Garrett, Andrew. 1990. The Origin of NP Split Ergativity. Language66:261-296.
2.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1957. The Nature and Uses of Linguistic Typologies. International Journal of American Linguistics23:68-77.
3.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1963a. Some Universals of Grammar with Particular Reference to the Order of Meaningful Elements. In Universals of Language, 2d ed., edited by J. Greenberg, 73-113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Greenberg, Joseph, ed. 1963b. Universals of Language. 2d ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Greenberg, Joseph. 1991. Some Problems of Indo-European in Historical Perspective. In Sprung from Some Common Source: Investigations into the Prehistory of Languages, edited by SydneyM. Lamb and E. Douglas Mitchell, 125-140. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Klein, Jared S. 1980. Review of Paul Friedrich, The Meaning of Aphrodite. American Anthropologist82:191-192.
7.
Klein, Jared S. 1997. Review of Henk Aertsen and Robert J. Jeffers, eds., Historical Linguistics 1989: Papers from the 9th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Kratylos42:9-15.
8.
Laroche, Emanuel. 1962. Un ‘ergatif’ en indo-européen d’Asie Mineure. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris57:23-43.
9.
Meillet, Antoine. 1914. Le problème de la parenté des langues. Scientia (Rivista di scienza)15:403-25. [Reprinted in Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris, Librarie Honoré Champion, 1965.]
10.
Morgenstierne, Georg. 1975. Ancient Contacts between N. E. Iranian and Indo-Aryan? In Mélanges linguistiques offerts à Emile Benveniste, edited by M. Dj. Moïnfar, 431-434. Louvain: Peeters.
11.
Nichols, Johanna. 1996. The Comparative Method as Heuristic. In The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, edited by Mark Durie and Malcolm Ross, 39-71. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
Nichols, Johanna, and David A. Peterson. 1996. The Amerind Personal Pronouns. Language72:336-371.
