The story of how the microscopes from the King George III Collection became assimilated into the Crisp Collection late last century is told in Whipple [2].
2.
While preparing my papers on James Short (Turner [15], [16]) I traced, with the help of others, the present whereabouts of 106 reflecting telescopes made by Short. These are to be found all over the world. The list of these instruments has not yet been published.
3.
A catalogue of the Crisp sale in the Museum of the History of Science, Oxford, has been annotated by Lionel S. Day, who states that the catalogue descriptions were written by Court. For further details of the sale see Heywood. See also, note 1 above.
4.
For a list of von Rohr's books, papers, lectures, etc., numbering 568 items, see Jahn–JubeltK., “Zusammenstellung der von Moritz v. Rohr veröffentlichten Arbeiten”, Forschungen zur Geschichte der Optik, iii, pt. 3 (Aug. 1943), 115–133. This list is an invaluable bibliography of the history of optics.
5.
Exhibition of the works of industry of all nations 1851. Reports by the juries on the subjects in the thirty classes into which the Exhibition was divided (London, 1852), 521–530. The Society for Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce offered a gold medal in 1822, and still in 1845, for “flint glass free from veins, as dense and transparent as the best now in use, and quite fit for the purpose of opticians”; Abstract of proceedings and transactions session 1822–23, and 1845–46.
6.
HoltzapffelCharles, Turning and mechanical manipulation, iii, “Abrasive and miscellaneous processes, which cannot be accomplished with cutting tools” (London, 1864).
7.
See also HartingP., Das Mikroskop. Theorie, Gebrauch, Geschichte und gegenwartiger Zustand desselben, Transl. TheileW. (Brunswick, 1859), 572 ff.
8.
Nobert produced in 1851 an extremely simple proof of the wave theory by means of a glass plate with a series of diffraction gratings ruled on it; see Turner [11].
9.
In the title of B. Martin, An essay on visual glasses, (vulgarly called spectacles). Wherein it is shown from the principles of optics, and the nature of the eye, that the common structure of those glasses is contrary to the rules of art, to the nature of things, & c. and very prejudicial to the eyes; the nature of vision in the eye explained, and glasses of a new construction proposed (London, 1758).
10.
For an account of how science developed in Japan under the influence of both Chinese and Western science, and its relationship to economic and political conditions, see TugeHideomi, Historical development of science and technology in Japan (Series on Japanese life and culture, vol. V) (Tokyo, 1961). Three microscopes used in Japan are illustrated in figure 49.
11.
MayallJ.Jun., Cantor lectures on the microscope (London, 1886), also published in Journal of the Society of Arts (1886).
12.
ListerJ. J., “On some properties in achromatic object-glasses applicable to the improvement of the microscope”. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, cxx (1830) 187–200. For the background to the discovery see ListerJoseph, “Obituary Notice of the late Joseph Jackson Lister, F.R.S., Z.S., with special reference to his Labours in the Improvement of the Achromatic Microscope”, Monthly microscopical journal, iii (1870) 134–143. I have in preparation a paper on J. J. Lister's contribution to microscopy.
13.
NelsonEdward Milles (1851–1938) was, perhaps, the last of the great amateur microscopists. He published well over 300 papers in the Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society and in the Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club between 1881 and 1923. Many notes by him are in the English mechanic, and a few papers are to be found elsewhere. In this bibliography I have included only one paper by Nelson, which is in a lesser known journal. Articles on historic instruments and on the development of the microscope that appeared in the Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society from 1878 to 1926 are listed in Disney, pp. 291–294, and this includes, of course, Nelson's contributions.
14.
Terminology will be found to be inexact: a photomicrograph is a photograph of an object as enlarged under the microscope, but microphotograph is also used with this meaning. It would be better if the latter word were restricted to mean a very small photograph that is to be viewed under a microscope. Microphotographs were very popular during Victorian times, and J. B. Dancer produced a great many series of them; see Ardern, Dancer, Stirling.
15.
The interesting Dollond microscope described in this paper is to be dated c. 1840, not 1750.
16.
The contribution of German microscopists is, in spite of the title, the subject of FreundHugoBergAlexander, Geschichte der Mikroskopie. Leben und Werk grosser Forscher. Band i: Biologie (Frankfurt am Main, 1963). The authors have been accused of chauvinism by the reviewer in Archives d'histoire des sciences, xviii, nos. 70/71 (Jan.–June 1965) 140 f.
17.
Harriot's observation of the moon on 26 July, 1609, with a telescope of magnification × 6, is probably the earliest recorded astronomical use of the telescope (Leconsfield MS 241, ix).
18.
No. O. 71; previously in the Gabb Collection, no. B.57. This is not the place to consider this telescope in detail, but, briefly, it was attributed by Gabb to A. M. Schyrle de Rheita (1597–1660) on the basis of a small impressed monogram “MR” (= Maria Rheita!) with an eight-pointed star above the initials. Some ink figures on a draw-tube were read as “Ao. 1645–6”. I have carefully examined these figures and it is not clear that they represent a date at all. Exactly the same monogram and star appear on a similar, though smaller, telescope in the King George III Collection (Chaldecott [1], p. 48, no. 169), Science Museum, London, no. 1927–1171. Both of these telescopes are typical of the first half of the eighteenth century, and are possibly Italian.
19.
No. O. 72; previously in the Gabb Collection, no. B.1. The telescope was exhibited by Gabb at the Optical Convention 1926 (catalogue [7], p. 297, no. H. 172). At the time it was said to have a positive objective and a negative ocular, the magnification being × 3. Court & von Rohr [2], p. 212, state that John Mayall once owned this telescope, when its focal length was 40 inches. They continue: “When it was sold by auction on the nth June, 1909, lenses were unfortunately missing and only the tube was left.” The present focal length is 72.5 cm., about 28 inches (private communication 12 Nov. 1965 from Lt.-Cdr. H. D. Howse, R. N.). It is possible, therefore, that the lenses are a modern replacement. The gold-tooled decoration on this telescope resembles French work; the focusing marks are labelled “Nahe, Weith, Oversichtig”.
20.
D, “Curious extracts from old English books, with remarks which prove that the telescope, &c. were known in England much earlier than in any other country”, Philosophical magazine, xviii (1804) 245–256, xix (1804) 66–79. That J. E. Drinkwater was the pseudonymous author is stated by the editor in a footnote to DrinkwaterJ. E., ‘Observations respecting the invention of the telescope’, Philosophical magazine, 3rd series, i (1832) 9–16.
21.
Ahlström [1]. AhlströmOtto, Synvertyg från äldre tider. Katalog om fattemde synverktyg från tiden 1600-talets slut till 1900-talets början samt korta uppsatser om optikerhantverkets historia (Stockholm, 1943).
22.
Ahlström [2]. AhlströmOtto, Glasögen i Nordiska Museet jämte en översikt av glasögentypernas utveckling (Stockholm, 1947).
23.
Ahlström [3]. AhlströmOtto, “Chinese spectacles”, The optician, cxix, no. 3076 (17 March 1950) 201–208.
24.
Ahlström [4]. AhlströmOtto, “Swedish Vikings used optical lenses”, idem, cxix, no. 3085 (19 May 1950) 459–462, 464, 469.
25.
Ahlström [5]. AhlströmOtto, “The development of the optical profession in Sweden”, idem, cxix, no. 3087 (2 June 1950) 517–520.
26.
Aldis. AldisH. L., “On the construction of photographic objectives”, The photographic journal, xxiv, no. 10 (June 1900) 291–299.
27.
Allen. AllenPhyllis, “Problems connected with the development of the telescope (1609–1687)”, Isis, xxxiv (1943) 302–311.
28.
Allodi [1]. AllodiFederico, Studi e ricerche sui microscopi Galileiani del Museo di storia della scienza, fascicolo I (Istituto e Museo di Storia della Scienza, Biblioteca II) (Florence, 1962).
29.
Allodi [2]. AllodiFederico, I microscopi Culpeper di Norimberga (Florence, 1962).
30.
American Optical Co. Three American microscope builders (Buffalo, N. Y.: American Optical Co., 1945).
31.
Andrew. AndrewLlewelyn, “Some notes on the history of spectacles”, Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, xlii (1927), 24 pp.
32.
Angus-Butterworth. Angus-ButterworthL. M., “Glass”, in A history of technology, ed. SingerC., iv, “The Industrial Revolution c. 1750 to c. 1850” (Oxford, 1958), 358–378.
33.
Anon [1]. “Dr Robert Koch on the Abbe Illuminator”, Watson's microscope record, no. 20 (May 1930) 16–18.
34.
Anon [2]. “Ernst Abbe (1840–1905). The origin of a great optical industry”, Nature, cxlv (20 Jan. 1940) 89–91.
35.
Ardern. ArdernL. L., John Benjamin Dancer—originator of microphotography, (Library Association (N. W. Group) occasional paper no. 2) (London, 1960).
36.
Arrighi. ArrighiGino, “Lettere di G. B. Amici nelle Biblioteche di Fortí e di Lugo (30 inediti)”, Physis. Rivista internazionale di storia della scienza, vii (1965) 48–69.
