CampbellLewisGarnettWilliam, The life of James Clerk Maxwell, with selections from his correspondence and occasional writings, new edn (London, 1884), 354.
2.
LovejoyArthur O., The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea (Cambridge, MA, 1964), 242–87; BynumWilliam F., “The great chain of being after 40 years: An appraisal”, History of science, xiii (1975), 1975–28.
3.
E.g., O'ConnellJoseph, “Metrology: The creation of universality by the circulation of particulars”, Social studies of science, xxiii (1993), 129–73; WiseM. Norton (ed.), The values of precision (Princeton, 1995); PorterTheodore M., Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (Princeton, 1995); HuntBruce J., “Doing science in a global empire: Cable telegraphy and electrical physics in Victorian Britain”, in LightmanBernard (ed.), Victorian science in context (Chicago, 1997), 312–33; SchafferSimon, “Metrology, metrication, and Victorian values”, ibid., 438–74; HessVolker (ed.)., Normierung der Gesundheit: Messende Verfahren der Medizin als kulturelle Praktik um 1900 (Husum, 1997); GoodayGraeme J. N., The morals of measurement: Accuracy, irony and trust in late Victorian electrical practice (Cambridge, 2004); and (for literature reviews) HessenbruchArne, “Metrology” and ”Standardization”, in idem (ed.), Reader's guide to the history of science (London, 2000), 477–80 and 704–6.
4.
Oxford English dictionary, s.v. “series”; LittréEmile, Dictionnaire de la langue française (4 vols, Paris, 1877), s.v. “série”; GrimmJacobGrimmWilhelm, Deutsches Wörterbuch, viii (Leipzig, 1893), cols 636–55.
5.
Lovejoy, op. cit. (ref. 2), 236. On missing links in nineteenth-century culture see BeerGillian, Open fields: Science in cultural encounter (Oxford, 1996), 115–15; and CookJames W., The arts of deception: Playing with fraud in the age of Barnum (Cambridge, MA, 2001).
6.
Lovejoy, op. cit. (ref. 2), 332.
7.
FoucaultMichel, The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences (London, 1970), 150, 138, 275. See also DaudinHenri, Cuvier et Lamarck: Les classes zoologiques et l'idée de série animale (1790–1830) (Paris, 1926); JacobFrançois, The logic of life: A history of heredity (New York, 1982); and LepeniesWolf, Das Ende der Naturgeschichte (Frankfurt am Main, 1976).
8.
KielmeyerCarl Friedrich, Ueber die Verhältniße der organischen Kräfte unter einander in der Reihe der verschiedenen Organisationen, die Geseze und Folgen dieser Verhältniße (Stuttgart, 1793), 38–9; LenoirTimothy, The strategy of life: Teleology and mechanics in nineteenth-century German biology (Chicago, 1982), 43.
9.
BaerKarl Ernst v., “Beiträge zur Kenntniss der niedern Thiere. VII. Die Verwandtschafts-Verhältnisse unter den niedern Thierformen”, Verhandlungen der Kaiserlichen Leopoldinisch-Carolinischen Akademie der Naturforscher, xiii (1827), 731–62, p. 740, translated according to “Fragments relating to philosophical zoology: Selected from the works of K. E. von Baer”, in Scientific memoirs, selected from the transactions of foreign academies of science and from foreign journals: Natural history, ed. by HenfreyArthurHuxleyThomas Henry (London, 1853), 176–238, p. 179; Foucault, op. cit. (ref. 7), 271.
10.
AppelToby A., “Henri de Blainville and the animal series: A nineteenth-century chain of being”, Journal of the history of biology, xiii (1980), 291–319.
11.
“Observations on the nature and importance of geology”, Edinburgh new philosophical journal, i (1826), 292–302, p. 300. The author of this article is uncertain, but it is certainly not Robert Edmond Grant and may even be Jameson himself: SecordJames A., “Edinburgh Lamarckians: Robert Jameson and Robert E. Grant”, Journal of the history of biology, xxiv (1991), 1991–18; and, for discussion of contemporary ‘ultraserialism’, DesmondAdrian, The politics of evolution: Morphology, medicine and reform in radical London (Chicago, 1989), 5 n. 11, 45, 311.
