Essay Review: Hustlers and Patrons of Science,Millikan's School: A History of the California Institute of Technology,Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists 1900–1945
Restricted accessBook reviewFirst published online March, 1993
Essay Review: Hustlers and Patrons of Science,Millikan's School: A History of the California Institute of Technology,Partners in Science: Foundations and Natural Scientists 1900–1945
MillikanRobert A., The autobiography of Robert A. Millikan (London, 1951), 237.
2.
Millikan, Autobiography (ref. 1), 270.
3.
An excellent survey of the novelties of science in the USA is ReingoldN.ReingoldI. H., Science in America: A documentary history 1900–1939 (Chicago and London, 1981).
4.
Penetrating surveys are: HannawayO., “The German model of chemical education in America: Ira Remsen at Johns Hopkins (1876–1913)”, Ambix, xxiii (1976), 145–64; GeigerR. L., To advance knowledge: The growth of American research universities, 1900–1940 (Oxford, 1986); KohlerR. E., “The PhD machine: Building on the collegiate base”, Isis, lxxxi (1990), 638–62.
5.
KargonR. H., “Temple to science: Cooperative research and the birth of the California Institute of Technology”, Historical studies in the physical sciences, viii (1977), 3–31.
6.
KevlesD., “George Ellery Hale, the First World War, and the advancement of science in America”, Isis, lix (1968), 427–37; ReingoldN., “The case of the disappearing laboratory”, American quarterly, xxix (1977), 79–101, reprinted with introductory comment in ReingoldN., Science, American style (New Brunswick and London, 1991), 224–46; ReingoldReingold, Science in America (ref. 3), 193–283.
7.
WrightH., Explorer of the universe: A biography of George Ellery Hale (New York, 1966); eadem, The great Palomar telescope (London, 1953); ReingoldReingold, Science in America (ref. 3), 56–72.
8.
ServosJ. W., “The knowledge corporation: A. A. Noyes and chemistry at Cal-Tech, 1915–1930”, Ambix, xxiii (1976), 175–86.
9.
ServosJ. W., Physical chemistry from Ostwald to Pauling: The making of a science in America (Princeton, 1990), especially pp. 263–98.
10.
PaulingL., “A. A. Noyes”, in Dictionary of scientific biography.
11.
KargonR. H., “The conservative mode: Robert A. Millikan and the twentieth-century revolution in physics”, Isis, lxviii (1977), 509–26; idem, The rise of Robert Millikan: Portrait of a life in American science (Cornell, 1982), especially pp. 92–161.
12.
Millikan, Autobiography (ref. 1), 234–8, 242–71.
13.
AllenG. E., Thomas Hunt Morgan: The man and his science (Princeton, 1978), 334–95.
14.
HallA. R., Science for industry: A short history of the Imperial College of Science and Technology (London, 1982); HarteN., The University of London 1836–1986: An illustrated history (London, 1986).
On Gutenberg see the entry in Dictionary of scientific biography.
22.
HeilbronJ. L.SeidelR. W., Lawrence and his laboratory: A history of the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, i (Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford, 1989).
23.
Millikan, Autobiography (ref. 1), 267–9, 256–7.
24.
ServosJ. W., “The industrial relations of science: Chemical engineering at MIT, 1900–1939”, Isis, lxxi (1980), 531–49.
25.
KohlerR. E., From medical chemistry to biochemistry: The making of a biomedical discipline (Cambridge, 1982).
26.
WilsonL., review of Kohler, From medical chemistry to biochemistry, Journal of the history of medicine, xxxviii (1983), 462–4.
27.
MillerH. S., Dollars for research: Science and its patrons in nineteenth-century America (Seattle, 1970); FosdickR. B., The story of the Rockefeller Foundation (New York, 1952); Fosdick, Adventure in giving: The story of the [Rockefeller] General Education Board (New York, 1962); GrayG. W., Education on an international scale: A history of the [Rockefeller] International Education Board, 1923–1938 (New York, 1941); CornerG. W., A history of the Rockefeller Institute, 1901–1953 (New York, 1964).
28.
ReingoldN., “National science policy in a private foundation: The Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1902–1920”, in OlesonA.VossJ. (eds), The organisation of knowledge in modern America 1860–1920 (Baltimore, 1979), 313–41, reprinted in Reingold, Science, American style (ref. 6), 190–223; ReingoldReingold, Science in America (ref. 3), 7–55.
29.
OlbyR. C., The path to the double helix (London, 1974), especially pp. 441–3; Abir-AmP., “The discourse of physical power and biological knowledge in the 1930s: A reappraisal of the Rockefeller Foundation's ‘policy’ in molecular biology”, Social studies of science, xii (1982), 341–82.
30.
AaserudF., Redirecting science: Neils Bohr, philanthropy, and the rise of nuclear physics (Cambridge, 1990).
31.
KohlerR. E., “The management of science: The experience of Warren Weaver and the Rockefeller Foundation programme in molecular biology”, Minerva, xiv (1976), 279–306.
32.
Kohler, Partners, 4.
33.
Kohler, Partners, 170.
34.
Kohler, Partners, 180; Harte, University of London (ref. 14), 203–11; BeveridgeW. H., Power and influence (London, 1953), 185–204.
Kohler, Partners, 186–7; “Report of the Council of the Senate on a proposed benefaction for the new University Library and for developments in agriculture, biology, and physics”, Cambridge University reporter, lix (1928), 162–6; discussion of this Report, ibid., 235–40.
37.
Kohler, Partners, 6.
38.
Kohler, Partners, 262, 338–41, 348–52. For details of Wrinch's Oxford career see Abir-AmP. G., “Synergy or clash: Disciplinary and marital strategies in the career of mathematical biologist Dorothy Wrinch”, in Abir-AmOutramD. (eds), Uneasy careers and intimate lives: Women in science, 1789–1979 (New Brunswick and London, 1987), 239–80.
39.
Oxford University Gazette, lxii (1931–32), 525–6; lxiii (1932–33), 21–22; lxvi (1935–36), 14, 186; lxvii (1936–37), 26, 234; lxx (1939–40), 53, 58, 252; OrdM. G.StockenL. A., The Oxford biochemistry department: Its history and activities 1920–1985 (Oxford, 1990); KrebsH. A., “Sir Archibald Garrod”, in DewhurstK. (ed.), Oxford medicine: Essays on the evolution of the Oxford clinical school to commemorate the bicentary [sic] of the Radcliffe Infirmary 1770–1970 (Sandford, 1970), 127–35. For Young and Abraham, see Who's who.
40.
Abir-AmP. G., “The discourse of physical power” (ref. 29).
41.
BernalJ. D., The social function of science (London, 1939), 206.