37.
Auerbach [1]. AuerbachFelix, Ernst Abbe. Sein Leben, sein Wirken, seine Persönlichkeit (Leipzig, 1918).
38.
Auerbach [2]. AuerbachFelix, Das Zeisswerk und die Carl Zeiss-Stiftung in Jena, 5th edn. (Jena, 1925).
39.
Badcock. BadcockA. W., “Physical optics at the Royal Society 1660–1800”, British journal for the history of science, i, no. 2 (December 1962) 99–116.
40.
Baker [1]. BakerJohn R., “The discovery of the uses of colouring agents in biological micro-techniques”, Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, 4th series, i, no. 6 (Dec, 1943) 256–275. Revised as Monographs of the Quekett Microscopical Club No 1 (London, 1945).
41.
Baker [2]. BakerJohn R., “Experiments on the function of the eye in light microscopy”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxxxv, pt 3 (June 1966) 231–254.
42.
Bancher & Hölzl [1]. BancherE.HölzlJ., “Simon Plössl, ‘Nestor der deutschen Mikroskopverfertiger’”, Universum—Natur und Technik, xv, no. 23 (1960) 725–729.
43.
Bancher & Hölzl [2]. BancherE.HölzlJ., “Die Anfänge der deutschen Mikroskoperzeugung”, Universum—Natur und Technik, xvi, no. 9 (1961) 268–274.
44.
Barron. BarronA. L. E., “Concerning John Thomas Quekett and some of his contemporaries”, Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, xxix, no. 1 (Feb. 1962) 3–8.
45.
Baxandall [1]. BaxandallDavid, “Early telescopes in the Science Museum, from an historical standpoint”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxiv, no. 5 (1922–23) 304–320.
46.
Baxandall [2]. BaxandallDavid, “Replicas of two Galileo telescopes”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxv, no. 3 (1923–24) 141–144.
47.
Baxandall & Court [1]. BaxandallDavidCourtThomas H., “Early optical and other scientific instruments as documents of historical value”. Proceedings of the Optical Convention 1926, pt II (London [1926]) 537–540.
48.
Baxandall & Court [2]. BaxandallDavidCourtThomas H., “A telescope made by Christopher Cock in 1673”, Proceeding of the Optical Convention 1926, pt II, (London [1926]) 529–536.
49.
BeckBeckH. H. C., “Early magnifying glasses”, The Antiquaries journal, viii (1928) 327–330.
50.
Beck, BeckW. William, Family fragments respecting the ancestry, acquaintance and marriage of Richard Low Beck and Rachel Lucas (Gloucester, 1897).
51.
Bedini [1]. BediniSilvio A., “The optical workshop equipment of Giuseppe Campani”, Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences, xvi, no. 1 (1961) 18–38.
52.
Bedini [2]. BediniSilvio A., “On making telescope tubes in the 17th century (an anonymous Italian manuscript)”, Physis. Revista di storia della scienza, iv (1962) 110–116.
53.
Bedini [3]. BediniSilvio A., “Seventeenth century Italian compound microscopes”, idem, v (1964) 383–422.
54.
Bedini [4]. BediniSilvio A., “Giuseppe Campani, pioneer optical inventor”, Ithaca—26 VIII—2 IX1962 (Proceedings of the tenth international congress of history of science) i (Paris, 1964), 401–404.
55.
Bedini [5]. BediniSilvio A., “The makers of Galileo's scientific instruments”, Atti del Simposio su “Galileo nella storia e nella filosofia della scienza” (Florence–Pisa, 14–16 Sept. 1964) (Florence) 89–115.
56.
Bedini [6]. BediniSilvio A., “Lens making for scientific instrumentation in the seventeenth century”, Applied optics, v, no. 5 (May 1966) 687–694.
57.
Bedini [7]. BediniSilvio A., “An early optical lens-grinding lathe”, Technology and culture, viii, no. 1 (Winter 1967) 74–77.
58.
Bedini [8]. BediniSilvio A., “The aerial telescope”, idem, viii, no. 3 (July 1967) 395–401.
59.
Belloni [1]. BelloniLuigi, “Micrografia illusoria e ‘animalcula’”, Physis. Rivista di storia della scienza, iv (1962) 65–73.
60.
Belloni [2]. BelloniLuigi, “I trattati di M. Malpighi sulla struttura della lingua e della cute (‘De lingua’—‘De externo tactus organo’)”, idem, vii (1965) 431–475.
61.
Belloni [3]. BelloniLuigi, “La neuroanatomia di Marcello Malpighi”, idem, viii (1966) 253–266.
62.
Bernard. BernardJean-Georges, Histoire des microscopes ce que leur doit la médecine (Paris, 1886).
63.
Best [1]. BestA. E., “Lister's microscopic research on chromatophores”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 4 (Sept. 1967) 407–427.
64.
Best [2]. BestA. E., “The discovery of the mechanism of colour-changes in the chameleon”Annals of science, xxiv, no. 2 (June 1968) 147–167.
65.
Bibliography [1]. Bulletin signalétique, “Section 522: Histoire des sciences et des techniques”, ed. BeaulieuM. A., Paris: Centre de documentation du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Volume i published in 1947.
66.
Bibliography [2]. “Critical bibliography of the history of science and its cultural influences”, Isis. An international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences. The forthcoming Isis Cumulative Bibliography, edited by WhitrowMagda, is formed from bibliographies 1–90 (1913–1965).
67.
Bibliography [3]. Current work in the history of medicine. An international bibliography, London: Wellcome Institute of the History of Medicine. Number 1 published in 1954.
68.
Bibliography [4]. Bibliography of books and papers published in [year] on the history of astronomy, Moscow: Commission 41 (history of astronomy) of the International Astronomical Union. The first bibliography, for 1960, was published in 1961.
69.
Boegehold [1]. BoegeholdH., “Some remarks on old English objectives”. Transactions of the Optical Society, xxx (1928–29) 41–43.
70.
Boegehold [2]. BoegeholdH., “Der Glas-Wasser Versuch von Newton und Dollond”, Forschungen zur Geschichte der Optik, i, pt. 1 (Dec. 1928) 7–40.
71.
Boegehold [3]. BoegeholdH., “Zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte der achromatischen Fernrohrobjektive”, idem, iii, pt. 3 (Aug. 1943) 81–114.
72.
Bonelli. BonelliMaria Luisa, Cimeli Galileiani (Istituto e Mueso di Storia della Scienza, Biblioteca V) (Florence, 1962).
73.
Boroviczény. von BoroviczényK. G., “125 Jahre Mikrophotographie”, Deutsches Ärzteblatt—Ärztliche Mitteilungen, lxiii, no. 5 (Jan. 1966) 285–289.
74.
Bradbury [1]. BradburyS., “The quality of the image produced by the compound microscope: 1700–1840”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 1 (Jan. 1967) 151–173. Also published in Historical aspects of microscopy, ed. BradburyS.TurnerG. L'E. (Cambridge, 1967) 151–173.
75.
Bradbury [2]. BradburyS., The evolution of the microscope (Oxford, 1967).
76.
Bradbury [3]. BradburyS., “The development of the reflecting microscope”, Microscopy: Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, xxxi (1968) 1–19.
77.
Bradbury [4]. BradburyS., “The development of the microscope during the last fifty years”, Journal of scientific instruments (Journal of physics E) 2nd series, i (1968) 3–7.
78.
Bradbury & Turner [1]. BradburyS.TurnerG. L'E., “An electron microscopical examination of Nobert's ten-band test-plate”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxxxiv, pt. 1 (April 1965) 65–75.
79.
Bradbury & Turner [2]. BradburyS.TurnerG. L'E.Historical aspects of microscopy. Papers read at a one-day conference held by the Royal Microscopical Society at Oxford, 18 March, 1966 (Cambridge, 1967).
80.
British Dental Journal. British dental journal, cxxi, no. 2 (19 July 1966) “Microscope number” 47–106.
81.
Bryden. BrydenD. J., James Short and his telescopes. [Exhibition at the] Royal Scottish Museum, Edinburgh, July 26th-September 7th, 1968 (Edinburgh, 1968).
82.
Buffa. BuffaPaolo, “Note alla memoria ‘Sulla fibra muscolare’ di Giovan Battista Amici”, in From molecule to cell: Symposium on electron microscopy, ed. BuffaPaolo (Rome1964).
83.
Calvert. CalvertH. R., “Scientific trade cards as source material in the history of science”. Actes de XIIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sciences, Paris 25–31 août 1968 (Paris, forthcoming).
84.
Castaldi. CastaldiL., I microscopi costruite da Galileo, con notizie sugli inizi del telescopio (Florence: Società italiana di Storia della Scienze mediche e naturali, 1942).
85.
Catalogue [1]. The Billings Microscope Collection of the Medical Museum Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (Washington, D.C.: The American Registry of Pathology, 1967).
86.
Catalogue [2]. SutcliffeJohn. H., compiler and editor, assisted by Margaret Mitchell & Edith Chittell, British Optical Association Library and Museum catalogue (London, 1932); Anon., British Optical Association Library catalogue, vol. ii (London, 1935); MitchellMargaret, complier & editor, British Optical Association Library catalogue, vol. iii (London, 1957).
