Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Conventional linguistic and metrical perspectives claim that secondary elements of Old English compound names are only stressed if they are disyllabic or inflected. This essay argues that this conclusion derives directly from the use of Eduard Sievers's metrical formalism and that other formalisms may suggest that this counterintuitive result is, in fact, incorrect. Using Geoffrey Russom's innovative word-foot metrical formalism and examining evidence from secondary alliteration patterns, this essay offers evidence that monosyllabic secondary elements were given secondary stress. Furthermore, evidence from the spacing of compound names in the Beowulf manuscript supports such a conclusion. Taken together, the evidence from scansion, alliteration patterns, and the manuscript suggest that both Sieversian formalism and the linguistic claims that it gave rise to should be replaced.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bliss, Alan. 1962. The Metre of Beowulf. 2d ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Bredehoft, Thomas A. 2001a. Estimating Probabilities and Alliteration Frequencies in Old English Verse. Old English Newsletter 34 (1): 19-23.

Bredehoft, Thomas A. 2001b. Textual Histories: Readings in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Cable, Thomas. 1991. The English Alliterative Tradition. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Campbell, A. 1959. Old English Grammar. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

Donoghue, Daniel. 1987. Style in Old English Poetry: The Test of the Auxiliary. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Fulk, R. D. 1992. A History of Old English Meter. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Hoover, David L. 1985. A New Theory of Old English Meter. New York: Peter Lang.

Hutcheson, B. R. 1995. Old English Poetic Metre. Cambridge, UK: D. S. Brewer.

10.

Kendall, Calvin. 1991. The Metrical Grammar of “Beowulf.” Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England No. 5. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Klaeber, F. 1950. Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg. 3d ed. Boston: D. C. Heath.

12.

Krapp, George Philip, and E. V. K. Dobbie, eds. 1931-1953. The Anglo-Saxon Poetic Records. 6 vols. New York: Columbia University Press.

13.

Lass, Roger. 1994. Old English: A Historical Linguistic Companion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Okasha, Elisabeth. 1971. Hand-List of Anglo-Saxon Non-Runic Inscriptions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

15.

Page, R. I. 1999. An Introduction to English Runes. 2d ed. Woodbridge, UK: Boydell.

16.

Plummer, Charles, ed. 1892-1899. Two of the Saxon Chronicles Parallel. 2 vols. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.

17.

Pope, John C. 1966. The Rhythm of Beowulf. 2d ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

18.

Pope, John C. 1981. Seven Old English Poems. 2d ed. New York: W. W. Norton.

19.

Russom, Geoffrey. 1987. Old English Meter and Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Russom, Geoffrey. 1998. Beowulf and Old Germanic Metre. Cambridge Studies in Anglo-Saxon England No. 23. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

21.

Zupitza, Julius. 1959. Beowulf, Reproduced in Facsimile. 2d ed., with notes by Norman Davis. Early English Text Society o.s. 245. Oxford, UK: Early English Text Society.

Secondary Stress in Compound Germanic Names in Old English Verse

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References