BlakeWilliam, “Annotations to Richard Watson, An apology for the Bible in a series of letters addressed to Thomas Paine” (written 1798), in Blake: Complete writings, ed. by KeynesGeoffrey (London, 1966), 391.
2.
PaineThomas, The age of reason, being an investigation of true and fabulous theology, part first (1794), in Paine: Political writings, ed. by KiblickBruce (Cambridge, 1989), 256.
3.
MacalpineIdaHunterRichard, George III and the mad-business (New York, 1970), 35–36, 41.
4.
For the manufacture of madness and psychiatry, see PorterRoy, Mind forg'd manacles (London, 1990).
5.
FebvreLucien, The problem of unbelief in the sixteenth century, transl. by GottliebBeatrice (Cambridge, Mass., 1982), 441.
6.
BourdieuPierre, “The peculiar history of scientific reason”, Sociological forum, vi (1991), 3–26, p. 9. For histories of the marvellous in relation to natural philosophy “proper” and attempts to exclude wonder from science, see ParkKatherineDastonLorraine, Wonders and the order of nature, 1150–1750 (New York, 1998).
7.
GolinskiJan, Science as public culture: Chemistry and enlightenment in Britain, 1760–1820 (Cambridge, 1992), 3.
8.
EagletonTerry, The function of criticism (London, 1984), 36.
9.
KlancherJon, The making of English reading audiences, 1790–1832 (Madison, 1987), 12. For Joseph Johnson, see ChardL. F., “Joseph Johnson: Father of the book trade”, Bulletin of the New York Public Library, lxxix (1975–76), 51–82. For Newgate prison, see McCalmanIain, “Newgate in revolution: Radical enthusiasm and romantic counterculture”, Eighteenth-century life, xxii (1998), 95–110. For the London Corresponding Society, see ThompsonE. P., The making of the English working class (London, 1980).
10.
The pomp of display is discussed in Klancher, op. cit. (ref. 9), 6; see also RobbinsBruce, “Introduction: The public as phantom”, in The phantom public sphere, ed. by RobbinsBruce (Minneapolis, 1993); cited in GilmartinKevin, “Popular radicalism and the public sphere”, Studies in Romanticism, xxxiii (1994), 549–57, p. 551. For debates about the existence of the public sphere and counter-publics in the 1790s see also, for example, HabermasJurgen, The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, transl. by BurgerThomas (Cambridge, Mass., 1989); CalhounCraig, “Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere”, in Habermas and the public sphere, ed. by CalhounCraig (Cambridge, Mass., 1992), 1–48.
11.
StewartLarry, The rise of public science: Rhetoric, technology, and natural philosophy in Newtonian Britain (Cambridge, 1993); StaffordB. M., Artful science: Enlightenment education and the eclipse of visual education (London, 1994); FaraPatricia, Sympathetic attractions: Magnetic practices, beliefs, and symbolism in eighteenth-century England (Princeton, 1996). See also the many fine papers in “Science lecturing in the eighteenth century”, special issue of The British journal for the history of science, xxviii/1 (1995).
12.
McCalmanIain, “New Jerusalems: Prophecy, dissent and radical culture in England, 1786–1830”, in Enlightenment and religion: Rational dissent in eighteenth-century Britain, ed. by HaakonssenKnud (Cambridge, 1997), 312–35, p. 317.
For the King's confusion, see [WithersPhilip], History of the royal malady, with a variety of entertaining anecdotes (London, 1789), 16; see also PlumbJ. H., England in the eighteenth century (London, 1958), 192. For the patronage showered upon Herschel, see DreyerJ. L. E. (ed.). The collected papers of Sir William Herschel (2 vols, London, 1912), pp. xxxv–lxiii.
15.
W. W. Grenville to the Marquis of Buckingham, 8 November 1788, cited in McCalpineHunter, op. cit. (ref. 3), 29. As Roy Porter has written, madness was often interpreted as a “positive phase of spirituality” in eighteenth-century England, but this was certainly not the case with the monarch. See Porter, Mind forg'd manacles (ref. 4), 268.
16.
