GolinskiJ. V., “Science in the Enlightenment”, History of science, xxiv (1986), 411–24. For responses, see: Thomas Broman, ” The Habermasian public sphere and ‘Science in the Enlightenment’”, History of science, xxxvi (1998), 1998–49 (esp. pp. 123–4); JonesPeter M., Industrial Enlightenment: Science, technology and culture in Birmingham and the West Midlands 1760–1820 (Manchester, 2008), 7.
2.
CantorG. N., “The historiography of ‘Georgian’ optics”, History of science, xvi (1978), 1–21.
3.
CassirerErnst, The philosophy of the Enlightenment, transl. by KoellnFritz C.PettegroveJames P. (Princeton, 1951); GayPeter, The Enlightenment: An interpretation (2 vols, London, 1970); DarntonRobert, “In search of the Enlightenment: Recent attempts to create a social history of ideas”, Journal of modern history, xliii (1971), 1971–32; idem, The business of Enlightenment: The publishing history of the Encyclopédie 1775–1800 (Cambridge, MA, 1979).
4.
Golinski, “Science in the Enlightenment” (ref. 1), 419.
5.
ClarkWilliamGolinskiJanSchafferSimon (eds), The sciences in enlightened Europe (Chicago, 1999), 3–31.
6.
FoucaultMichel, “The discourse on language”, in Foucault, The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language (New York, 1976), 215–37; idem, Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison, transl. by SheridanAlan (New York, 1979); idem, Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, ed. by GordonColin (New York, 1980).
7.
Examples include: AlderKen, The measure of all things: The seven-year odyssey that transformed the world (New York, 2002); TerrallMary, The man who flattened the earth: Maupertuis and the sciences in the Enlightenment (Chicago, 2002); RobertsLissa, “Mapping steam engines and skill in eighteenth-century Holland”, and KleinUrsula, “Apothecary shops, laboratories and chemical manufacture in eighteenth-century Germany”, in RobertsLissaSchafferSimonDearPeter (eds), The mindful hand: Inquiry and invention from the late Renaissance to early industrialisation (Amsterdam, 2007), 197–218 and 247–76; KleinUrsulaLefèvreWolfgan, Materials in eighteenth-century science: A historical ontology (Cambridge, MA, 2007).
8.
HabermasJürgen, The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, transl. by BurgerThomasLawrenceFrederick (Cambridge, MA, 1989).
9.
Broman, “Habermasian public sphere” (ref. 1), 124.
10.
On these subjects, see: StewartLarry, “Other centres of calculation, or, where the Royal Society didn't count: Commerce, coffee-houses and natural philosophy in early modern London”, The British journal for the history of science, xxxii (1999), 133–53; EllisMarkman, The coffee house: A cultural history (London, 2004); ClarkPeter, British clubs and societies 1580–1800: The origins of an associational world (Oxford, 2000); BrewerJohn, The pleasures of the imagination: English culture in the eighteenth century (New York, 1997); MunckThomas, The Enlightenment: A comparative social history 1721–1794 (London, 2000). Specific discussions of Habermas include: Broman, “Habermasian public sphere” (ref. 1); GoodmanDena, “Public sphere and private life: Toward a synthesis of current historiographical approaches to the Old Regime”, History and theory, xxxi (1992), 1992–20; WoodPaul, “Science, the universities, and the public sphere in eighteenth-century Scotland”, History of universities, xiv (1994), 1994–135.
11.
CostaShelley, “The Ladies' diary: Gender, mathematics, and civil society in early-eighteenth-century England”, Osiris, 2nd ser., xvii (2002), 49–73; WaltersAlice, “Conversation pieces: Science and politeness in eighteenth-century England”, History of science, xxxv (1997), 1997–54; GolinskiJan, “Barometers of change: Meteorological instruments as machines of enlightenment”, in ClarkGolinskiSchaffer (eds), The sciences in enlightened Europe (ref. 5), 69–93.
12.
