The most important challenges for linguistics in the coming years involve making better contact with colleagues, with other frameworks and subdisciplines within linguistics, with theories of meaning and conceptualization, with psycholinguistics, with theories of other domains of cognition, with neuroscience, and with education.
Adger, Carolyn, Catherine E. Snow, and Donna Christian, eds. 2002. What Teachers Need to Know about Language. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
2.
Bybee, Joan, and James McClelland .2005. Alternatives to the Combinatorial Paradigm of Linguistic Theory Based on Domain General Principles of Human Cognition. The Linguistic Review22: 381—410.
3.
Chomsky, Noam.1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
4.
———. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Corballis, Michael C.1991. The Lopsided Ape. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Culicover, Peter W., and Ray Jackendoff.2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
Goldin-Meadow, Susan.2005. What Language Creation in the Manual Modality Tells Us about the Foundations of Language. The Linguistic Review22: 199—226.
8.
Haussamen, Brock, with Amy Benjamin, Martha Kolln, Rebecca S. Wheeler, and members of NCTE's Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar.2003. Grammar Alive! A Guide for Teachers. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
9.
Hawkins, Jack. Forthcoming. Language Universals and the Performance-Grammar Correspondence Hypothesis. In Language Universals, edited by Chris Collins, Morton Christiansen , and Gerald Edelman.New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Jackendoff, Ray.1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
———. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
———. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
13.
———. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
———. 2002. Foundations of Language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
———. 2007a. Language, Consciousness, Culture: Essays on Mental Structure . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
———. 2007b. A Parallel Architecture Perspective on Language Processing . Brain Research1146: 2-22.
17.
———. 2007c. The Role of Linguistics in Cognitive Science: The State of the Art. The Linguistic Review24.
18.
Jackendoff, Ray, and Steven Pinker.2005. The Nature of the Language Faculty and Its Implications for the Evolution of Language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition97: 211—25.
19.
Lerdahl, Fred.2001. Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20.
Lerdahl, Fred, and Ray Jackendoff.1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Marr, David.1982. Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
21.
Piñango, Maria M.2000. Canonicity in Broca's Sentence Comprehension: The Case of Psychological Verbs. In Language and the Brain, edited by Y. Grodzinsky, L. Shapiro, and D. Swinney, 327—50. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22.
Piñango, Maria M., Jennifer Mack, and Ray Jackendoff. Forthcoming. Semantic Combinatorial Processes in Argument Structure: Evidence from Light Verbs. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society32S.
23.
Pinker, Steven.1997. How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.
24.
Pinker, Steven, and Ray Jackendoff.2005. The Faculty of Language: What's Special about It?Cognition95: 201—36.
25.
Pylkkänen, Liina, and Brian McElree.2006. The Syntax-Semantics Interface: On-line Composition of Sentence Meaning. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2d ed., edited by M. Traxler and M. A. Gernsbacher, 539—80. New York: Elsevier.
26.
Ritter, Nancy, A.2005. On the Status of Linguistics as a Cognitive Science. The Linguistic Review22:117—34.
27.
Tomasello, Michael.2005. Beyond Formalities: The Case of Language Acquisition. The Linguistic Review22:183—98.