For reasons for contentment, see PaleyWilliam, Reasons for contentment; addressed to the labouring part of the British republic (Carlisle, 1792). For the political disputes of the 1790s, see, for example, Thompson, The making of the English working class (ref. 9); ColleyLinda, Britons: Forging the nation, 1707–1837 (London, 1992); and HaakonssenKnud (ed.), Enlightenment and religion: Rational dissent in eighteenth-century Britain (Cambridge, 1997).
17.
JamesLordMonboddoBurnet, Of the origin and progress of language (3 vols, Edinburgh, 1773–92). For the “pestilential breath”, see BenthamJeremy, Fragment on government (1776; Cambridge, 1988), 21. For the necessity of grammar, see TookeJohn Horne, , or, the diversions of Purley (2 vols, London, 1786, 1805). As Tooke griped, “Philosophers have calculated the difference between sound and light: But who will attempt to calculated the difference between speech and thought” (Diversions, i, 27).
18.
HuttonJames, The theory of the Earth with proofs and illustrations (Edinburgh, 1795). For Huttonianism, see DeanDennis, James Hutton and the history of geology (Ithaca, 1992). For responses to Hutton, see PorterRoy, The making of geology: Earth science in Britain, 1660–1815 (Cambridge, 1977), 196–202. For mathematical debates, see PyciorHelena, Symbols, impossible numbers, and geometric entanglements: British algebra through the commentaries on Newton's universal arithmetick (Cambridge, 1997). For chemical debates, see Golinski, Science as public culture (ref. 7). For astronomical concerns, see, for example, GuicciardiniNiccolò, “Stars and gravitation in 18th century Newtonian astronomy”, in Copernico e la questione copernicana in Italia dal XVI al XIX, ed. by PepeLuigi (Florence, 1996), 263–80.
19.
See GenuthSara Schechner, Comets, popular culture, and the birth of modern cosmology (Princeton, N.J., 1997).
20.
For comets and the Gentleman's magazine, see, for example, vol. lxxxiii (1812), 432.
21.
For Caroline Herschel's astronomical work, see HerschelJohnMrs, Memoirs and correspondence of Caroline Herschel (London, 1879); for her comet-sweeping telescopes, see HoskinMichaelWarnerBrian, “Caroline Herschel's comet sweepers”, Journal for the history of astronomy, vii (1981), 27–34.
22.
For George's comment to the archbishop, see “Herschel, William” in the Dictionary of national biography. For Herschel's matter theory and construction of the heavens, see SchafferSimon, ‘“The great laboratories of the universe’: William Herschel on matter theory and planetary life”, Journal for the history of astronomy, xi (1980), 81–111.
23.
For Herschel's telescope, see HerschelWilliam, “Description of a forty-feet reflecting telescope”, Philosophical transactions, lxxxv (1795), 347–409; see also BennettJ. A., ‘“On the power of penetrating into space’: The telescopes of William Herschel”, Journal for the history of astronomy, vii (1976), 75–108. Herschel's comments to the Royal Society concerning extra-terrestrial life in “On the nature and the construction of the Sun and fixed stars”, Philosophical transactions, lxxxv (1795), 46–72; and Herschel to Maskelyne, 12 June 1780, Collected works (ref. 14), i, pp. xc–xci. Herschel's extra-terrestrial speculations and their relation to lunacy, natural history and matter theory are discussed in three papers by SchafferSimon: “Uranus and the establishment of Herschel's astronomy”, Journal for the history of astronomy, xii (1981), 11–26; ‘“The great laboratories of the universe’” (ref. 22); and “Herschel in Bedlam: Natural history and stellar astronomy”, The British journal for the history of science, xiii (1980), 211–39.
24.
Both critiques of Herschel are cited in Schaffer, “Great laboratories”, (ref. 22), 93, 104.
25.
JonesWilliam, The description and use of a new portable orrery (London, 1784), 17–18. HarringtonRobert, A new system on fire and planetary life (London, 1796), iii, 50. Paine, Age of reason (ref. 2), 247–51. For Jones's trade in London, see KingH.MilburnJ., Geared to the stars: The evolution of planetariums, orreries, and astronomical clocks (Toronto, 1978), 205–9.
