
HeineBernd. 1997. Possession: Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
HeineBerndClaudiUlrikeHünnemeyerFriederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30.
HetzronRobert. 1969. Morphology of the verb in Modern Syriac. Journal of the American Oriental Society89(1). 112-127.
31.
HoffmannGerhard. 1934. Die Entwicklung des umschriebenen Perfektums im Altenglischen und Frühmittelenglischen. Wroclaw: University of Breslau dissertation.
32.
HopperPaulTraugottElizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization, 2nd edn.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
JespersenOtto. 1931. A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
34.
La FauciNunzio. 1988. Oggetti e soggetti nella formazione della morfosintassi romanza. Pisa: Giardini.
35.
LapesaRafael. 1980. Historia de la lengua española, 8th edn.Madrid: Gredos.
36.
LeeJeong-Hoon. 2002. The “have” perfect in Old English: How close was it to the Modern English perfect? In MinkovaDonkaStockwellRobert (eds.), Studies in the history of the English Language, 373-393. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
37.
LindstedtJouko. 2000. The perfect—aspectual, temporal and evidential. In DahlÖsten (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 365-383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
38.
LoporcaroMichele. 1995. Grammaticalizzazione delle perifrasi verbali perferttive romanze e accordo del participio passato. Archivio Glottologico Italiano80(1-2). 144-167.
39.
MarchFrancis. 1873. A comparative grammar of the Anglo-Saxon language. New York: Harper.
40.
Meyer-LübkeWilhelm. 1906. Grammaire des langues romanes, vol. 3. Paris: H. Welter.
41.
MitchellBruce. 1985. Old English syntax, vol. 2. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
42.
MustanojaTauno. 1960. A Middle English syntax, part I: Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
43.
Oxford English dictionary, 2nd edn.1989. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
PinksterHarm. 1987. Strategy and chronology of the development of future and perfect tense auxiliaries in Latin. In HarrisMartinRamatPaul (eds.), Historical development of auxiliaries, 193-223. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
45.
PulgramErnst. 1978. Latin-Romance habere: Double function and lexical split. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie94(1-2). 1-8.
46.
QuilesCarlosLópez-MencheroFernando. 2009. A grammar of Modern Indo-European, 2nd edn.Badajoz, Spain: Asociación Cultural Dnghu.
47.
RohlfsGerhard. 1969. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Turin: Picola Biblioteca Einaudi.
48.
SihlerAndrew. 1995. New comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
SweetHenry. 1882. An Anglo-Saxon primer with grammar, notes, and glossary. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
50.
TraugottElizabeth Closs. 1972. A history of English syntax: A transformational approach to the history of English sentence structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
51.
VincentNigel. 1982. The development of the auxiliaries habere and esse in Romance. In VincentNigelHarrisMartin (eds.), Studies in the Romance verb, 71-96. London: Croom Helm.
52.
VisserFredericus Theodorus. 1973. An historical syntax of the English language, pt. 3, vol. 2. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
53.
WatkinsCalvert. 2000. The American Heritage dictionary of Indo-European roots, 2nd edn.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
54.
WattieJ. M.1931. Tense. Essays and Studies16. 121-143.
55.
WattsSheila. 2001. How to become an auxiliary: Progressive and perfect in Old Saxon. In WattsSheila. (eds.), Zur Verbmorphologie germanischer Sprachen, 117-136. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
56.
WhitneyWilliam Dwight. 1875. The life and growth of language: An outline of linguistic science. London: Henry S. King.
57.
WischerIlse. 2002. The have-“perfect” in Old English. In KayChristianHorobinSimonSmithJeremy (eds.), New perspectives on English historical linguistics, 243-255. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
58.
WischerIlse. 2007. The grammaticalization of the perfect in the history of English. In StalmaszczykPiotrWitczak-PlisieckaIwona (eds.), PASE Studies in Linguistics, 7-17. Lodz: Lodz University Press.
59.
WoodcockEric Charles. 1959. A new Latin syntax. London: Methuen.
60.
WrightJoseph. 1914. Old English grammar. London: Oxford University Press.