12.
Desmond, op. cit. (ref. 11), 263–4.
13.
HerschelWilliam, “Astronomical observations relating to the sidereal part of the heavens”, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, civ (1814), 248–84, p. 248.
14.
HerschelJohn, “Account of some observations made with a 20-feet reflecting telescope”, Memoirs of the Astronomical Society, ii (1826), 459–97, p. 488; [NicholJohn Pringle], “State of discovery and speculation concerning the nebulae”, Westminster review, xxv (1836), 1836–409, pp. 404–5; HoskinMichael, “John Herschel's cosmology”, Journal for the history of astronomy, xviii (1987), 1987–34, p. 8; BrushStephen G., Nebulous Earth: The origin of the solar system and the core of the Earth from Laplace to Jeffreys (Cambridge, 1996), 40–2.
15.
SchafferSimon, “The nebular hypothesis and the science of progress”, in MooreJames R. (ed.), History, humanity and evolution: Essays for John C. Greene (Cambridge, 1989), 131–64, pp. 150–1.
16.
BarsantiGiulio, La scala, la mappa, l'albero: Immagini e classificazioni della natura tra Sei e Ottocento (Florence, 1992).
17.
On the transformation of maps, see LaudanRachel, From mineralogy to geology: The foundations of a science, 1650–1830 (Chicago, 1987), 168–9; RudwickMartin J. S., Bursting the limits of time: The reconstruction of geohistory in the age of revolution (Chicago, 2005); idem, “The emergence of a visual language for geological science, 1760–1840”, History of science, xiv (1976), 1976–95.
18.
Fischer-HombergerEsther, Medizin vor Gericht: Gerichtsmedizin von der Renaissance bis zur Aufklärung (Bern, 1983), 249–50; DudenBarbara, “Zwischen ‘wahrem Wissen’ und Prophetie: Konzeptionen des Ungeborenen”, in DudenJürgen SchlumbohmVeitPatrice (eds), Geschichte des Ungeborenen: Zur Erfahrungs- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte der Schwangerschaft, 17.–20. Jahrhundert (Göttingen, 2002), 11–48; BuklijasTatjanaHopwoodNick, “Development”, in Making visible embryos (2008; http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/visibleembryos/s2.html). see further HagnerMichael, “Enlightened monsters”, in ClarkWilliamGolinskiJanSchafferSimon (eds), The sciences in enlightened Europe (Chicago, 1999), 175–217; WellmannJanina, “Keine Ikone der Entwicklung: Die Icones embryonum humanorum von Samuel Thomas Soemmerring”, in SchneiderUlrich Johannes (ed.) Kulturen des Wissens im 18. Jahrhundert (Göttingen, 2008), 585–94; and idem, “Die Metamorphose der Bilder: Die Verwandlung der Insekten und ihre Darstellung vom Ende des 17. bis zum Anfang des 19. Jahrhunderts”, N. T. M., xvi (2008), 2008–211.
19.
GoodingDavid, “Experiment and concept formation in electromagnetic science and technology in England in the 1820s”, History and technology, ii (1985), 151–76; FaradayMichael, Experimental researches in electricity (London, 1839), pp. iii–iv; MorusIwan, Frankenstein's children: Electricity, exhibition and experiment in early nineteenth-century London (Princeton, 1998), 23–41.
20.
HopwoodNick, “Visual standards and disciplinary change: Normal plates, tables and stages in embryology”, History of science, xliii (2005), 239–303.
21.