26.
BrothersRichard, Revealed knowledge of the prophesies and times wrote under the direction of the Lord God (London, 1794).
27.
Brothers, Revealed knowledge (ref. 26), 48.
28.
HarrisonJ. F. C., The second coming: Popular millenarianism, 1780–1850 (New Brunswick, 1979), 3. For Burke's mob, see, for example, BurkeEdmund, “Letter to a member of the National Assembly (1791)”, in The philosophy of Edmund Burke, ed. by BredvoldL.RossR. (Ann Arbor, 1960), 246–55, p. 254.
29.
HalhedNathaniel Brassey, A calculation on the commencement of the Millenium … pointing out those parts of Mr. Brothers' prophecies that have already been fulfilled (London, 1795), 5. For the concord between Brothers and enlightened philosophers, see also, for example, SpencerHenry, A vindication of the prophecies of Mr. Brothers, and the Scripture expositions of Mr. Halhed (London, 1795), 31; BichenoJames, Explanation of scripture prophecy: The signs of the times (Wet Springfield, 1796), 8–11; and Anon., The illuminator, or looking-glass of the times (London, 1797).
30.
Nicholson's journal of natural philosophy, chemistry and the arts, iv (1803), 6. For Davy's recollection, see The collected works or Sir Humphry Davy, ed. by DavyJohn (9 vols, London, 1839–40), ix, 367. For Woulfe's life and work, see BrandeWilliam Thomas, A manual of chemistry (2 vols, London, 1830), i, pp. xix–xx.
31.
van ButchellMartin, Causes of crim. con. also barrenness – and the King's evil: Advice – new – guinea; come from ten till one: For I go to none. The anatomist & sympathizer, who never poisons, – nor sheds humane blood (London, 1795), 16–17.
[OultonWalley Chamberlain], Sound argument dictated by common sense; in answer to Nathaniel Brassey Halhed's testimony (3rd edn, Oxford, 1795).
34.
[WilliamsThomas], The age of credulity: A letter to Nathanial Brassey Halhed …in vindication of the Scripture prophecies (London, 1795). Williams was the publisher of Paine's Age of reason.
35.
LeviDavid, Letters to Nathaniel Brassey Halhed, MP (London, 1795), 47; cited in McCalman, “New Jerusalems” (ref. 12), 323.
Anon., An enquiry into the pretensions of Richard Brothers, in answer to Nathanial Brassey Halhed. By a Freethinker (London, 1795); “Country-Curate”, Strictures on the prophecies of Richard Brothers, and the publications and parliamentary conduct of Nathanial Brassey Halhed (Oxford, 1795).
38.
“Old Woman”, A letter to Nathaniel Brassey Halhed, Esq. M.P. (London, 1795).
39.
HuntingtonWilliam, The lying prophet examined, and his false predictions discovered (2nd edn, London, 1802).
40.
For Brothers's prophecies, see Harrison, The second coming (ref. 28), 57–85; see also BarrellJohn, “Imagining the King's death”, History workshop journal, xxxvii (1994), 1–32.
41.
[SalesWilliam], Truth or not truth; or a discourse on prophets (London, 1795); WhitchurchSamuel, Another witness! Or further testimony in favor of Richard Brothers (London, 1795); Richard “Citizen” Lee, The happy reign of George the last (London, 1795); Bicheno, Signs of the times (ref. 29); OffleyFrancis, Richard Brothers, neither madman nor imposter (London, 1795). Many of Brothers's converts published anonymously: See, for example, Anon., God's awful warnings to a giddy, sinful world (London, 1795); Anon., Glad tidings to Great Britain (Edinburgh, 1795?); CreaseJ., Prophecies fulfilling … addressed to all scoffing sectarians who … despise and reject Richard Brothers (London, 1795); Anon., The world's doom: Or, the cabinet of fate unlocked (London, 1795). Support from women also spewed from the presses: See, for example, GreenSarah, A letter to the publisher of Brothers's prophecies (London, 1795); FlaxmerSarah, Satan revealed; or the dragon overcome. … And also, a testimony that Richard Brothers, is a prophet sent from the Lord (London, 1795); SouthcottJoanna, On the fast day, 1797, the following was given to Joanna Southcott (London, 1797).