TomaselliSylvana, “The Enlightenment debate on women”, History workshop journal, xx (1985), 101–24; SchiebingerLonda, The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science (Cambridge, MA, 1989); GoodmanDena, “Difference: An Enlightenment concept”, in BakerKeith MichaelReillPeter Hanns (eds), What's left of Enlightenment: A postmodern question (Stanford, 2001), 129–47; ScottJoan Wallach, Gender and the politics of history (New York, 1988); SmithRoger, “The language of human nature”, and Ludmilla Jordanova, “Sex and gender”, in FoxChristopherPorterRoyWoklerRobert (eds), Inventing human science: Eighteenth-century domains (Berkeley, 1995), 88–111 and 142–83.
13.
TerrallMary, “Émilie du Châtelet and the gendering of science”, History of science, xxxiii (1995), 283–310; EhrmanEsther, Mme du Châtelet: Scientist, philosopher and feminist of the Enlightenment (Leamington Spa, 1986); ZinsserJudith P., “The many representations of the Marquise du Châtelet”, in Zinsser (ed.), Men, women, and the birthing of modern science (DeKalb, IL, 2005), 48–67; Schiebinger, The mind has no sex? (ref. 12); FindlenPaula, “Science as a career in Enlightenment Italy: The strategies of Laura Bassi”, Isis, lxxxiii (1993), 1993–69; GronimSara Stidstone, “What Jane knew: A woman botanist in the eighteenth century”, Journal of women's history, xix (2007), 2007–59.
14.
MazzottiMassimo, “Newton for ladies: Gentility, gender and radical culture”, The British journal for the history of science, xxxvii (2004), 119–46; TerrallMary, “Gendered spaces, gendered audiences: Inside and outside the Paris Academy of Sciences”, Configurations, ii (1995), 1995–32; idem, “Salon, academy, and boudoir: Generation and desire in Maupertuis's science of life”, Isis, lxxxvii (1996), 1996–29.
15.
Barker-BenfieldG. J., The culture of sensibility: Sex and society in eighteenth-century Britain (Chicago, 1992); RiskinJessica, Science in the age of sensibility: The sentimental empiricists of the French Enlightenment (Chicago, 2002); BertucciPaola, “The electrical body of knowledge: Medical electricity and experimental philosophy in the mid-eighteenth century”, in BertucciPancaldiGiuliano (eds), Electric bodies: Episodes in the history of medical electricity (Bologna, 2001), 45–68.
16.
The debate is documented with commentary in: KellyMichael (ed.), Critique and power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (Cambridge, MA, 1994). See also: SchmidtJames (ed.), What is Enlightenment? Eighteenth-century answers and twentieth-century questions (Berkeley, 1996); and BakerReill (eds), What's left of Enlightenment (ref. 12).
17.
FoucaultMichel, The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, ed. by SenellartMichel, transl. by BurchellGraham (New York, 2008); idem, The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the Collège de France 1981–1982, ed. by GrosFrédéric, transl. by BurchellGraham (New York, 2005). For a selection of work inspired by Foucault, see: GoldsteinJan (ed.), Foucault and the writing of history (Oxford, 1994).
18.
Compare, in this respect, an earlier collective volume on eighteenth-century science: RousseauGeorge S.PorterRoy (eds), The ferment of knowledge: Studies in the historiography of eighteenth-century science (Cambridge, 1980). In that volume, there was relatively little attention to the Enlightenment as such, and very few contributions made any use of sociological or anthropological perspectives.
19.
LatourBruno, Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society (Cambridge, MA, 1987). For commentary, see: GolinskiJan, Making natural knowledge: Constructivism and the history of science, 2nd edn (Chicago, 2005), 27–46, 168–85; HarmanGraham, Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics (Melbourne, 2009).
20.
On the earlier period, see: CookHarold J., Matters of exchange: Commerce, medicine, and science in the Dutch Golden Age (New Haven, 2007); SmithPamela H.FindlenPaula (eds), Merchants and marvels: Commerce, science, and art in early modern Europe (New York, 2002); HarrisSteven J., “Long-distance corporations, big sciences, and the geography of knowledge”, Configurations, vi (1998), 1998–304.
21.
DelbourgoJamesDewNicholas, “Introduction: The far side of the ocean”, in DelbourgoDew (eds), Science and empire in the Atlantic world (New York, 2008), 1–28 (quotation on p. 7). see also: SecordJames A., “Halifax keynote address: Knowledge in transit”, Isis, xcv (2004), 2004–72.