87.
Catalogue [3]. Catalogue of a loan exhibition of historic scientific apparatus in Cambridge, 8–23 June 1936 (Cambridge, [1936]).
88.
Catalogue [4]. A catalogue of the collection of antique microscopes, formed by the late Sir Frank Crisp, Bart…. sold at Steven's Auction Rooms Ltd., February 17th 1925 [London, 1925].
89.
Catalogue [5]. [BonelliMaria Luisa, ed.,] Catalogo degli strumenti del Museo di storia della scienza (Florence, 1954).
90.
Catalogue [6]. Collection Nachet. Instruments scientifiques et livres anciens. Notice sur l'invention du microscope et son évolution par Albert Nachet. Liste de savants, constructeurs & amateurs du XVIe au milieu du XIXe siècle (Paris, 1929).
91.
Catalogue [7]. The Optical Convention 1926. Catalogue of optical and general scientific instruments (London, 1926).
92.
Catalogue [8]. Catalogue of a loan exhibition of early scientific instruments in Oxford, 16 May, 1919 (Oxford, 1919).
93.
Catalogue [9]. [TaylorF. Sherwood,] Catalogue of an exhibition of scientific apparatus pertaining to medicine and surgery (Oxford: Museum of the History of Science, 1947).
94.
Catalogue [10]. Catalogue of the books in the library of the Quekett Microscopical Club, new and revised edition (London, 1915). A revised catalogue is being published in parts as supplements to the Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club; the first part appeared with xxix no. 10 (May 1964).
95.
Catalogue [11]. Catalogue of the printed books and pamphlets in the library of the Royal Microscopical Society (London, 1929). [Although much of the library has been dispersed, making this no longer a catalogue useful for locating a work, it does provide a useful bibliography, particularly for research into the development of microscopy. See also for journals, their changes of names, etc.]
96.
Catalogue [12]. Lister centenary exhibition at the Wellcome Historical Medical Museum. Handbook, 1927 (London, 1927).
97.
Catalogue [13]. A catalogue of printed books in the Wellcome Historical Medical Library, i, “Books printed before 1641” (London, 1962), ii “Books printed between 1641 and 1850; A–E” (London, 1966).
98.
Catalogue [14]. [HallA. R.] A guide to the historic scientific instruments in the Whipple Museum of the History of Science (Cambridge, 1949).
99.
Catalogue [15]. The Kodak Museum. A permanent exhibition illustrating the history of photography and some of its applications in science art and industry (Harrow, 1947).
100.
Ceram. CeramC. W., Archaeology of the cinema (London, 1965).
101.
Chaldecott [1]. ChaldecottJ. A., Handbook of the King George III collection of scientific instruments. Catalogue of exhibits [in the Science Museum, London] with descriptive notes (London, 1951).
102.
Chaldecott [2]. ChaldecottJ. A., “The zograscope or optical diagonal machine”, Annals of science, ix, no. 4 (Dec. 1953) 315–322.
103.
Champness. ChampnessWilliam, The Worshipful Company of Spectacle Makers. A brief historical note (London, n.d.)
104.
Chance & Hampton. ChanceW. H. S.HamptonW. M., “Some recent developments in the art of production of glass for optical purposes”, Proceedings of the Optical Convention 1926, pt. I (London [1926]) 24–40.
105.
Chenakal [1]. ChenakalV. L., “The astronomical observatory of St Petersburg Academy of Sciences at the end of the eighteenth century”, Istoriko-astronomicheskie issledovaniya, ii (1956) 141–152.
106.
Chenakal [2]. ChenakalV. L., “Small observatories of St Petersburg Academy of Sciences in the eighteenth century”, idem, iii (1957) 261–428.
107.
Chenakal [3]. ChenakalV. L., “W. Herschel's mirror telescope in Russia”, idem, iv (1958) 253–339.
108.
Chenakal [4]. ChenakalV. L., “James Short and Russian astronomy”, idem, v (1959) 11–82.
109.
Chenakal [5]. ChenakalV. L., “The astronomical instruments of J. Bird in Russia in the eighteenth century”, idem, vi (1960) 54–120.
110.
Chenakal [6]. ChenakalV. L., “New data on the system of numeration of telescopes by Short”, idem, ix (1966) 287–290. [The above six papers are in Russian.]
111.
Chenakal [7]. ChenakalV. L., “The astronomical instruments of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in the museums of the U.S.S.R.”, Vistas in astronomy, ix (1968) 53–77.
112.
Cheshire. CheshireF. J., “Polariscopes: A few typical forms of early instruments in the South Kensington Museum”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxiii, no. 4 (1921–22) 246–255.
113.
Clarke & Bearn. ClarkeEdwinBearnJ. G., “The brain ‘glands’ of Malpighi elucidated”, Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences, xxiii, no. 4 (Oct. 1968) 309–330.
114.
Clay [1]. ClayR. S., “A brief account of some of the historical instruments exhibited at the Optical Convention, 1926”, Proceedings of the Optical Convention, 1926, pt. II (London [1926]) 493–501.
115.
Clay [2]. ClayR. S., “Presidential Address: The stereoscope”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxix, no. 4 (1927–28) 149–166.
116.
Clay [3]. ClayR. S., “Presidential Address: A review of the mechanical improvements of microscopes in the last forty years”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lviii (1938) 1–29.
117.
Clay & Court [1]. ClayReginald S.CourtThomas H., “Two microscopes made by G. Adams for King George III”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, xlvi (1926) 268–273.
118.
Clay & Court [2]. ClayReginald S.CourtThomas H., The history of the microscope compiled from original instruments and documents, up to the introduction of the achromatic microscope (London, 1932).
119.
Cohen. CohenI. B., Some early tools of American science (Cambridge, Mass., 1950).
120.
Colloque. Comptes rendus du Congrès des Sociétés savantes de Paris et des Départements. Tenu a Chambéry-Annecy en 1960. Section des sciences, [part II] “Histoire des sciences: Colloque sur la microscopie et la micrographie aux XVIIIe et XIXe siècles” (Paris, 1961) 531–640.
121.
Cook. CookOlive, Movement in two dimensions (London, 1963).
122.
CookeTroughtonSimms. A decade of progress in the design and manufacture of scientific optical instruments and apparatus (Cooke, Troughton & Simms, Ltd., Publication No. 587) (York [1926]).
123.
Corrington. CorringtonJulian D., “The microscope. A pictorial history”, Nature magazine, xxxii, no. 2 (February 1939) 79–84, 93–96.
124.
Corson. CorsonRichard, Fashions in eyeglasses (London, 1967).
125.
Court & von Rohr [1]. CourtThomas H.von RohrMoritz, “On the development of spectacles in London from the end of the seventeenth century (first paper on the Court Collection)”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxx (1928–29) 1–21.
126.
Court & von Rohr [2]. CourtThomas H.von RohrMoritz, “A history of the development of the telescope from about 1675 to 1830 based on documents in the Court Collection (third paper on the Court Collection)”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxx (1928–29) 207–260.
127.
Court & von Rohr [3]. CourtThomas H.von RohrMoritz, “Contributions to the history of the Worshipful Company of Spectaclemakers (second paper on the Court Collection)”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxxi (1929–30) 53–90.
128.
Court & von Rohr [4]. CourtThomas H.von RohrMoritz, “New knowledge of old telescopes (A supplement to the third paper on the Court Collection)”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxxii (1930–31) 113–122.
129.
Cowles [1]. CowlesThomas, “Dr Henry Power, disciple of Sir Thomas Browne”, Isis, xx (1933) 344–366.
130.
Cowles [2]. CowlesThomas, “Dr Henry Power's poem on the microscope”, idem, xxi (1934) 71–80.
131.
Crombie [1]. CrombieA. C., Robert Grosseteste and the origins of experimental science 1100–1700 (Oxford1953).
132.
Crombie [2]. CrombieA. C., “The mechanistic hypothesis and the scientific study of vision: Some optical ideas as a background to the invention of the microscope”. Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 1 (Jan. 1967) 3–112. Also published in Historical aspects of microscopy, ed. BradburyS.TurnerG. L'E. (Cambridge, 1967) 3–112.
133.
Crommelin [1]. CrommelinC. A., Beschrijvende catalogus der historische verzameling van natuurkundige instrumenten in het Natuurkundig Laboratorium der Rijks-Universiteit te Leiden (Leiden, 1926).
134.
Crommelin [2]. CrommelinC. A., Het lenzen slijpen in de 17e eeuw (Amsterdam, 1929).
135.
Crommelin [3]. CrommelinC. A., “La loupe, son origine et son développement”, Journal suisse d'horlogerie (July 1949) 85–98.
136.
Crommelin [4]. CrommelinC. A., Descriptive catalogue of the Huygens collection in the Rijksmuseum voor die Geschiedenis der Natuurwetenschappen at Leiden (Leiden, 1949).
137.