42.
PriestleyJoseph, The present state of Europe compared with antient prophesies, a sermon (London, 1794); The conjuror's magazine, or, magical and physiognomical mirror (London, 1791–95); Anon., Every lady's own fortune-teller, or, an infallible guide to the hidden decrees of fate, being a new & regular system for foretelling future events, by astrology, physiognomy, palmistry, moles, cards, and dreams (London, 1793); “Astrologus”, The celestial telegraph, or the almanack of the people, for the year of human redemption 1796 (London, 1795); ColeridgeSamuel Taylor, “Religious musings”, Oxford authors: Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. by JacksonH. J. (Oxford, 1985), 13–23; BlakeWilliam, “Europe: A prophecy”, Blake: Complete writings (ref. 1), 237–44.
43.
Anon., An impartial account of the prophets in the beginning of this century (London, 1795); WillisonJohn, A prophecy of the French Revolution, and the downfall of Antichrist; ForbesWilliam, The Christian soldier in complete armour (Montrose, 1799); Anon., Wonderful prophesies, a dissertation on the prophetic powers in the human mind (4th edn, London, 1795); LoveChristopher, The strange and wonderful predictions of Mr. Christopher Love, … who was beheaded on Tower Hill, in the time of Oliver Cromwell's government of England (Dublin, 1792); FlemingRobert, Apocalyptical key (London, 1701; reprinted London, 1795).
44.
SpratThomas, The history of the Royal Society of London, for the improving of natural knowledge (London, 1667), Section xviii. For Boyle, see, for example, BoyleRobert, A free enquiry into the vulgarly received notion of nature, ed. by DavisE.HunterM. (1686; Cambridge, 1996).
45.
[WolcottJohn], Peter's prophecy; or the president and poet, or, an important epistle to Sir J. Banks (London, 1788), 22, 24, 27. The satire of “maggot-mongers Hall” is in WardNed, “London spy-compleat”, cited in Fara, op. cit. (ref. 11), 159.
46.
HarringtonRobert in Gentleman's magazine, lxvi (1796), 10–12.
47.
“Old Hubert” (i.e. James Parkinson), Account of some peculiar manners and customs of Bull-Land, or the island of contradictions (2nd edn, London, 1795?), 6.
48.
GrayEdward W., “Account of the earthquake felt in various parts of England, Nov. 18, 1795”, Philosophical transactions, lxxxv (1796), 353–81, pp. 355, 361, 367.
49.
For different interpretations of the Royal Society in the eighteenth century, see MillerD. P., “Into the valley of darkness: Reflections on the Royal Society in the eighteenth century”, History of science, xxvii (1989), 155–66, pp. 161–2.
50.
The wonderful magazine, and marvellous chronicle (5 vols, 1794–98), i, 173. WorsdaleJohn, Genethliacal astrology, comprehending an enquiry into, and defence of the celestial science (Newark, 1796). Worsdale's requirement cited in CurryPatrick, “John Worsdale and late 18th century astrology”, History and astrology: Clio and Urania confer, ed. by KitsonAnnabella (London, 1989), 237–42, p. 241.
51.
SiblyEbenezer, A new and complete illustration of the celestial sciences … in four parts (London, 1784–88).
52.
The conjuror's magazine (ref. 42) is discussed in Patrick Curry, “Astrological literature in late 18th century England”, in Kitson (ed.), History and astrology (ref. 50), 243–52.
53.
See, for example, Golinski, Science as public culture (ref. 5), passim; McEvoyJohn, “Causes and laws, powers and principles: The metaphysical foundations of Priestley's concept of phlogiston”, Science, medicine and dissent: Joseph Priestley, ed. by AndersonR. G. W.LawrenceC. (London, 1987), 39–54; SchafferSimon, “Priestley and the politics of spirit”, ibid., 55–72; LawrenceChristopher, “Priestley in Tahiti”, ibid., 1–10.
54.
