Is the History of Science Essentially Whiggish?

Butterfield Herbert , The Whig interpretation of history (London, 1931), 16.

Butterfield , op. cit (ref. 1), 92.

Koyré Alexander , Études galiléennes (Paris, 1931–39).

Brush Stephen G. , “Should the history of science be rated X?”, Science, clxxxiii (1974), 169.

Wilson Adrian Ashplant T. G. , “Whig history and present-centered history”, The historical journal, xxxi (1988), 3.

Lee Pike Kenneth , Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behaviour (The Hague, 1967).

Harris Marvin , Culture, people, nature: An introduction to general anthropology (New York, 1985), 124.

Jardine Nick , “Etics and emics (not to mention anemics and emetics) in the history of the sciences”, History of science, xlii (2004), 261–78.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 9.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 10.

Cunningham Andrew , “Getting the game right: Some plain words on the identity and invention of science”, Studies in history and philosophy of science, xix (1988), 365–89.

Jardine , op. cit. (ref. 8), 272.

Hall A. Rupert , “On Whiggism”, History of science, xxi (1983), 54.

Jardine Nick , op. cit. (ref. 8), 270.

Jardine , op. cit. (ref. 8), 273–4. See also Elias N. , The civilising process [1939], transl. by Jephcott E. (2 vols, Oxford, 1978, 1982), and The court society [1969], transl. by Jephcott E. (Oxford, 1983).

Jardine Nick , “Whigs and stories: Herbert Butterfield and the historiography of science”, History of science, xli (2003), 134.

Wilson Ashplant , op. cit. (ref. 5), 16.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 108.

Butterfield Herbert , The origins of modern science, 1300–1800 (London, 1949), 175–90.

Bueno Gustavo , “Diez lecciones acerca de la idea de progreso” ‘Ten lessons on the idea of progress’, University of Oviedo, 1994, (unpublished).

Geddes Patrick , Cities in evolution (London, 1915). Mumford Lewis , Technics and cvilization (New York, 1934).

Brush , op. cit. (ref. 4), 1167.

Thackray Arnold , “The pre-history of an academic discipline: The study of the history of science in the United States, 1891–1941”, Minerva, xviii (1988), 458.

Cunningham , op. cit. (ref. 11), 370.

Cunningham , op. cit. (ref. 11) 367–9, p. 387.

Gottfried Kurt Wilson Kenneth G. , “Science as a cultural construct”, Nature, ccclxxxvi (1997), 547.

Secord Jim , “Introduction”, The British journal for the history of science, xxvi (1993), 387–9.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 19), 191–209.

Bueno Gustavo , Teoría del cierre categorial (Oviedo, 1992). Bueno Gustavo , La función actual de la ciencia (Las Palmas, 1995).

Cf. Dilworth Craig , Scientific progress: A study concerning the nature of the relation between successive scientific theories (Dordrecht, 1981); Niiniluoto Ilkka , Is science progressive? (Dordrecht, 1984), and Niiniluoto Ilkka “Scientific progress”, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (2011).

Whewell William , Novum organon renovatum (London, 1858).

Stegmüller Wolfgang , The structure and dynamics of theories (New York, Heidelber and Berlin, 1976). Scheibe Erhard , “Conditions of progress and comparability of theories”, in Cohen R. S. (eds), Essays on memory of Imre Lakatos (D. Reidel, 1976), 547–68. Balzer Wolfgang , “On approximate reduction”, in Jonkisz and Koj, On comparing and evaluating scientific theories (Amsterdam, 2000), 153–70.

Toulmin Stephen , Human understanding (Oxford, 1972).

Popper Karl , Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (London, 1963). Popper Karl , Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach (Oxford, 1972). Niiniluoto Ilkka , Critical scientific realism (Oxford, 1999).

Kuhn Thomas , The essential tension (Chicago, 1977).

Hall Rupert , op. cit. (ref. 13), 58.

Sarton George , Introduction to the history of science (Baltimore, 1927–48).

Mayr Ernst , “When is historiography Whiggish?”, Journal of the history of ideas, li (1990), 305.

Rescher Nicholas , Scientific progress (Pittsburgh, 1978). Horgan John , The end of science: Facing the limits of science in the twilight of the scientific age (New York, 1996). Wagner-Döbler Roland , “Rescher's principle of decreasing marginal returns of scientific research”, Scientometrics, 1 (2001), 419–36.

Samelson Franz , “Whig and anti-Whig histories: And other curiosities of social psychology”, Journal of the history of the behavioral sciences. Special Issue: Re-engaging the history of social psychology, xxxvi (2000), 499–506. Raff Lamoreaux Temin , “Against Whig history”, Enterprise and society, v (2004), 2004–87.

Hull David L. , “In defense of presentism”, History and theory, xviii (1979), 3.

Hull , op. cit. (ref. 41), 4.

Jardine , op. cit. (ref. 8), 128.

Wilson Ashplant , op. cit. (ref. 5), 13. See also Jardine Nick , “The uses and abuses of anachronism in the history of science”, History of science, xxxviii (2000), 251–70.

Wilson Ashplant , op. cit. (ref. 5), 16.

Hall , op. cit. (ref. 13), 54.

Harrison Edward , “Whigs, prigs and historians of science”, Nature, cccxxix (1987), 214.

Harrison , op. cit. (ref. 47), 214.

Mayr , op. cit. (ref. 38), 304.

Mayr , op. cit. (ref. 38), 308.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 20–21.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 72.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 97.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 58.

Hall , op. cit. (ref. 13), 51.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 1), 24.

Hall , op. cit. (ref. 13), 52.

Wilson Ashplant , op. cit. (ref. 4), 11.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 19), 175–90.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 19), 180.

Butterfield , op. cit. (ref. 19), 190.