Dancer. [DancerJ. B.,] “John Benjamin Dancer F.R.A.S. 1812–1887. An autobiographical sketch, with some letters” (foreword by W. Browning), Memoirs and proceedings of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, cvii (1964–65) 115–142.
138.
Daumas. DaumasMaurice, Les instruments scientifiques aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (Paris, 1953).
139.
Day. DayW., “The birth of kinematography, and its antecedents”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxiv, no. 2 (1922–23) 69–71.
140.
Deby. DebyJulien, Bibliotheca Debyana being a catalogue of books and abstracts relating to natural science, with special reference to microscopy, in the library of Julien Deby, M.E., F.R.M.S., Etc., i, “I, Serial and Periodical Publications; II, The Microscope and its Technicalities; III, The Protoza”, (London, 1889).
141.
Demoriane. DemorianeHélène, “Les instruments scientifiques du temps passé”, Connaissance des arts, no. 153 (Nov. 1964) 124–131; no. 167 (Jan. 1966) 82–89.
142.
De Waard. de WaardC.Jr., De uitvinding der verrekijkers. Eene bijdrage tot de beschavingsgeschiedenis (The Hague, 1906).
143.
Disney. DisneyAlfred N., ed., with collaboration of Cyril F. Hill & Wilfred E. Watson, Origin and development of the microscope, as illustrated by catalogues of the instruments and accessories, in the collections of the Royal Microscopical Society, together with bibliographies of original authorities …. Preceded by an historical survey on the early progress of optical science by the editor (London, 1928).
144.
Ditisheim. DitisheimPaul, “Pierre-Louis Guinand et les verres d'optique”, Bulletin de la Société astronomique de France (April 1925), 23 pp.
145.
Dobell. DobellClifford, Anthony van Leeuwenhoek and his “Little animals” being some account of the father of protozoology and bacteriology and his multifarious discoveries in these disciplines collected, translated, and edited from his printed works, unpublished manuscripts, and contemporary records (London, 1932; reprinted New York, 1960).
146.
Doesschate. ten DoesschateG., “Oxford and the revival of optics in the thirteenth century”. Vision research, i, nos. 5–6 (1962) 313–342.
147.
Drake. DrakeStillman, “Galileo gleanings—XIII. An unpublished fragment relating to the telescope and the Medicean stars”, Physis. Rivista di storia della scienza, iv (1962) 342–344.
148.
Dreyer. DreyerJ. L. E., ed., Scientific papers of W. Herschel, 2 vols., (London, 1912).
149.
Egerton. EgertonFrank N., “Leeuwenhoek as a founder of animal demography”, Journal of the history of biology, i, no. 1 (Spring 1968) 1–22.
150.
'Espinasse. 'EspinasseMargaret, Robert Hooke (London, 1956).
151.
Faulhaber. FaulhaberC., “Construction of large telescope lenses”, Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … for the year ending June 30, 1904 (Washington, 1905) 163–170.
152.
Feixmann. FellmannEmil A., “Ueber Asphaerische Linsen. Ein Beitrag zur Problemgeschichte der Optik”, Physis. Rivista di storia della scienza, v (1963) 166–172.
153.
Findlay. FindlayG. M., “The debt of medicine to microscopy”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lx (1940) 36–40.
154.
Forschungen zur geschichte der optik. Forschungen zur Geschichte der Optik (Beilagehefte zur Zeitschrift für Instrumentenkunde). Published occasionally, i, part 1, December 1928—iii, part 3, August 1943.
155.
Foster. FosterW. D., “Lionel Smith Beale (1828–1906) and the beginnings of clinical pathology”, Medical history, ii, no. 4 (Oct. 1958) 269–273.
156.
Frison [1]. FrisonEdward, “A Leeuwenhoek microscope. An account of the almost-forgotten instrument in the Henri van Heurck collection at the Natural History Museum, Antwerp, with a brief historical survey”, The Microscope. The British journal of microscopy and photomicrography, incorporating the entomological monthly, vi, no. 11 (Jan.-Feb. 1948) 281–287.
157.
Frison [2]. FrisonEdward, “Adams' microscopes and microtomes, I. With notes on instruments by Magny”, idem, viii (1951) 199–206.
158.
Frison [3]. FrisonEdward, L'évolution de la partie optique du microscope au cours du dixneuvième siècle les test objects, les test-, probe- et typen-platten (Leiden, 1954).
159.
Frison [4]. FrisonEdward, “Visual and photographic resolution of Nobert's various test plates 1845–1876”, The Microscope …., xi, no. 2 (Sept.-Oct. 1956) 35–42.
160.
Frison [5]. FrisonEdward, “The belated construction of water-immersion objectives in Britain”, Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, series 4, v, no. 13 (Feb. 1961) 349–357.
161.
Frison [6]. FrisonEdward, “De microscoop, van Dokter Somme, en de bruikbaarheid van de achtiende en vroeg negentiende eeuwse samengestelde microscopen voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek”, Scientorium historia, v (1963) 1–10.
162.
Frison [7]. FrisonEdward, “Bij de driehonderdste verjaring van Robert Hooke's ‘Micrographia’ (1665–1965). De opgang van de microscopie in England in de tweede helft der 17 de eeuw”, idem, vii (1965) 92–104.
163.
Frison [8]. FrisonEdward, “Robert Koch's eerste tekeningen en fotomicrografieen van bactérien (1876–1877) zijn wetenschappelijke uitrusting, zijn vriendenen raadgevers”, idem, ix, no. 4 (1967) 211–226.
164.
Frison [9]. FrisonEdward, Henri van Heurck Museum. Geillustreerde inventaris van de historische microscopen onderdelen en uitrusting (Antwerp: Koninklijke Maatschappij voor Dierkunde van Antwerpen, 1968). [Descriptions in Dutch, German, English and French.]
165.
Gage. GageSimon Henry. “Microscopy in America (1830–1945)”, ed. RichardsOscar W., Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, lxxxiii, no. 4, Supplement (Oct. 1964).
166.
Gause [1]. GauseHans, “Ernst Abbe in memoriam”, Jena review, x, part 1 (1965) 71–75.
167.
Gause [2]. GauseHans, “Carl Zeiss. On the 150th anniversary of his birth0day 11th September 1966”, Supplement to Jena review, xi, pt. 4 (1966) 2–12.
168.
Gause [3]. GauseHans, “The slit ultramicroscope after Siedentopf and Zsigmondy–an historical and optical study”, Jena review, xi, part 6 (1966) 327–333.
169.
Gause & Görlich. GauseHansGörlichPaul, “Beiträge zu Abbes Tätigkeit in gelehrten Gesellschaften und seine Korrespondenz mit Gelehrten seiner Zeit”, Jenaer Jahrbuch 1966 (Jena, 1966) 19–37.
170.
Gaythorpe [1]. GaythorpeS. B., “On a method for deducing approximately the focal lengths and magnifying powers of early telescopes”, Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, lxxxv, no. 7 (May, 1925) 659–662.
171.
Gaythorpe [2]. GaythorpeS. B., “On a Galilean telescope made about 1640 by William Gascoigne inventor of the filar micrometer”, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, xxxix, no. 7 (April 1929) 238–241.
172.
Gernsheim [1]. HelmutGernsheimAlison, The history of photography from the earliest use of the camera obscura in the eleventh century up to 1914 (Oxford, 1955).
173.
Gernsheim [2]. HelmutGernsheimAlison, A concise history of photography (London, 1965).
174.
Girod. GirodChristian, “De l'occhialino de Galilée au microscope electronique”, La revue lyonnaise de medecine, xvii, no. 7 (April, 1968) 321–332.
175.
Grondona. GrondonaFelice, “La struttura dei reni da F. Ruysch a W. Bowman”, Physis. Revista internazionale di storia della scienza, vii (1965) 281–316.
176.
Gunther [1]. GuntherR. T., Early science in Oxford, i, “Chemistry, mathematics, physics and surveying” (Oxford, 1923; reprinted London, 1967).
177.
Gunther [2]. GuntherR. T., Early science in Oxford, ii, “Astronomy” (Oxford, 1923; reprinted London, 1967).
178.
Gunther [3]. GuntherR. T., Early science in Cambridge (Oxford, 1937).
179.
Hale & Ellerman. HaleGeorge E.EllermanFerdinand, “Rumford spectroheliograph of the Yerkes observatory”, Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … for the year ending June 30, 1904 (Washington, 1905) 131–162.
180.
Hall [1]. HallA. R., “Further optical experiments of Isaac Newton”, Annals of science, xi, no. 1 (March 1955) 27–43.
181.
Hall [2]. HallA. R., Hooke's Micrographia 1665–1965 (London, 1966).
182.
Hardy. HardyM. G., “Pocket microscope by Edmund Culpeper”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 1 (1967) 234–236.
Heal [1]. HealAmbrose, London tradesmen's cards of the XVIII century. An account of their origin and use (London, 1925).
185.
Heal [2]. HealAmbrose, The signboards of old London shops (London, 1947).
186.
Hellman. HellmanC. D., “John Bird (1709–1776), mathematical instrumentmaker in the Strand”, Isis, xvii, pt. 1 (Jan, 1932) 127–153.
187.