For Priestley's chemical politicking, see, for example, SchafferSimon, “Priestley's questions: An historiographic survey”, History of science, xxii (1984), 151–83.
55.
HarringtonRobert, op. cit. (ref. 46), 10–12. See also Harrington'sDeath-warrant of the French system of chemistry (London, 1804). John Robison to James Watt, 9 September 1800; reprinted in Partners in science, ed. by RobinsonE.McKieD. (London, 1970), 352.
56.
Joseph Banks to William Herschel, 24 March 1800, in LubbockC., The Herschel chronicle (Cambridge, 1933), 266.
57.
PriestleyJoseph, Letters to the Jews: Inviting them to an amicable discussion on the evidences of Christianity (3rd edn, London, 1794).
58.
SayersJames, “The repeal of the test acts: A vision” (BM Print 7628; London, 1790). For Cruikshanks and Gillray, see, for example, “The friends of the people” (BM Print 8131; London, 1792), “Self murder” (BM Print 7899; London, 1791), “The new morality” (BM Print 9240; London, 1798).
59.
GunningHenry, Reminiscences of Cambridge (2 vols, London, 1854), i, 277.
60.
Priestley, Present state of Europe (ref. 42), 28, 44, 48. For Priestley's millenarianism, see also FruchtmanJ.Jr, The apocalyptic politics of Richard Price and Joseph Priestley: A study in late eighteenth-century English republican millenianism (Philadelphia, 1983).
61.
Colley, Britons (ref. 16), 283–320.
62.
BurkeEdmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790; London, 1970), 173. For a discussion of the phrase “swinish multitude”, see SmithOlivia, The politics of language, 1791–1819 (Oxford, 1984), 79–91.
63.
For unheard voices and porcine authors, see Smith, op. cit. (ref. 62), 80–81. For the protracted struggle over the meanings of red caps, see EpsteinJames, Radical expression: Political language, ritual, and symbol in England, 1790–1850 (New York, 1994).
64.
Priestley's letter to William Pitt cited in KramnickI., “Eighteenth-century science and radical social theory: The case of Joseph Priestley's scientific liberalism”, Journal of British studies, xxv (1986), 1–30, p. 13.
65.
For Priestley's comments, see Experiments and observations on different kinds of air (2nd edn, 3 vols, London, 1775–77), i, Preface. For Priestley's materialism, see YoltonJohn, Thinking matter: Materialism in eighteenth-century Britain (Minneapolis, 1983); see also Schaffer, “Priestley and the politics of spirit” (ref. 53).
66.
For the Unitarian project to re-translate the Bible, see RoeNicholas, Wordsworth and Coleridge: The radical years (Oxford, 1988), 84–110.
67.
For Maseres, see Dictionary of national biography, and WallaceW. Stewart (ed.), The Maseres letters, 1766–1768 (Toronto, 1919), Preface.
68.
For the profane pamphlet, see FrendWilliam, Peace and union recommended to the associated bodies of republicans and anti-republicans (St Ives, 1793). For the proceedings against Frend, see his An account of the proceedings in the University of Cambridge (Cambridge, 1793); see also his A sequel to the account … (London, 1795).
69.
Frend, Account of proceedings (ref. 68), 89–90.
70.
FrendWilliam, The principles of algebra (London, 1796), Preface.
71.
See MaseresFrancis, A dissertation on the use of the negative sign in algebra (London, 1758), 2; Tracts on the resolution of affected algebraick equations (London, 1800); The moderate reformer (London, 1791).
72.
Paine, Age of reason (ref. 2), 223.
73.
FrendWilliam, Address to the inhabitants of Cambridge (Cambridge, 1788), 3–7.
74.
FrendWilliam, “Farther remarks on St. John”, Gentleman's magazine, lxx (1800), 92–96. See also, A letter to the vice-chancellor of the University of Cambridge (Cambridge, 1798), 1–13.
FrendWilliam, What is an album?, Cambridge University Library MS Add.7886.300. Later, imagining himself as a goldfinch — A symbol of Christ — Frend poetically predicted the demise of Newtonianism: See his Memoirs of a goldfinch (London, 1819).
77.
