Coleridge and Natural Philosophy: A Review of Recent Literary and Historical Research

McGuire J. E. , “Newton and the demonic furies: Some current problems and approaches in history of science”, History of science, xi (1973), 21–48; Smith Roger , “The background of physiological psychology in natural philosophy”, History of science, xi (1973), 75–123.

See Jacob M. C. , “John Toland and the Newtonian ideology”, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, lx (1969), 307–31.

See, for example, Heimann P. M. , “Faraday's theories of matter and electricity”, British journal of the history of science, v (1971), 235–57.

Williams L. Pearce , Michael Faraday (London, 1965), 62.

Levere Trevor , Affinity and matter (Oxford, 1971), 30.

Ibid., p. 135, n. 176.

See McGuire J. E. Rattansi P. M. , “Newton and the ‘Pipes of Pan’”, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, xxi (1966), 108–43, and Rattansi P. M. , “Newton's alchemical studies”, in Science, medicine and society in the Renaissance (ed. Debus A. G. , New York and London, 1972), 167–82.

Needham Joseph , “Coleridge as a philosophical biologist”, Science progress, xx (1926), 692–702.

Schrickx W. , “Coleridge's marginalia in Kant's Anfangsgrunde”, Studia Germanica Gandensia, i (1959), 9–16.

Journal of the history of ideas, xxxi (1970), 199–218.

Studies in history and philosophy of science, iii (1973), 301–56.

Historical studies in the physical sciences, forthcoming.

McGuire J. E. Heimann P. M. , “Newtonian forces and Lockean powers: Concepts of matter in eighteenth century thought”, Historical studies in the physical sciences, iii (1971), 233–306; Knight D. M. , “The physical sciences and the Romantic movement”, History of science, ix (1970), 54–75.

Comparative literature studies, vii (1970), 297–313.

Shaffer E. S. , “Coleridge's theory of aesthetic interest”, Journal of aesthetics and art criticism, xxvii (1969), 399–408.

Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, cxvi (1972), 458–76.