Heron–Allen & Rousselet. Heron-AllenE.RousseletCharles F., “Prolegomena towards a study of the progress and development of vision and definition under the microscope (1673–1848)”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, xxxvi (1916) 160–175.
188.
Hewlett. HewlettP. S., “Visibility and resolution of periodic structure in oblique darkground illumination: Images of the diatom, Amphlipleura lindheimeri”. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxxxvi, pt. 2 (Dec. 1966) 103–121.
189.
Heywood. HeywoodHarold, “Clay and Court—pioneer collectors of microscopes”. Microscopy, the journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, xxxi, pt. 5 (Feb, 1969) 109–112.
190.
Hoff [1]. HoffHebbel E., “A classic of microscopy: An early, if not the first, observation on the fluidity of the axoplasm, micromanipulation and the use of the cover-slip”, Bulletin of the history of medicine, xxxiii, no. 4 (1959) 375–379.
191.
Hoff [2]. HoffHebbel E., “Jan Ingen-Housz and the cover-slip”, idem, xxxvi, no. 4 (1962) 365–368.
192.
Hölzl & Bancher. HölzlJ.BancherE., “Österreichische Mikroskope aus drei Jahrhunderten”, Mikroskopie. Zentralblatt für mikroskopische Forschung und Methodik, xvi, no. 3–4 (1961) 65–83.
193.
Hoppe. HoppeE., Geschichte der Optik (Leipzig, 1926).
194.
Horský & Škopová. HorskýZdeněkŠkopováOtilie, Astronomy, gnomonics. A catalogue of instruments of the 15th to the 19th centuries in the collections of the National Technical Museum, Prague (Prague, 1968).
195.
Hughes [1]. HughesArthur, “Studies in the history of microscopy: 1. The influence of achromatism”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxxv (1955) 1–22.
196.
Hughes [2]. HughesArthur, “Studies in the history of microscopy: 2. The later history of the achromatic microscope”, idem, lxxvi (1956) 47–60.
197.
Humbert. HumbertPierre, “Les études de Peiresc sur la vision”, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences, iv, no. 16 (July, 1951) 654–659.
198.
Hunt. HuntRobert, “The history of some discoveries of photography”, Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … for the year ending June 30, 1904 (Washington, 1905) 287–308.
199.
Inventory [1] Belgium [1]. Inventaire des instruments scientifiques historiques conservés en Belgique, 2 parts (Brussels, 1959, 1960).
200.
Inventory [2] Belgium [2]. Inventaire des microscopes appartenant à l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (Brussels, 1965).
201.
Inventory [3] France. Inventaire des instruments scientifiques historiques conservés en France (Paris, 1964).
202.
Inventory [4] Italy. Inventaire des instruments conservés en Italie (5 vols, Milan, 1963).
203.
Inventory [5] Poland. Inventory published on microfilm by the Polska Akademia Nauk, Warsaw, 1968.
204.
Inventory [6] Russia. MaǐstrovL. E., ed., Nauchnye pribory. Pribory i instrumenty istoricheskogo znacheniya (Moscow, 1968).
205.
Jacker. JackerCorinne, Window on the unknown. A history of the microscope (New York, 1966).
206.
Jelley. JelleyEdwin E., “A review of crystallographic microscopy”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxii (1942) 93–102.
207.
Jobst. JobstRudolf, “120 years of scientific instrument manufacture in Jena”, Supplement to Jena review, xi, pt. 4 (1966) 24–31.
208.
Källström & Ahlström. KällströmO.AhlströmOtto, “The telescope in the baton”, The optician, cxviii, nos. 3060–1 (25 Nov. & 2 Dec. 1949) 477–480, 505–506.
209.
Keohane. KeohaneK. W., “Reflecting microscopes”, Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, series 4, iv, no. 2 (Aug. 1954) 89–96.
210.
Keynes. KeynesGeoffrey, A bibliography of Dr Robert Hooke (Oxford, 1960).
211.
King [1]. KingH. C., The house of Dollond. Two hundred years of optical service 1750–1951 (London, 1951).
212.
King [2]. KingH. C., The history of the telescope (London, 1955).
213.
Kirchvogel. KirchvogelPaul Adolf, “Das magische Glas aus der Frühzeit der Mikroskopie”, Die BASF (Werkzeitschrift der Badischen Anilin- & Soda-Fabrik AG), x, pt. 2 (1960), 5 pp.
214.
Kobayashi. KobayashiTeisaku, sekka-zusetsu. Illustrations of snow crystals written by Toshitsura Doi (1789–1848. A commentary on the sekka-zusetsu (Tokyo, 1968).
215.
Kosobutskiǐ [1]. KosobutskiǐV. I., “A brief survey of the exhibits of the Museum of the History of Microscopy (Institute of the History of Science and Technology of the U.S.S.R. Academy of Sciences)”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 3 (July, 1967) 356–361.
216.
Kosobutskiǐ [2]. KosobutskiǐV. I., “In the Museum of the History of Microscopy”, Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniya i tekhniki, ii (xxvii) (1969), 98–100. [In Russian.]
217.
Levene [1]. LeveneJohn R., “The true inventors of the keratoscope and photokeratoscope”, British journal for the history of science, ii, pt. 4 (Dec. 1965) 324–342.
218.
Levene [2]. LeveneJohn R., “Thomas Young's contribution to curved image surface theory”, The optician, cli (4 Feb, 1966) 111–112.
219.
Levene [3]. LeveneJohn R., “Sir David Brewster and the measurement of refractive power”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, i, pt. 2 (March 1966) 71–74.
220.
Levene [4]. LeveneJohn R., “Early studies in visual optics, with particular reference to the mechanism of accomodation”, idem, ii, pt. 1 (Jan. 1967) 139–150. Also published in Historical aspects of microscopy, ed., BradburyS.TurnerG. L' E. (Cambridge, 1967) 139–150.
221.
Levene [5]. LeveneJohn R., “Sources of confusion in Descartes' illustrations, with reference to the history of contact lenses”, History of science, vi (1967) 90–96.
222.
Levene [6]. LeveneJohn R., “The ‘De la Hire’ 17th century contact lens”, Contacts, xxv, no. 2 (March-April 1969), 13–21.
223.
Lewis. FrederickT. Lewis“The advent of microscopes in America with notes on their earlier history”, The scientific monthly, lvii (1943) 249–259.
224.
Linck. LinckGottlobAbbeErnst. Rede zum Gedächtnis seines 25 Todestages am 14 Januar 1930 gehalten im Auftrag des Akademischen Senats der Landesuniversität Jena in der Aula (Jenaer akademische Rede, Heft 10 (Jena, 1930)).
225.
Lindberg. LindbergDavid C.“The theory of pinhole images from antiquity to the thirteenth century”, Archive for history of exact sciences, v (1968) 154–176.
226.
Lister. ListerJ. J., “On the limit to defining-power, in vision with the unassisted eye, the telescope, and the microscope”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, xxxiii (1913) 34–35 [the work was done c. 1831 and never previously published].
227.
Lohne. LohneJ., “Thomas Harriot (1560–1621). The Tycho Brahe of optics”, Centaurus, vi (1959) 113–121.
228.
Luther. LutherFrederic, “The earliest experiments in microphotography”, Isis, xli, pts. 3–4 (Dec. 1950) 277–281.
229.
Maddison [1]. MaddisonFrancis, “Early astronomical and mathematical instruments. A brief survey of sources and modern studies”, History of science, ii (1963) 17–50.
230.
Maddison [2]. MaddisonFrancis, “Galileo and the history of scientific instruments”, Saggi su Galileo Galilei (Pisa, forthcoming).
231.
Marek. MarekJiří, “Kepler's ideas in the development of optics in the first half of the 17th century”, Actes du XIIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sciences, 25–31 août 1968 (Paris, forthcoming).
232.
Martin [1]. MartinL. C., “Some visual factors affecting the use of optical instruments”, Proceedings of the optical convention 1926, pt. 1 (London [1926]) 166–184.
233.
Martin [2]. MartinL. C., “John Dollond memorial lecture”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxxx, pt. 4 (May, 1962) 247–258.
234.
Martin. MartinL. V., “The Wenham binocular”, Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, xxix, no. 3 (Aug. 1962) 57–63 & no. 5 (Feb. 1963) 111–117.
235.
Marion. MartonL., Early history of the electron microscope (San Francisco, 1968). (Also W. Heffer & Sons Ltd, Cambridge.)
236.
Melnikov. MelnikovO. A., “On the history of the development of astrospectroscopy in Russia and in the U.S.S.R.”, Istoriko-astronomicheskie issledovaniya, iii (1957) 9–258. [In Russian.]
237.
Michael. MichaelM. J., “Numerical aperture reconsidered”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, xv (1895) 609–623.
238.
Michel. MichelHenri, Scientific instruments in art and history, transi. MaddisonR. E. W.MaddisonFrancis R. (London, 1967).
239.
Mitchell. MitchellMargaret, “The historic Nurnberg spectacles”, Dioptic review and the British journal of physiological optics, n. s. iv, no. 1 (January, 1944) 1–4.
240.
