Fit for a King? The George III Gallery at the Science Museum

Quoted in History today, February 1994, 4.

Smollett T. , The expedition of Humphry Clinker (Oxford, 1984), 101–2.

Quoted on p. 30 of Anderson R. , “The museum catalogue: A disappearing art form?”, in Museum publications in science, technology and medicine (Oxford, 1982), 24–31.

The British Museum, Research register 1991–3 (London, 1994); The National Museum of Science and Industry, Review 1993 (London, 1993).

Owen C. , “King interpretation and queen display”, Museum news, May 1994, 2.

Thomas G. , “The age of interaction”, Museums journal, xciv/5 (1994), 33–34.

Durant J. , “Rising to the challenge”, ibid., xciii/10 (1993), 26–27, p. 27.

Cooter R. Pumfrey S. , “Separate spheres and public places: Reflections on the history of science popularization and science in popular culture”, History of science, xxxii (1994), 237–67, espec. pp. 238–9.

Collins H. Shapin S. , “Experiment, science teaching, and the new history and sociology of science”, in Teaching the history of science , ed. by Shortland M. Warwick A. (Oxford, 1989), 67–79.

Quoted in The Times higher educational supplement, 3 June 1994, 19.

Morton Alan Q. Wess Jane A. , Public and private science: The King George III collection (Oxford University Press, Oxford, in association with the Science Museum, 1993); Morton Alan Q. , Science in the 18th century: The King George III Collection (The Science Museum, London, 1993).

The only firm evidence that some seventeenth-century items in the collection belonged to Robert Boyle is a 1770 manuscript.