Contrary to the traditional account of habitual aspect in English, the only marker of habituality is will, with its past tense, would. Used tofunctions as a kind of anti-presentperfect tense, contrasting past states of affairs with present ones. In certain contexts, various tenses, and not merely the simple ones, may receive habitual interpretations, but these are not their meanings. Generic readings are contextual interpretations; there are no markers of generic aspect in English.
Bennett, Michael, and Barbara Hall Partee. 1978. Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
2.
Benveniste, Emile. 1959. Les rélations de temps dans le verbe français. Bulletin de la société linguistique de Paris54:69-82.
3.
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
4.
Binnick, Robert I. Forthcoming. Used toand Habitual Aspect in English. Style.
5.
Brinton, Laurel J.1987. The Aspectual Nature of States and Habits. Folia Linguistica21:195-214.
6.
Brinton, Laurel J.1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
8.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Copley, Bridget. 2004. Aspect and Scope in Future Conditionals. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/GQ3ZDY5Z/copley.aspect.scope.future.conditionals.5.27.04.pdf
11.
Cutrer, L. Michelle. 1994. Time and Tense in Narrative and in Everyday Language. PhD diss., University of California, San Diego.
12.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
13.
Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax. Harlow, UK: Longman.
14.
Dowty, David R.1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
15.
Ferrari-Bridgers, Franca. 2004. [V-N] Compound Nouns Formation in Italian. Paper presented at 20th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, January 7-9, Helsinki, Finland. http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/kielitiede/20scl/abstracts.shtml.
16.
Freed, Alice F.1979. The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
Hirtle, W. H.1967. The Simple and Progressive Forms: An Analytical Approach. Québec: Les presses de l'université Laval.
19.
Hirtle, W. H.1975. Time, Aspect, and the Verb. Québec: Les presses de l'université Laval.
20.
Jespersen, Otto. [1932] 1961. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles: Part IV. Syntax (Third Volume). Reprint, London: Allen & Unwin.
21.
Jørgensen, Erik. 1988. Used to (+ infinitive). English Studies69:348-354.
22.
Leech, Geoffrey N.1987. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.
23.
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns. Journal of Philosophy70: 601-609.
25.
Schibsbye, Knud. 1970. A Modern English Grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26.
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Helen Lawrence. 2000. “I Used to Dance, but I Don't Dance Now”: The Habitual Past in English. Journal of English Linguistics28:324-353.
27.
Van Geenhoven, Veerle. 2001. Aspect, Pluractionality, and Adverbial Quantification. Paper presented at Perspectives on Aspect, December 12-14, Utrecht, The Netherlands. http://www-uilots.let.uu.nl/conferences/Perspectives_on_Aspect/Proceedings/geenhoven.pdf
28.
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
29.
Wallace, Stephen. 1982. Figure and Ground: The Interrelationships of Linguistic Categories. In Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics, edited by Paul J. Hopper, 201-223. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
30.
Weinrich, Harald. 1964. Tempus: besprochene und erzählte Welt. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
31.
Weinrich, Harald. 1973. Le temps: le récit et le commentaire. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