Mulvey. MulveyT., “The history of the electron microscope”. Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 1 (Jan, 1967) 201–227. Also published in Historical aspects of microscopy, ed. BradburyS.TurnerG. L' E. (Cambridge, 1967) 201–227.
Müürsepp & Forbes. MüürseppPeeterForbesEric, “The astronomical museum at the old Tartu Observatory”, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, lxxviii, no. 6 (1968) 462–466.
243.
Needham. NeedhamJoseph, Science & civilisation in China, iv, pt. I, “Physical and physical technology: Physics” (Cambridge, 1962).
244.
Needham & Lu. NeedhamJosephGwei-DjenLu, “The optick artists of Chiangsu”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 1 (Jan. 1967) 113–138.
245.
Also published in Historical aspects of microscopy, ed., BradburyS.TurnerG. L'E. (Cambridge, 1967) 113–138.
246.
Nelson. NelsonEdward M., “Microscopic vision”, Proceedings of the Bristol Naturalists' Society, n.s. viii, pt. 2 (1896–97) 141–166.
247.
Neumann. NeumannErwin, “A microscope by Alexis Magny”, The connoisseur (December, 1955) 246.
248.
Nicolson. NicolsonMarjorie [H.], Science and imagination (Ithaca, N. Y., 1956). [See especially chap. 1, “The telescope and imagination” and chap. 6, “The microscope and English imagination”.]
Olmsted. OlmstedJohn W., “The ‘application’ of telescopes to astronomical instruments, 1667–1669. A study in historical method”, Isis, xl, pt. 3 (Aug. 1949) 213–225.
251.
Otto [1]. OttoLudwig, “Zur Kenntnis der zusammengesetzten Mikroskope des Giuseppe Campani (1635–1715) in Rom”, Mikroskopie. Zentralblatt für Mikroskopische Forschung und Methodik, xxi, no. 11–12 (1966) 306–313.
252.
Otto [2]. OttoLudwig, “Beispiele zur Entwicklung der Abbildungsgüte des Mikroskops”, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Math.-Nat. R., xvii, pt. 5 (1968) 793–798.
253.
Otto [3]. OttoLudwig, “A microscope by John Dollond (1706–1761) from the collection of the Optical Museum in Jena”, Supplement to Jena review, xiii, no. 6 (1968) 5 pp.
254.
Otto [4]. OttoLudwig, “Microscopes of Simon Plössl (1794–1868) from the collection of the Optical Museum in Jena”, idem, xiii, no. 6 (1968), 10 pp.
255.
Palmer. PalmerChetwynd, “A note upon the Wenham binocular”, Watson's microscope record, no. 12 (Sept. 1927) 23–24.
256.
Parsons. The scientific papers of William Parsons, third earl of Rosse 1800–1867 (collected and republished by the Hon. Sir Charles Parsons) (London, 1926).
257.
Peddle. PeddleC. J., “The manufacture of optical glass”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxiii, no. 2 (1921–22), 103–130.
258.
Pedersen. PedersenOlaf, “Sagredo's optical researches”, Centaurus, xiii (1968) 139–150.
259.
Pirenne, PirenneMaurice H., “Seeing in the near dark”, Discovery, xxiii, no. 7 (July 1962) 16–22.
260.
Pollard, PollardA. Alan, “The mechanical construction of the microscope from a historical stand-point, with special reference to certain instruments, now in the Science Museum, South Kensington”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxiii, no. 5 (1921–22) 334–349.
261.
Pollard, HughH.PollardB. C., “The evolution of the microscope”, The illustrated London news, (14 Feb. 1925) 250–252.
262.
Price [1]. PriceDerek J., “The early observatory instruments of Trinity College, Cambridge”, Annals of science, viii, no. 1 (March 1952) 1–12.
263.
Price [2]. PriceDerek J., “The manufacture of scientific instruments from c. 1500 to c. 1700”, in A history of technology, ed., SingerC., iii (Oxford, 1957) 620–647.
264.
Rasmussen. RasmussenOtto Durham, Chinese eyesight and spectacles (re-written from researches begun in 1908 and continued over a period of twenty-five years and recorded in several pamphlets, booklets and short treatises from 1915 to 1949 (Printed for the author at Tonbridge [1949]).
265.
Reed. ReedJ. L., “Opticians' signs and trade cards of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries”, The optician, cxviii, no. 3054 (14 Oct. 1949) 313–316.
266.
Repsold. RepsoldJ. A., Zur Geschichte der astronomischen Messwerkzeuge von 1450 bis 1830 (Leipzig, 1908).
267.
Richards [1]. RichardsOscar W., “The history of the microscope; selected references and notes”, Transactions of the American Microscopical Society, lxviii (1949) 55–57, 206–207, 275–276.
268.
Richards [2]. RichardsOscar W., “American microscope makers and introduction to the collection”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxxxiii, pts. 1 & 2 (June, 1964) 123–126.
269.
Riekher. RiekherRolf, Fernrohre und ihre Meister. Eine Entwicklungsgeschichte der Fernrohrtechnik (Berlin, 1957).
270.
Robbins. RobbinsFrank, “The Radcliffe Observatory, Oxford”, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, xl, no. 8 (July 1930) 310–326.
271.
Robinson, RobinsonE. Eric, “The Lunar Society and the improvement of scientific instruments: II”, Annals of science, xiii, no. 1 (March 1957) 1–8.
272.
Robinson, RobinsonS. S. H., “A short history of the microscope with special reference to the microscopes of Messrs. Powell & Lealand, London”, Lincolnshire Naturalists Union, xii, no. 1 (Nov. 1948) 12–31.
273.
Ronchi [1]. RonchiVasco, “Nouveaux points de vue à propos de l'invention du microscope”, Archives internationales d'hisloire de sciences, vi, no. 23–24 (April-Sept. 1953) 227–231.
274.
Ronchi [2]. RonchiVasco, Histoire de la lumière, Transl. TatonJ. (Paris, 1956).
275.
Ronchi [3]. RonchiVasco, “Classical optics is a mathematical science”, Archive for history of exact sciences, i (1961) 160–171.
276.
Ronchi [4]. RonchiVasco, Galileo e il suo cannocchiale (Turin, 1964).
277.
Rooseboom [1]. RooseboomMaria, “Concerning the optical qualities of some microscopes made by Leeuwenhoek”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lix (1939) 177–183.
278.
Rooseboom [2]. RooseboomMaria, “Die holländischen Optiker Jan und Harmanus van Deijl und ihre Mikroskope”, Janus, xliv (1940) 185–197.
279.
Rooseboom [3]. RooseboomMaria, “Some notes upon the life and work of certain Netherlands artificers of microscopic preparations at the end of the XVIIIth century and the beginning of the XIXth”, idem, xliv (1940) 24–44.
280.
Rooseboom [4]. RooseboomMaria, “The National Museum of the History of Science at Leyden”, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences, iii, no. 10 (Jan. 1950) 129–135.
281.
Rooseboom [5]. RooseboomMaria, Bijdrage tot de geschiedenis der instrumentmakerskunst in de noordelijk nederlanden tot omstreehs 1840 (Leyden, 1950).
282.
Rooseboom [6]. RooseboomMaria, Catalogus van vergrootglas tot oog der wetenschap. 2 1/2 eeuw microscopie. 25 Juni—19 September 1954 (Leiden, 1954).
Rooseboom [8]. RooseboomMaria, “The introduction of mounting media in microscopy and their importance for biological science”, Actes du VIIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sciences, Florence-Milan 3–9 septembre 1956, ii (Florence, 1958) 602–607.
285.
Rooseboom [9]. RooseboomMaria, “The history of the microscope”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 2 (April 1967) 266–293.
286.
Roper. FreemanC. S. Roper, Catalogue of works on the microscope and of those referring to microscopical subjects in the library of Freeman C. S. Roper, ([London], printed for private circulation, 1865).
287.
Roscoe. RoscoeHenry E., Spectrum analysis. Six lectures, delivered in 1868, before the Society of Apothecaries of London (London, 1869).
288.
Rosen [1]. RosenE., The naming of the telescope (New York, 1947).
289.
Rosen [2]. RosenE., “Galileo and the telescope”, Scientific monthly, lxxii, no. 3 (March, 1951) 180–182.
290.
Rosen [3]. RosenE., “When did Galileo make his first telescope?”Centaurusii (1951) 44–51.
291.
Rosen [4]. RosenE., “Did Roger Bacon invent eyeglasses?”, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences, vii, no. 26 (Jan.-March 1954) 3–15.
292.
Rosen [5]. RosenE., “The invention of eyeglasses”, Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences, xi (1956) 13–53 & 183–218.
293.
Rotta. RottaSalvatore, “Sulla costruzione e diffusione in Italia dei telescopi a riflessione”, Le Machine. Bollettino dell' Istituto italiano per la storia della tecnica, i, nos. 2–3 (Dec. 1968) 90–102.
294.
Royal Microscopical Society. “Discussion on the Abbe Theory”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, xlix (1929) 123–142, 228–264. [A series of eleven papers on the Abbe theory of image formation and the resolving power of microscopes.]
