In this study, the author considers several limitations in current research in the field of legal discourse: a static rather than interactive view of language, a focus on questioners/attorneys over answerers/witnesses, and a concern with verbal resources instead of an integration of verbal and visual or multimodal communicative practices (e.g., gaze, facial expression, body alignment, and realignment). Analyzing an excerpt from a crucial witness in a rape trial, the author considers the neglected role of multimodal and interactive legal discourse and how the witness implements numerous discursive and extralinguistic resources for manipulating, negotiating, and resisting the putative asymmetry of the trial speech exchange system. In the process the author provides a glimpse of not just intricate laminations of participation, but dynamic laminations of power as both attorney and witness negotiate epistemological relations and co-construct identity in the rape trial.
Archer, Dawn.2005. Questions and answers in the English courtroom (1640-1760) . Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins .
2.
Bogach, Bryna.1997. Gendered lawyering: Difference and dominance in lawyer-client interaction in an Israeli legal aid setting. Law and Society Review31. 677-712.
3.
Conley, John & William O'Barr .1998. Just words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Cotterill, Janet.2003. Language and power in court. New York : Palgrave Macmillan.
5.
Ehrlich, Susan.2001. Representing rape. New York : Routledge.
6.
Ehrlich, Susan & Jack Sidnell.2006. "I think that's not an assumption you ought to make": Challenging presuppositions in inquiry testimony. Language in Society35. 655-676.
7.
Erickson, Frederick & Jeffrey Schultz .1982. The counselor as gatekeeper . New York: Academic Press.
8.
Fairclough, Norman.2003. Analysing discourse. New York : Routledge.
9.
Goffman, Erving.1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
10.
Goffman, Erving.1963. Behavior in public places. New York : Free Press.
11.
Goffman, Erving.1981. Forms of talk. Philadelphia : University of Pennsylvania Press.
12.
Goodwin, Charles.1981. Conversational organization. New York : Academic Press.
13.
Goodwin, Charles.2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction . Journal of Pragmatics32. 1489-1522.
14.
Goodwin, Charles & Marjorie Goodwin .2004. Participation. In Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 222-244. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
15.
ten Have, Paul.2001. Applied conversation analysis. In Alexander McHoul & Mark Rapley (eds.), How to analyze talk in institutional settings , 3-11. London : Continuum.
16.
Heath, Christian.1986. Body movement and speech in medical interaction . New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Heritage, John.2004. Conversational analysis and institutional talk . In David Silverman (ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, 2nd edn., 222-245. London: Sage.
18.
Hester, Stephen & David Francis .2001. "Is institutional talk a phenomenon?": Reflections on ethnomethodology and applied conversation analysis . In Alexander McHoul & Mark Rapley (eds.), How to analyze talk in institutional settings, 206-217. London: Continuum.
19.
Heydon, Georgina.2004. The language of police interviewing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
Hirsch, Susan.1998. Pronouncing and persevering: Gender and the discourses of disputing in an African Islamic court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
Hobbs, Pamela.2003. "Is that what we're here about?": A lawyer's use of impression management in a closing argument at trial. Discourse & Society14(3). 273-290.
22.
Irvine, Judith.1996. Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles. In Michael Silverstein & Greg Urban (eds.), Natural histories of discourse , 131-160. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
Kendon, Adam.2004. Gesture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Luchjenbroers, June & Michelle Aldridge .2007. Conceptual manipulation by metaphors and frames: Dealing with rape victims in legal discourse. Text and Talk27(3). 339-359.
26.
Matoesian, Gregory.1993. Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Matoesian, Gregory.2001. Law and the language of identity: Discourse in the William Kennedy Smith rape trial. New York: Oxford University Press.
28.
Matoesian, Gregory. Forthcoming. Role conflict as an interactional resource in the multimodal emergence of expert identity. Semiotica171.
29.
Maynard, Douglas.2003. Bad news, good news. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
30.
Mehan, Hugh.1979. Learning lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Mendoza-Denton, Norma.2002. Language and identity. In Jack Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 475-499. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32.
Mertz, Elizabeth.2007. The language of law school: Learning to "think like a lawyer." New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Pascal, Esther.2006. Questions in legal monologues: Fictive interaction as argumentative strategy in a murder trial. Text and Talk26(3). 383-402.
34.
Philips, Susan.1972. Participant structures and communicative competence: Warm Springs children in community and classroom. In Courtney Cazden, Vera John & Dell Hymes (eds.), Functions of anguage in the classroom, 370-394. New York: Columbia Teachers Press.
35.
Precht, Kristen.2003. Stance moods in spoken English: Evidentiality and affect in British and American conversation. Text23(2). 239-257.
36.
Raymond, Geoffrey.2006. Questions at work: Yes/no type interrogatives in institutional contexts. In Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond & Darin Weinberg (eds.), Talk and interaction in social research methods, 115-134. London: Sage.
37.
Silverstein, Michael.1998. The improvisational performance of culture in realtime discursive practice. In Keith Sawyer (ed.), Creativity in performance, 266-312. London: Ablex.
38.
Tannen, Deborah.1989. Talking voices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Taslitz, Andrew.1999. Rape and the culture of the courtroom. New York: New York University Press.
40.
Trinch, Shonna.2003. Latinas' narratives of domestic abuse. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins .
41.
Wortham, Stanton.2001. Narratives in action. New York : Teachers College Press.
