This multiregister corpus study investigates the social factors affecting concord variation found in existential there + be (ETB) constructions in present-day American English. The study questions previous work in this area, which suggests that a lack of concord is reflective of informal, conversational situations of use. The five registers analyzed (conversation, academic lectures, academic writing, fiction, and chat language) showed that the two spoken registers resulted in the greatest number of variation in agreement. A comparison of the linguistic contexts of ETBs in the two spoken registers finds both similarities and differences of function across two spoken registers. The article concludes by adopting the position that the contracted ETB construction is an unanalyzed chunk or formulaic sequence of language.
Barlow, Michael. 2000. MonoConc Pro 2.0. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
2.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Viviana Cortes. 2004. If You Look at...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks. Applied Linguistics25 (3): 401-435.
3.
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd, and Marie Helt. 2002. Speaking and Writing in the University: A Multidimensional Comparison. TESOL Quarterly36 (1): 9-48.
4.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
5.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. New York: Longman.
6.
Carter, Ronald. 1999. Standard Grammars, Spoken grammars: Some Educational Implications. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by Tony Bex and Richard Watts, 149-166. London: Routledge.
7.
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy. 1995. Grammar and Spoken Language. Applied Linguistics16 (2): 141-158.
8.
Cheshire, Jenny. 1999. Spoken Standard English. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by Tony Bex and Richard Watts, 129-148. London: Routledge.
9.
Givón, Talmy. 1993. English Grammar: A Functional-Based Introduction. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10.
Hannay, Michael. 1985. English Existentials in Functional Grammar. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.
11.
Kurjian, Jerry. 2002. A Corpus of Chat Room Language. Northern Arizona University.
12.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2000. Grammars of Spoken English: New Outcomes of Corpus-Oriented Research. Language Learning50 (4): 675-724.
13.
Martinez Insua, Ana E., and Ignacio M. Palacios Martinez. 2003. A Corpus-Based Approach to Non-concord in Present-Day English ExistentialThere-Constructions. English Studies84 (3): 262-283.
14.
Meecham, Marjory, and Michele Foley. 1994. On Resolving Disagreement: Linguistic Theory and Variation—There’s Bridges. Language Variation and Change6:63-85.
15.
Sankoff, David, and David Rand. 1999. Goldvarb 2.0: A Variable Rule Application for the Macintosh. Montreal, Canada: Université de Montréal, Centre de recherches mathématiques.
16.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
17.
Schmitt, Norbert, ed. 2004. Formulaic Sequences. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
18.
Trudgill, Peter. 1999. Standard English: What It Isn’t. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, edited by Tony Bex and Richard Watts, 117-128. London: Routledge.