22.
IliffeRob, “Science and voyages of discovery”, and Larry Stewart, “Global pillage: Science, commerce, and empire”, in PorterRoy (ed.), The Cambridge history of science, iv: Eighteenth-century science (Cambridge, 2003), 618–45 and 825–44; SmithBernard, European vision and the South Pacific (New Haven, 1985).
23.
KoernerLisbet, Linnaeus: Nature and nation (Cambridge, MA, 1999), 95–139; SparyE. C., Utopia's garden: French natural history from Old Regime to revolution (Chicago, 2000), 49–98, 117–32.
24.
MillerDavid PhilipReillPeter Hanns (eds), Visions of empire: Voyages, botany, and representations of nature (Cambridge, 1996); GascoigneJohn, Joseph Banks and the English Enlightenment (Cambridge, 1994); idem, Science in the service of empire: Joseph Banks, the British state and the uses of science in the age of revolution (Cambridge, 1998); DraytonRichard, Nature's government: Science, imperial Britain, and the ‘improvement’ of the world (New Haven, 2000).
25.
BleichmarDaniela, “Atlantic competitions: Botany in the eighteenth-century Spanish empire”, in DelbourgoDew (eds), Science and empire (ref. 21), 225–52.
26.
SlaughterThomas P., The natures of John and William Bartram (New York, 1996).
27.
SchiebingerLonda, Plants and empire: Colonial bioprospecting in the Atlantic world (Cambridge, MA, 2004); ParrishSusan Scott, American curiosity: Cultures of natural history in the colonial British Atlantic world (Chapel Hill, 2006); Gronim, “What Jane knew” (ref. 13).
28.
SchafferSimon, “Newton on the beach: The information order of Principia mathematica”, History of science, xlvii (2009), 243–76; DewNicholas, “Vers la ligne: Circulating measurements around the French Atlantic”, in DelbourgoDew (eds), Science and empire (ref. 21), 53–72.
29.
DelbourgoJames, A most amazing scene of wonders: Electricity and Enlightenment in early America (Cambridge, MA, 2006); ChaplinJoyce E., The first scientific American: Benjamin Franklin and the pursuit of genius (New York, 2006).
30.
WithersCharles W. J., Placing the Enlightenment: Thinking geographically about the Age of Reason (Chicago, 2007), 25–61; WithersCharles W. J.LivingstoneDavid N., “Introduction: On geography and Enlightenment”, in WithersLivingstone (eds), Geography and Enlightenment (Chicago, 1999), 1–31. Compare the perspective of the now-classic collection: PorterRoyTeichMikuláš (eds), The Enlightenment in national contexts (Cambridge, 1981).
31.
GavrogluKostas (ed.), The sciences in the European periphery during the Enlightenment (Dordrecht, 1999).
32.
KoernerLisbet, “Carl Linnaeus in his time and place”, in JardineN.SecordJ. A.SparyE. C. (eds), Cultures of natural history (Cambridge, 1996), 145–62.
33.
PancaldiGiuliano, Volta: Science and culture in the age of Enlightenment (Princeton, 2003).
34.
For challenges to traditional models of centre and periphery, see: Delbourgo and Dew, “Introduction” (ref. 21); Cañizares-EsguerraJorg, How to write the history of the New World: Histories, epistemologies, and identities in the eighteenth-century Atlantic world (Stanford, 2001); GroveRichard H., Green imperialism: Colonial expansion, tropical island Edens and the origins of environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge, 1995).
35.
SafierNeil, Measuring the New World: Enlightenment science in South America (Chicago, 2008); EdneyMatthew H., Mapping an empire: The geographical construction of British India, 1765–1843 (Chicago, 1997); SchafferSimon, “Golden means: Assay instruments and the geography of precision in the Guinea trade”, and RajKapil, “When human travellers become instruments: The Indo-British exploration of Central Asia in the nineteenth century”, in BourguetMarie-NoëllLicoppeChristianSibumH. Otto (eds), Instruments, travel and science: Itineraries of precision from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries (London, 2002), 20–50 and 156–88; SchafferSimon, “Instruments as cargo in the China trade”, History of science, xliv (2006), 2006–46; Terrall, The man who flattened the earth (ref. 7); Alder, The measure of all things (ref. 7).
