Adams, W. Royce.1993. Viewpoints. 2d ed.Levington, MA: D. C. Heath.
2.
Andersson, Evert.1985. On Verb Complementation in Written English. Lund, Sweden: CWK Gleerup.
3.
Augros, Robert , and George Stanciu. 1988. The New Biology. Boston: New Science Library.
4.
Bach, Emmon . 1979. Control in Montague Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry10: 515-531.
5.
Bach, Emmon . 1980. In Defense of Passive. Linguistics and Philosophy3:297-342.
6.
Bolinger, Dwight . 1968. Entailment and the Meaning of Structures. Glossa2: 119-127.
7.
Bresnan, Joan . 1982. Control and Complementation. Linguistic Inquiry13: 343-434.
8.
British National Corpus . 1995. [Online]. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Available: http://info.ox.ac.uk/bnc
9.
Brown University Corpus of American English. 1964. Providence, RI: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.
10.
Buyssens, Eric . 1987. The Preposition for with an Infinitive Clause. English Studies68:336-347.
11.
Chierchia, Gennaro . 1989. Structured Meanings, Thematic Roles and Control. In Properties, Types and Meaning II, edited by Gennaro Chierchia, Barbara H. Partee, and Raymond Turner, 131-166. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
12.
Chierchia, Gennaro, and Sally McConnel-Ginet . 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13.
Chomsky, Noam . 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
14.
Chomsky, Noam . 1980. On Binding. Linguistic Inquiry11:1-46.
15.
Chomsky, Noam . 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Foris.
16.
Curme, George O.1931. Syntax. Boston: D. C. Heath.
17.
Dixon, R.M.W.1984. The Semantic Basis of Syntactic Properties. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society10:583-593.
18.
Duffley, Patrick J.1992. The English Infinitive. London: Longman.
19.
Duffley, Patrick J.1995. Defining the Potential Meaning of the -ing Form in English. Langues et linguistique21:1-11.
20.
Duffley, Patrick J.1999. The Use of the Infinitive and the -ing after Verbs Denoting the Beginning, Middle and End of an Event. Folia Linguistica33:295-331.
21.
Farkas, Donka.1988. On Obligatory Control. Linguistics and Philosophy11: 27-58.
22.
Forster, E. M.[1924] 1946. A Passage to India. London: Edward Arnold.
23.
Givón, Talmy . 1990. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
24.
Gleick, James.1987. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Penguin.
25.
Haegeman, Liliane . 1983. The Semantics of Will in Present-Day British English. Brussels, Belgium: Verhandelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Wetenschappen, Letteren en Schone Kunsten van België.
26.
Hirtle, Walter H.1975. Time, Aspect and the Verb. Québec, Canada: Presses de l’Université Laval.
27.
Huddleston, Rodney . 1988. English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Huddleston, Rodney . 1995. The Case against a Future Tense in English. Studies in Language19:399-446.
29.
Hudson, Richard A.1975. The Meaning of Questions. Language51:1-32.
30.
Jackendoff, Ray.1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31.
Jackendoff, Ray . 1974. A Deep Structure Projection Rule. Linguistic Inquiry5:481-506.
32.
Jaworska, Eva . 1986. Prepositional Phrases as Subjects and Objects. Journal of Linguistics22:355-374.
33.
Jespersen, Otto . 1927. A Modern English Grammar, Part III. London: Allen and Unwin.
34.
Jespersen, Otto . 1940. A Modern English Grammar, Part V. London: Allen and Unwin.
35.
Kiparsky, Paul , and Carol Kiparsky. 1971. Fact. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, edited by Danny D. Steinberg and Leon A. Jacobvits, 345-369. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Langacker, Ronald W.1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
Lehrer, Adrienne . 1987. Why to Is Not a Verb. In Aspects of Language, Vol. 2, edited by Mario Alinei and Nils Arhammar, 249-260. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
38.
Mair, Christian . 1990. Infinitival Complement Clauses in English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Matthews, Peter H.1981. Syntax. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Postal, Paul M.1970. On Coreferential Complement Subject Deletion. Linguistic Inquiry1:439-500.
41.
Poutsma, Hendrik . 1929. A Grammar of Late Modern English, Part I, 2.2ded.Groningen: Noordhoff.
42.
Quirk, Randolph , Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
43.
Rosenbaum, Peter S.1967a. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge: MIT Press.
44.
Rosenbaum, Peter S.1967b. Phrase Structure Principles of English Complex Sentence Formation. Journal of Linguistics3:103-118.
45.
Rudanko, Juhani . 1989. Complementation and Case Grammar. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46.
Rudanko, Juhani . 1996. Prepositions and Complement Clauses. Albany: State University of New York Press.
47.
Sag, Ivan A. , and Carl Pollard. 1991. An Integrated Theory of Complement Control. Language67:63-113.
48.
Schachter, Paul . 1976. A Nontransformational Account of Gerundive Nominals in English. Linguistic Inquiry7:205-241.
49.
Scheurweghs, George . 1959. Present-Day English Syntax. London: Longman.
50.
Schibsbye, Knud . 1970. A Modern English Grammar. 2d ed.London: Constable & Co.
51.
Sichting, Johanna. 1985. Semantische-syntaktische Verwendungsweisen und Kommunikative Leistung des Gerundiums. In Nominalisierungen im Englischen, edited collectively, 113-41. Leipzig: VEB Verlag Enzyklopädie.
52.
Stowell, Tim . 1982. The Tense of Infinitives. Linguistic Inquiry13:561-570.
53.
Thompson, Sandra A.1973. On Subjectless Gerunds in English. Foundations of Language9:374-383.
54.
Visser, Fredericus Th.1969. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part III, 1. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
55.
Wierzbicka, Anna . 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