295.
Ryan [1]. RyanW. F., “John Russell, R. A., and early lunar mapping”, Smithsonian journal of history, i (1966) 27–48.
296.
Ryan [2]. RyanW. F., “Some Russian contributions to the history of the microscope”. Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 3 (July 1967) 362–365.
297.
Ryan [3]. RyanW. F., “Limelight on Eastern Europe: The great magic lantern slides at the Royal Polytechnic”, forthcoming.
298.
Sabra. SabraA. I., Theories of light from Descartes to Newton (London, 1967).
299.
Saint–Blanquat. de Saint-BlanquatHenri, “Galilée, la mouche et Jupiter ou la découverte des deux infinis”, Science et avenir, no. 189 (Nov. 1962) 754–760.
300.
Salmon. SalmonM. V., “The Quekett sale catalogue”. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, xxix, no. 1 (Feb. 1962) 9–11.
301.
Sampson & Conrady. SampsonR. A.ConradyA. E., “On three Huygens lenses in the possession of the Royal Society of London”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, xlix, pt. 4 (1929) 289–299.
302.
Savelli. SavelliRoberto, “Giovan Battista Amici, botanist. (On the first centenary of his death)”, Physis. Rivista internazionale di storia della scienza, vii (1965) 5–47.
303.
Schütz. SchültzWilliam, “Ernst Abbe. University teacher and industrial physicist”, Supplement to Jena review, xi, pt. 4 (1966) 13–23.
304.
Shcheglov. ShcheglovV. P., “The James Short reflector no. 1341”, Istoriko-astronomicheskie issledovaniya, ix (1966) 291–295. [In Russian.]
305.
Sherwood Taylor. TaylorF. Sherwood, “From magic to science”, Proceedings of the Royal Philosophical Society of Glasgow, lxxvi, pt. 1 (1951). 16 pp.
306.
Shurlock. Fredk. ShurlockW., “Experimental studies in diffraction”, [in 4 parts]. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, li (1931) 24–31, 127–135, 272–282, 408–413.
307.
Singer [1]. SingerCharles, “The dawn of microscopical discovery”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, xxxv, pt. 4 (August, 1915) 317–340.
308.
Singer [2]. SingerCharles, “Steps leading to the invention of the first optical apparatus”, Studies in the history and method of science, ed. SingerC., ii (Oxford, 1921).
309.
Singer [3]. SingerCharles, “The earliest figures of microscopic objects”, Endeavour, xii, no. 48 (Oct. 1953) 197–201.
310.
Singer [4]. SingerCharles, “The first English microscopist, Robert Hooke (1625 to 1703)”, idem, xiv, no. 53 (Jan. 1955) 12–18.
311.
Skopec. SkopecRudolf, Photographie im Wandel der Zeiten (Amsterdam, 1964).
312.
Smith. SmithC. S., A history of metallography (Chicago, 1960).
313.
Sobol' [1]. Sobol'S. L., Istoriya mikroskopa i mikroskopicheskikh issledovani v Rossii v XVIII veke (Moscow-Leningrad, 1949).
314.
Sobol' [2]. Sobol'S. L., “On the history of the invention of the achromatic microscope”, Actes du VIIIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sciences, Florence–Milan 3–9 septembre 1956, ii (Florence, 1958) 800–803.
315.
Sokolovskaya. SolokovskayaZ., “The importance of instruments in the development of astronomic knowledge”, Actes du XIIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sciences, Paris 25–31 août 1968 (Paris, forthcoming).
316.
Steavenson. SteavensonW. H., “A peep into Herschel's workshop” and “Catalogue of instruments made and (or) used by Sir William Herschel, as preserved at Slough and examined there in 1924, May and June”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxvi, no. 4 (1924–25) 210–220, 221–238.
317.
Steudel. SteudelJ.“Leibniz et les recherches microscopiques”Actes du XIIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sci0ences, Paris 25–31 août 1968 (Paris, forthcoming).
318.
Stevens. StevensHenryHariotThomas. The mathematician the philosopher and the scholar, developed chiefly from dormant materials with notices of his associates including biographical and bibliographical disquisitions upon the materials of the history of “Ould Virginia” (London, 1900).
Strang. StrangJ. Martin, “Optical methods of distance measurement”, Proceedings of the Optical Convention 1926, pt. II (London [1926]) 683–701.
321.
Taton. TatonRené, ed., Enseignement et diffusion des sciences en France au XVIIIe siècle (Histoire de la pensée, xi) (Paris, 1964).
322.
Taylor [1]. TaylorE. G. R., The mathematical practitioners of Tu0dor & Stuart England (Cambridge, 1954).
323.
Taylor [2]. TaylorE. G. R., The mathematical practitioners of Hanoverian England 1714–1840 (Cambridge, 1966).
324.
Taylor et al. TaylorE. WilfredWilsonJ. SimmsMaxwellP. D. Scott, At the sign of the orrery. The origins of the firm of Cooke, Troughton & Simms Ltd., 2nd ed. (York, 1960).
325.
Thomas [1]. ThomasD. B., The first colour motion pictures (A Science Museum monograph) (London, 1969).
326.
Thomas [2]. ThomasD. B., The Science Museum photography collection (London, 1969).
327.
Thomas, ThomasG. G. B., “John Hill and ‘The construction of timber’”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, iii, pt. 4 (Oct. 1968) 186–209.
328.
Thompson. ThompsonSilvanus P., “Inaugural address of the president”, Proceedings of the Optical Convention 1912 (London, 1912) 1–23.
329.
Turnbull. TurnbullHerbert Westren, ed., James Gregory tercentenary memorial volume containing his correspondence with John Collins and his hitherto unpublished mathematical manuscripts, together with addresses and essays communicated to the Royal Society of Edinburgh, July 4, 1938 (London, 1939).
330.
Turnbull & Scott. TurnbullH. W.ScottJ. F., The correspondence of Isaac Newton, i–iv (Cambridge, 1959–1967).
331.
Turner [1]. TurnerG. L' E., “The Woodward photomicrographs of Nobert's nineteenth-band test-plate”, Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, xxix (1964) 289–295.
332.
Turner [2]. TurnerG. L' E., “Dr J. J. Woodward: Microscopist”. Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, i, no. 1 (Jan. 1966), 32–39.
333.
Turner [3]. TurnerG. L' E., “A magic mirror of Buddhist significance”, Oriental art, xii (1966) 94–98.
334.
Turner [4]. TurnerG. L' E., “Decorative tooling on 17th and 18th century microscopes and telescopes”, Physis. Rivista internazionale di storia della scienza, viii (1966) 99–128.
335.
Turner [5]. TurnerG. L' E., “Powell & Lealand: Trade mark of perfection”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, i, no. 3 (July 1966) 172–183.
336.
Turner [6]. TurnerG. L' E., “The microscope as a technical frontier in science”, Proceedings of the Royal Microscopical Society, ii, pt. 1 (Jan. 1967) 175–199. Also published in Historical aspects of microscopy, ed. BradburyS.TurnerG. L. E. (Cambridge, 1967) 175–199.
337.
Turner [7]. TurnerG. L' E., “The use of scientific collections for research”, Museums journal, lxvi (1967) 272–275.
338.
Turner [8]. TurnerG. L' E., “Amida's mirror”, The opthalmic optician, vii, no. 8 (15 April 1967) 392–394.
339.
Turner [9]. TurnerG. L' E., “A portrait of James Short F.R.S., attributable to Benjamin Wilson F.R.S.”, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, xxii (1967) 105–112.
340.
Turner [10]. TurnerG. L' E., “The auction sales of the Earl of Bute's instruments, 1793”, Annals of science, xxiii (1967) 213–242.
341.
Turner [11]. TurnerG. L' E., “The contributions to science of Friedrich Adolph Nobert”, Bulletin of the Institute of Physics and the Physical Society, xviii (1967) 338–348.
342.
Turner [12]. TurnerG. L' E., “F. A. Nobert's invention of artificial resolution tests for the optical microscope”, Actes du XIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sciences, Varsovie-Cracovie 24–31 août 1965, iii (Warsaw, 1968) 435–440.
343.
Turner [13]. TurnerG. L' E., “The rise and fall of the jewel microscope 1824–1837”, Microscopy, the journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, xxxi (1968) 85–94.
344.
Turner [14]. TurnerG. L' E., “Hugh Powell, James Smith and Andrew Ross: Makers of microscopes”, in Mid-nineteenth century scientists, ed. NorthJohn (Oxford, 1969) 104–138.
345.
Turner [15]. TurnerG. L' E., “James Short and the reflecting telescope”, Actes du XIIe Congrès international d'Histoire des Sciences, Paris 23–31 août 1968 (Paris, forthcoming).
346.
Turner [16]. TurnerG. L' E., “James Short F.R.S. and his contribution to the construction of reflecting telescopes”, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, xxiv (1969) 91–108.
347.
Turner [17]. TurnerG. L' E., “Henry Baker”, art. in Dictionary of scientific biography (New York, forthcoming).
348.
