A pronoun pattern that is common in both spoken and written English is some form of they with singular, generic antecedents, as in, “Everyone was so pleased with themselves.” This article addresses the question of how long such a pattern has been in the language and how a pattern that clearly violates number agreement could become so ubiquitous. An examination of recent scholarship as well as the historical record reveals that the origins of this usage rest in the fourteenth century and that its frequency has increased since then. Using current theories of agreement, the author presents a hypothesis for how and when this pattern could have entered the language. Further examination of the historical record supports the hypothesis that loss of grammatical gender in the thirteenth century was crucial for the introduction of generic they into the language.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, Gerry. 1984. Language Close Up: Unisex ‘They.’ ELT Journal38 (1): 45-48 .
2.
Axelrod, Rise B., and Charles R. Cooper. 1998. A Writer’s Guidebook. New York: St. Martin’s .
3.
Barlow, Michael. 1992. A Situated Theory of Agreement. New York: Garland .
4.
Baugh, Albert C., and Thomas Cable. 1993. A History of the English Language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
5.
Blake, N. F. 1980. The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer. London: Edward Arnold .
6.
Bodine, Ann. 1990. Androcentrism in Prescriptive Grammar: Singular ‘They,’Sex-Indefinite ‘He,’and ‘He or She.’ In The Feminist Critique of Language, edited by Deborah Cameron, 166-186. London: Routledge .
7.
Braun, Friedericke. 2001. The Communication of Gender in Turkish. In Gender Across Languages. Vol. 1. Edited by Marlis Hellinger and Hadumod Bußmann, 283-310. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
Hairston, Maxine. 1981. Not All Errors Are Created Equal: Nonacademic Readers in the Professions Respond to Lapses in Usage . College English43 (8): 794-806 .
17.
Heltveit, Trygve. 1958. Attribute and Anaphora in the Gender-System of English . Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap18: 357-369 .
Lapham, Lewis H. 2001. Drums along the Potomac . Harper’s303 (1818): 35-41 .
20.
Leonard, Sterling. 1929. The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage, 1700-1800. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature , No. 25.
Lunsford, Andrea. 2001. The Everyday Writer. Boston: Bedford .
23.
Martyna, Wendy. 1978. What does ‘He’ Mean? Use of the Generic Masculine . Journal of Communication28 (1): 131-138 .
24.
Matossian, Lou Ann. 1997. Burglars, Babysitters, and Persons: A Sociolinguistic Study of Generic Pronoun Usage in Philadelphia and Minneapolis. Doctoral diss., University of Pennsylvania. UMI Dissertation Services.
25.
Meyers, Miriam W. 1990. Current Generic Pronoun Usage: An Empirical Study . American Speech65: 228-237 .
26.
Miller, Casey, Kate Swift, and Rosalie Maggio. 1997. Liberating Language . Ms. (October): 50-54 .
27.
Moore, Samuel. 1921. Grammatical and Natural Gender in Middle English . PMLA. 36: 79-103 .
28.
Newman, Michael. 1997. Epicene Pronouns: The Linguistics of a Prescriptive Problem. New York: Garland .
29.
Nicolson, J. U. 1934. Geoffrey Chaucer: Canterbury Tales. Garden City, NY: Garden City .
30.
Oelkers, Susanne. 1996. Der Sprintstar und Ihre Freundinnen . Muttersprache106: 1-15 .
31.
Oxford English Dictionary. 2002.
32.
Poutsma, Hendrik. 1914. A Grammar of Late Modern English. Groningen, the Netherlands: P. Noordhoff .
33.
Robinson, F. N. 1957. Works. Boston: Houghton Mifflin .
34.
Romaine, Suzanne. 2001. A Corpus-Based View of Gender in British and American English. In Gender Across Languages. Vol. 1. Edited by Marlis Hellinger and Hadumod Bußmann, 153-175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins .
35.
Salu, M. B. 1956. The Ancrene Riwle. Indiana: University of Notre Dame .
36.
Shepherd, Geoffrey, ed. 1959. Ancrene Wisse. Edinburgh, Scotland: Thomas Nelson and Sons .
