RudwickMartin J. S., The history of the natural sciences as cultural history (Amsterdam, 1975), 16–21.
2.
“Problems in the emergence of new disciplines”, Introduction to Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines, ed. by LemaineGerardMacleodRoyMulkayMichael, and WeingartPeter (The Hague, 1976), 19.
3.
FoucaultMichel, L'archéologie du savoir (Paris, 1969), 177–83.
4.
MedawarPeter, The art of the soluble (Harmondsworth, 1969), 169–70.
5.
RavetzJerome R., Scientific knowledge and its social problems (Harmondsworth, 1973), 75–108.
6.
KrebsHans A. and ShelleyJulian A., eds, The creative process in science and medicine(Amsterdam, 1975), 24.
7.
CollinsHarry M., “The seven sexes: A study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics”, Sociology, ix (1975), 205–24.
8.
AchinsteinPeter, “Inference to scientific laws”, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. v: Historical and philosophical perspectives of science, ed. by StuewerRoger H. (Minneapolis, 1970), 98–102.
9.
GruberHoward E., Darwin on man (New York, 1974), 114.
10.
ibid., 114.
11.
Krebs and Shelley, Creative process (ref. 6).
12.
Gruber, Darwin (ref. 9), xiii–xiv.
13.
HoltonGerald, The scientific imagination: Case studies (Cambridge, 1978), viii.
14.
Achinstein, “Inference” (ref. 8), 87.
15.
FrankRobert G.Jr, Harvey and the Oxford physiologists (Berkeley, 1980).
16.
TuchmanBarbara W., “Biography as a prism of history”, Telling lives: The biographer's art, ed. by PachterMarc (Washington, D.C., 1979), 134.