Frend, A letter to the vice-chancellor (ref. 74), 13; see also his Principles of algebra (ref. 70), Preface, and his “Remarks on the number of negative and impossible roots in algebraick equations”, Tracts on the resolution of affected algebraick equations, ed. by MaseresBaron Francis (London, 1800), 473–9.
78.
PigottCharles, A political dictionary, explaining the true meaning of words (London, 1795), 106.
79.
FrendWilliam, The effect of paper money (London, 1801), 9. BurkeEdmund, “Speech on the Nabob of Arcot's debts”, cited in BrantligerPatrick, Fictions of state: Culture and credit in Britain, 1694–1994 (Ithaca, 1996), 107.
80.
WollstonecraftMary, A vindication of the rights of woman (London, 1792; New York, 1994), 12.
81.
For the treason trials, see WharamAlan, The treason trials, 1794 (Leicester, 1992); see also Barrell, “Imagining the King's death” (ref. 40).
82.
Tooke, Diversions of Purley (ref. 17). For the debates about language, see Smith, Politics of language (ref. 62).
83.
BeddoesThomas, Observations on the nature of demonstrative evidence; with an explanation of certain difficulties occuring in the elements of geometry: And reflections on language (London, 1793), 12, 15. For the career of Beddoes, see PorterRoy, Doctor of society: Thomas Beddoes and the sick trade in late enlightenment England (New York, 1992).
84.
BeddoesThomas, A letter to Erasmus Darwin, M.D. on a new method of treating pulmonary consumption (London, 1794), 29n; see also his Notice of some observations made at the Pneumatic Institution (Bristol, 1799), 34–38, cited in Golinski, Science as public culture (ref. 7), 159.
85.
Beddoes, Observations (ref. 83), 151.
86.
SheridanThomas, A dissertation on the causes of the difficulties which occur in learning the English tongue (London, 1761), 36; cited in Smith (ref. 62), 99.
87.
SpenceThomas, The grand repository of the English language (Newcastle, 1775).
88.
SpenceThomas, The important trial of Thomas Spence (London, 1801), 4. For the utopian vision, see Spence, A description of Spensonea (London, 1793); see also The constitution of Spensonea; a country in Fairy Land situated between Utopia and Oceania (London, 1803).
89.
Spence, Important trial (ref. 88), 76, 9.
90.
Spence, Constitution of Spensonea (ref. 88), Epilogue.
91.
Nicolai, “A memoir on the appearance of spectres or phantoms occasioned by disease, with psychological remarks”, Nicholson's journal of natural philosophy, chemistry and the arts, viii (1803), 161–78, p. 165.
92.
ThomsonE. P., The making of the English working class (ref. 9).
93.
BrewerJohn, “The most polite age and the most vicious; Attitudes towards culture as a commodity, 1660–1800”, in The consumption of culture, ed. by BerminghamAnnBrewerJohn (London, 1995), 341–61, p. 348. For studies of low-high scientific entertainment that corroborate Brewer's work, see Stafford, op. cit. (ref. 11); Fara, op. cit. (ref. 11); and SchafferSimon, “The consuming flame: Electrical showmen and Tory mystics in the world of goods”, in Consumption and the world of goods, ed. by BrewerJohnPorterRoy (London, 1993), 489–526.
94.
For example, William Frend chaired several sessions of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, and was a founding member of the Royal Astronomical Society; meanwhile William Herschel's telescope served as the Society's emblem. Samuel Taylor Coleridge was also involved in the initial stages of the BAAS, while James Parkinson was a founding member of the Geological Society.
95.
Wollstonecraft, op. cit. (ref. 80), 23, 149. BenthamJeremy, The theory of fictions, ed. by OgdenC. K. (London, 1932).
96.
Burke, Reflections (ref. 62), passim. For the debates concerning the signs of lunacy, see Porter, Mind forg'd manacles (ref. 4).
97.
For attacks upon Oxbridge, see, for example, GascoigneJohn, Cambridge in the Age of Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1989), passim. For salons, see RoeNicholas, Wordsworth and Coleridge: The radical years (Oxford, 1988), 118–98.