Agrimi, J. , and C. Crisciani. 1994. Les consilia médicaux. Traduit de l’italien par Caroline Viola. Typologie des sources du moyen âge occidental, Fasc. 69-A-V.D.3. Turnhout: Brepols.
2.
Atkinson, D.1992. The Evolution of Medical Research Writing from 1735 to 1985: The Case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics13: 337-374.
3.
Atkinson, D.1996. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975: A Sociohistorical Discourse Analysis. Language and Society25: 333-371.
4.
Bazerman, C.1988. Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5.
Atkinson, D.1998. Emerging Perspectives on the Many Dimensions of Scientific Discourse. In Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science, edited by J. R. Martin and Robert Veel, 15-28. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
6.
Bazerman, C. , and J. Paradis, eds. 1991. Textual Dynamics of the Professions: Historical and Contemporary Studies of Writing in Professional Communities. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
7.
Bernard, C.1957. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine. Translated by Henry Copley Green. New York: Dover.
8.
Bhatia, V. K.1993. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
9.
Biber, D.1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Biber, D. , and E. Finegan. 1989. Styles of Stance in English: Lexical and Grammatical Marking of Evidentiality and Affect. Text9 (1): 93-124.
11.
Bynum, W. F. , S. Lock, and R. Porter. 1992. Medical Journals and Medical Knowledge: Historical Essays. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
12.
Chafe, W. L.1985. Linguistic Differences Produced by Differences Between Speaking and Writing. In Literature, Language and Learning: The Nature and Consequences of Reading and Writing, edited by D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, and A. Hildyard, 105-123. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Crombie, A. C.1994. Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition. 3 vols. London: Duckworth.
14.
De Lancey, S.1981. An Interpretation of Split Ergativity and Related Patterns. Language57 (3): 620-657.
15.
Eggins, S. , and J. R. Martin. 1997. Genres and Registers of Discourse. In Discourse as Structure and Process, edited by Teun A. van Dijk, 230-256. London: Sage.
16.
Ferguson, C. A.1994. Dialect, Register, and Genre: Working Assumptions about Conventionalization. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, edited by D. Biber and E. Finegan, 15-30. New York: Oxford University Press.
17.
Fowler, R.1986. Linguistic Criticism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
Gläser, R.1995. Linguistic Features and Genre Profiles of Scientific English. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
19.
Gunnarsson, B. -L. , P. Linell, and B. Nordberg. 1997. The Construction of Professional Discourse. London: Longman.
20.
Halliday, M.A.K.1988. On the Language of Physical Science. In Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, edited by M. Ghadessy, 162-178. London: Pinter.
21.
Halliday, M.A.K. , and J. R. Martin. 1993. Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
22.
Myers, G.1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23.
Simpson, P.1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
24.
Swales, J.1991. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Setting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Taavitsainen, I.1994a. On the Evolution of Scientific Writings from 1375 to 1675: Repertoire of Emotive Features. In English Historical Linguistics 1992, edited by F. Fernández, M. Foster, and J. J. Calvo, 329-342. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26.
Taavitsainen, I.1994b. Subjectivity as a Text-Type Marker in Historical Stylistics. Language and Literature3 (3): 197-212.
27.
Taavitsainen, I.1999. Dialogues in Late Medieval and Early Modern English Medical Writing. In Historical Dialogue Analysis, edited by by G. Fritz, A. H. Jucker, and F. Lebsanft, 243-268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28.
Taavitsainen, I. , and P. Pahta. 1997a. The Corpus of Early English Medical Writing: Linguistic Variation and Prescriptive Collocations in Scholastic Style. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, edited by T. Nevalainen and L. Kahlas-Tarkka, 209-225. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 52. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
29.
Taavitsainen, I. , and P. Pahta. 1997b. The Corpus of Early English Medical Writing. ICAME Journal21: 71-78.
30.
Taavitsainen, I. , and P. Pahta. 1998. Vernacularisation of Medical Writing in English: A Corpus-Based Study of Scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine3 (2): 157-185.
