Atkinson , Dwight. 1992. The Evolution of Medical Research Writing from 1735 to 1985: The Case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal. Applied Linguistics13:337-374.
2.
Atkinson , Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Biber , Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Biber , Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Biber , Douglas, Susan Conrad, and Randi Reppen. 1998. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Biber, Douglas , and Edward Finegan. 1989. Drift and the Evolution of English Style: A History of Three Genres. Language65:487-517.
7.
Biber, Douglas , and Edward Finegan. 1997. Diachronic Relations among Speech-Based and Written Registers in English. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, edited by Terttu Nevalainen and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 253-276. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
8.
Biber , Douglas, Edward Finegan, and Dwight Atkinson. 1994. ARCHER and Its Challenges: Compiling and Exploring “A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers.” In Creating and Using English Language Corpora, edited by Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie, and Peter Schneider, 1-14. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
9.
Cameron , Deborah. 1998. Gender, Language and Discourse: A Review Essay. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society23:945-973.
10.
Coates , Jennifer. 1993. Women, Men and Language: A Sociolinguistic Account of Gender Differences in Language. 2d ed.London: Longman.
11.
Coates , Jennifer. 1996. Women Talk: Conversation between Women Friends. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12.
Crawford , Mary. 1995. Talking Difference: On Gender and Language. London: Sage.
13.
Fleischman , Suzanne. 1998. Gender, the Personal, and the Voice of Scholarship: A Viewpoint. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society23:976-1016.
14.
Freed , Alice, and Alice Greenwood. 1996. Women, Men, and Type of Talk: What Makes the Difference?Language in Society25:1-26.
15.
Holmes , Janet. 1995. Women, Men, and Politeness. London: Longman.
16.
James , Deborah, and Janice Drakich. 1993. Understanding Gender Differences in Amount of Talk: A Critical Review of Research. In Gender and Conversational Interaction, edited by Debrorah Tannen, 281-312. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
17.
Lakoff , Robin. 1990. Talking Power: The Politics of Language in Our Lives. New York: Basic Books.
18.
Nordenstam , Kerstin. 1992. Male and Female Conversational Style. International Journal of the Sociology of Language94:75-98.
19.
Rubin , Donald L., and Kathryn Greene. 1992. Gender-Typical Style in Written Language. Research in the Teaching of English26:7-40.
20.
Tannen , Deborah, ed. 1993. Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21.
Tannen , Deborah, ed. 1994. Gender and Discourse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22.
Tannen , Deborah, and Robin Lakoff. 1994. Conversational Strategy and Metastrategy in Bergman. In Gender and Discourse, edited by Deborah Tannen, 137-173. New York: Oxford University Press. (Reprinted from Semiotica49:323-46, 1984)