Turner & Bradbury. TurnerG. L' E.BradburyS., “An electron microscopical examination of Nobert's finest test-plate of twenty bands”, Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society, lxxxv, pt. 4 (Aug. 1966) 435–447.
349.
TurnerTurnerH. H. H., “Some reflections suggested by the application of photography to astronomical research”, Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … for the year ending June 30, 1904 (Washington, 1905) 171–184.
350.
Van Cittert [1]. van CittertP. H., “Een historische lens”. De natuur (April 1929), 2 pp.
351.
Van Cittert [2]. van CittertP. H., Descriptive catalogue of the collection of microscopes in charge of the Utrecht University Museum with an introductory historical survey of the resolving power of the microscope (Groningen, 1934).
352.
Van Cittert [3]. van CittertP. H., “The optical properties of the ‘van Leeuwenhoek’ microscope in possession of the University of Utrecht”, Proceedings of the Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, xxxvii, no. 5 (1934) 290–293.
353.
Van Cittert [4]. van CittertP. H., “Enkele opmerkingen betreffende de historische ontwikkeling van het oplossend vermögen van het microscoop”, Nederlands tijdschrift voor natuurkunde, ii, pt. 2 (1935) 51–62.
354.
Van Cittert [5]. van CittertP. H., “Einige Bemerkungen über den Einfluss des Kondensors”, Mikroskopie. Zentralblatt für mikroskopische Forschung und Methodik, iii (1948) 92–95.
355.
Van Cittert [6]. van CittertP. H., “On the use of glass globules as microscope-lenses”, Proceedings of the Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, series B, lvii, no. 1 (1954) 103–111.
356.
Van Cittert & Van Cittert-Eymers [1]. van CittertP. H.van Citter-EymersJ. G., “The Amici-microscopes about 1850 in possession of the University of Utrecht”, idem, Vol. 50, no. 5 (1947) 554–503.
357.
Van Cittert & Van Cittert-Eymers [2]. van CittertP. H.van Citter-EymersJ. G., “Some remarks on the development of the compound microscopes in the 19th century”, idem, series B liv, no. 1 (1951) 73–80.
358.
Van der Pas. van der PasP. W., “The earliest microscopical observations in Japan”, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences, xvii, nos. 68–69 (July-Dec. 1964) 223–238.
359.
Van der Star. van der StarP., Descriptive catalogue of the simple microscopes in the Rijksmuseum voor de Geschiedenis der Natuurwetenschappen at Leyden (Leiden, 1953).
360.
Verleyen. VerleyenE. J. B., “Henri van Heurck 28 août 1838–13 mars 1909. Sa vie—son oeuvre—ses collections”, Bulletin de la Societé royale botanique belgique, lxxv (1943) 57–68.
361.
Vogel et al. VogelWernerGerthKlausHeindorfWolfgang, “On the development of optical glass”, Jena review, x, pt. 1 (1965) 75–86.
362.
Volkmann. VolkmannHarald, Carl Zeiss und Ernst Abbe. Ihr Leben und ihr Werk (Deutsches Museum Abhandlungen und Berichte, xxxiv Jahrgang, Heft 2, 1966) (Munich, 1966).
363.
Vollgraff. VollgraffJ. A., “Christiaan (ou Christiaen) Huygens 1629–1695”, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences, ii, no. 5 (Oct 1948) 165–179.
364.
Von Pflugk. von PflugkAlbert, “Die Ordnungen der Nürnberger Brillenmacher”, Forschungen zur Geschichte der Optik, i, pt. 4 (Oct. 1930) 203–222.
365.
Von Rohr [1]. von RohrMoritz, Die binokularen Instrumente nach Quellen und bis zum Ausgang von 1910 bearbeitet, 2nd ed. (Berlin, 1920).
366.
Von Rohr [2]. von RohrMoritz, Die Brille als optisches Instrument (Berlin, 1921).
367.
Von Rohr [3]. von RohrMoritz, “The Thomas Young Oration: Contributions to the history of the spectacle trade from the earliest times to Thomas Young's appearance”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxv, no. 2 (1923–24) 41–72.
368.
Von Rohr [4]. von RohrMoritz, “Additions to our knowledge of old spectacles: A summary of papers published in 1923–24 relating to the subject of the Thomas Young oration of 1923”, idem, xxvi (1924–25) 175–187.
369.
Vaon Rohr [5]. von RohrMoritz, “Fraunhofer's work and its present-day significance”, idem, xxvii (1925–26) 277–294.
370.
Von Rohr [6]. von RohrMoritz, Joseph Fraunhofers Leben, Leistungen und Wirksamkeit (Leipzig, 1929).
371.
Von Rohr [7]. von RohrMoritz, “Zur Geschichte der Zeissischen Werkstätte bis zum Tode Ernst Abbes. Mit Beiträgen von Max Fischer und August Köhler”, Forschungen zur Geschichte der Optik, ii, pt. 1 (July, 1936) 1–119.
372.
Von Rohr [8]. von RohrMoritz, “Gedanken zur Geschichte der Brillenherstelling”, idem, ii, pt. 2 (Jan, 1937) 121–159.
373.
Von Rohr & Boegehold. von RohrMoritzBoegeholdHans, Das Brillenglas als optisches Instrument (Berlin, 1934).
374.
Warner. WarnerDeborah Jean, Alvan Clark & Sons, artists in optics (United States National Museum Bulletin 274) (Washington, D. C., 1968).
375.
Waterhouse [1]. WaterhouseJ., “Notes on the early history of the camera obscura”, Photographic journal, n.s. xxv (1901) 270–290.
376.
Waterhouse [2]. WaterhouseJ., “Historical notes on early photographic optics”, Journal of the Camera Club, xxvi (1902) 115–126.
377.
Waterhouse [3]. WaterhouseJ., “The beginnings of photography—a chapter in the history of the development of photography with the salts of silver”, Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution … for the year ending June 30, 1903 (Washington, 1904) 333–361.
378.
Waterhouse [4]. WaterhouseJ., “The early history of telephotography”, Proceedings of the Optical Convention No 1 (London, 1905) 115–121.
Wheatland. WheatlandDavid P., The apparatus of science at Harvard 1765–1800. Collection of historical scientific instruments Harvard University (Cambridge, Mass., 1968).
382.
Whipple [1]. WhippleRobert S., “Presidential Address: The design and construction of scientific instruments”, Transactions of the Optical Society, xxii (1920–21) 35–52.
383.
Whipple [2]. WhippleRobert S., “An old catalogue and what it tells us of the scientific instruments and curios collected by Queen Charlotte and King George III”, Proceedings of the Optical Convention 1926, pt. II (London, [1926]), 502–528.
384.
Whipple [3]. WhippleRobert S., “Some scientific instrument makers of the eighteenth century”, Journal of scientific instruments, vii, nos. 8 & 9(Aug. & Sept. 1930) 241–253, 273–281.
385.
Whipple [4]. WhippleRobert S., “Instruments in science and industry”, Nature, cxliv (9 Sept. 1939) 461–465.
386.
Whipple [5]. WhippleRobert S., “John Yarwell or the story of a trade card”, Annals of science, vii, no. 1 (March, 1951) 62–69.
387.
Whipple collection. Anon., “The Whipple Collection of instruments and books”, Engineering, clix, nos. 4129 & 4132 (2 & 23 March 1945) 161–163, 223. See also idem, clviii, no. 4113 (10 Nov. 1944) 374.
388.
Wiedemann. WiedemannE., “Uber die Erfindung der Camera Obscura”, Verhandlungen der Deutschen physikalische Gesellschaft, xii (1910) 177–182.
389.
Winter. WinterH. J. J., “The Arabic optical MSS in the British Isles (mathematical and physical optics)”, Centaurus, v (1956) 73–88.
390.
Wise. WiseF. C., “The development of the binocular microscope”, Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, series 4, ii, no. 6 (March, 1949) 305–321.
391.
Wise et al. WiseF. C.OckendenF. E. J.SartoryP. K., “The binocular microscope. Its development, illumination and manipulation”, Monographs of the Quekett Microscopical Club No. 5 (London, 1950).
Wolfe. WolfeDavid E., “Sydenham and Locke on the limits of anatomy”, Bulletin of the history of medicine, xxxv, no. 3 (1911) 193–220.
394.
Woodruff. WoodruffLorande L., “The advent of the microscope at Yale College”, American scientist, xxxi (July 1943) 241–245.
395.
Woolf. WoolfHarry, The transits of Venus. A study of eighteenth-century science (Princetown, N.J., 1959).
396.
Zanobio [1]. ZanobioBruno, “Le osservazioni microscopiche di Felice Fontana sulla struttura dei nervi”, Physis. Rivista di storia della scienza, i, no. 4 (1959) 307–320.
397.
Zanobio [2]. ZanobioBruno, “L'immagine filamentoso-reticolare nell'anatomia microscopica del XVII al XIX secolo”, idem, ii (1960) 299–317.
398.
WerkzeitschriftZeiss. “100 years of R. Winkel GmbH”, Zeiss Werkzeitschrift, no. 26 (December, 1957). [This issue contains several articles on the life and microscopes of Rudolf Winkel of Göttingen.]