36.
SorrensonRichard, “The ship as a scientific instrument in the eighteenth century”, Osiris, 2nd ser., xi (1996), 221–36.
37.
JohnsAdrian, The nature of the book: Print and knowledge in the making (Chicago, 1998); idem, Piracy: The intellectual property wars from Gutenberg to Gates (Chicago, 2009); SherRichard B., The Enlightenment and the book (Chicago, 2006); DarntonRobert, The forbidden best-sellers of pre-revolutionary France (New York, 1996).
38.
YeoRichard, “Genius, method, and morality: Images of Newton in Britain, 1760–1860”, Science in context, ii (1988), 257–84; FaraPatricia, Newton: The making of genius (London, 2002); JacobMargaret C.StewartLarry, Practical matter: Newton's science in the service of industry and empire 1687–1851 (Cambridge, MA, 2004); SchafferSimon, “The Asiatic Enlightenments of British astronomy”, in SchafferSimonRobertsLissaRajKapilDelbourgoJames (eds), The brokered world: Go-betweens and global intelligence 1770–1820 (Sagamore Beach, MA, 2009), 49–104.
39.
Withers, Placing the Enlightenment (ref. 30), esp. pp. 2–6.
40.
Safier, Measuring the New World (ref. 35), 123–65; GronimSara Stidstone, “Geography and persuasion: Maps in British colonial New York”, William and Mary quarterly, 3rd ser., lviii (2001), 373–402.
41.
LivingstoneDavid N., Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge (Chicago, 2003), 158.
42.
MarshallP. J.WilliamsGlyndwr, The great map of mankind: British perceptions of the world in the age of Enlightenment (London, 1982); WoklerRobert, “Anthropology and conjectural history in the Enlightenment”, and SloanPhillip, “The gaze of natural history”, in FoxPorterWokler (eds), Inventing human science (ref. 12), 31–52 and 112–51.
43.
Schiebinger, Plants and empire (ref. 27); Parrish, American curiosity (ref. 27), 215–306.
44.
“Introduction”, and DelbourgoJames, “Fugitive colours: Shamans' knowledge, chemical empire and Atlantic revolutions”, in SchafferRobertsRajDelbourgo (eds), The brokered world (ref. 38), pp. ix–xxxviii and 271–320; Schaffer, “Instruments as cargo” (ref. 35); Schiebinger, Plants and empire (ref. 27), 211–17; Parrish, American curiosity (ref. 27), 1–7.
45.
RobertsonJohn, The case for the Enlightenment: Scotland and Naples 1680–1760 (Cambridge, 2005), 1–51.
46.
Delbourgo, A most amazing scene (ref. 29); Chaplin, First scientific American (ref. 29); GronimSara S., Everyday nature: Knowledge of the natural world in colonial New York (New Brunswick, NJ, 2007); McClellanJames E.III, Colonialism and science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime (Baltimore, 1992); RajKapil, “Colonial encounters and the forging of new knowledge and national identities: Great Britain and India, 1760–1850”, Osiris, 2nd ser., xv (2000), 2000–34.
47.
On the situation in colonial North America, see: GarrettClarke, Spirit possession and popular religion: From the Camisards to the Shakers (Baltimore, 1987); LeventhalHerbert, In the shadow of the Enlightenment: Occultism and Renaissance science in eighteenth-century America (New York, 1976).
48.
RegourdFrançois, “Mesmerism in Saint Domingue: Occult knowledge and Vodou on the eve of the Haitian revolution”, in DelbourgoDew (eds), Science and empire (ref. 21), 311–32; DarntonRobert, Mesmerism and the end of the Enlightenment in France (Cambridge, MA, 1968); Riskin, Science in the age of sensibility (ref. 15), 189–225.
49.
Raj, “When human travellers become instruments” (ref. 35); Edney, Mapping an empire (ref. 35), 304–18; Safier, Measuring the New World (ref. 35), 166–99.
50.
OutramDorinda, “The Enlightenment our contemporary”, in ClarkGolinskiSchaffer (eds), The sciences in enlightened Europe (ref. 5), 32–40.