Gowan Dawson is currently completing work on forms of publication in Victorian palaeontology. On Cuvier and Laplace, see OutramDorinda, Georges Cuvier: Vocation, science and authority in post-Revolutionary France (Manchester, 1984); and Charles Coulston Gillispie (with the collaboration of FoxRobertGrattan-GuinnessIvor), Pierre-Simon Laplace, 1749–1827: A life in exact science (Princeton, 1997). For serial publication of novels see HughesLinda K.LundMichael, The Victorian serial (Charlottesville, VA, 1991); PooveyMary, Uneven developments: The ideological work of gender in mid-Victorian England (Chicago, 1988); FeltesNorman N., Modes of production of Victorian novels (Chicago, 1986); and several of the essays in JordanJohn O.PattenRobert L. (eds), Literature in the marketplace: Nineteenth-century British publishing and reading practices (Cambridge, 1995).
22.
HerschelJohn, “Sound”, Encyclopaedia metropolitana, iv (London, 1830), 763–824; and CannonSusan Faye, Science in culture: The early Victorian period (New York, 1978), 180–1. On the debates about transmutation, see CorsiPietro, “The importance of French transformist ideas for the second volume of Lyell's Principles of geology”, The British journal for the history of science, xi (1978), 1978–44, pp. 227–9.
23.
On periodicals, see CroslandMaurice, In the shadow of Lavoisier: The Annales de chimie and the establishment of a new science (Oxford, 1994); BrockW. H., “The development of commercial science journals in Victorian Britain”, in MeadowsA. J. (ed.), Development of science publishing in Europe (Amsterdam, 1980), 95–122; BromanThomas H., “Periodical literature”, in Frasca-SpadaMarinaJardineNick (eds), Books and the sciences in history (Cambridge, 2000), 225–38; SecordJames A., “Science, technology and mathematics”, in McKitterickDavid (ed.) The Cambridge history of the book in Britain, vi: 1830–1914 (Cambridge, 2009), 443–74, pp. 451–9; and BynumW. F.LockStephenPorterRoy (eds), Medical journals and medical knowledge: Historical essays (London, 1992). The significance of general periodicals for the sciences is brought out in the work of the SciPer Project at Leeds and Sheffield, especially DawsonGowanNoakesRichardTophamJonathan R., “Introduction” to CantorGeoffrey (eds), Science in the nineteenth-century periodical: Reading the magazine of nature (Cambridge, 2004), 1–34.
24.
SchafferSimon, “Scientific discoveries and the end of natural philosophy”, Social studies of science, xvi (1986), 387–420. On the ‘spirit of the age’, see ChandlerJames, England in 1819: The politics of literary culture and the case of Romantic historicism (Chicago, 1998).
25.
SecordJames A., “How scientific conversation became shop talk”, in FyfeAileenLightmanBernard (eds), Science in the marketplace: Nineteenth-century sites and experiences (Chicago, 2007), 23–59. For aspects of the French case, Dorinda Outram, “Before objectivity: Wives, patronage, and cultural reproduction in early nineteenth-century French science”, in Abir-AmPnina G.OutramDorinda (eds), Uneasy careers and intimate lives: Women in science, 1789–1979 (New Brunswick, NJ, 1987), 1–30.
26.
These issues have recently been extensively discussed, e.g., in BaylyC. A., The birth of the modern world, 1780–1914 (Oxford, 2004); WinseckDwayne R.PikeRobert M., Communication and empire: Media, markets, and globalization, 1860–1930 (Durham, NC, 2007); and the focus section edited by SivasundaramSujit, “Global histories of science”, Isis, ci (2010), 2010–158.
27.
GreenhalghPaul, Ephemeral vistas: The expositions universelles, great exhibitions and world's fairs, 1851–1939 (Manchester, 1991); RydellRobert W.GwinnNancy (eds), Fair representations: World's fairs and the modern world (Amsterdam, 1994); GeorgelChantal (ed.), La jeunesse des musées: Les musées de France au XIXe siècle (Paris, 1994); FuchsEckhardt (ed.), Weltausstellungen im 19. Jahrhundert (Leipzig, 1999); YanniCarla, Nature 's museums: Victorian science and the architecture of display (London, 1999).
28.
For Salter: SecordJames A., “The Geological Survey of Great Britain as a research school, 1839–1855”, History of science, xxiv (1986), 223–75, p. 260; for Neumayr: RudwickMartin J. S., The meaning of fossils: Episodes in the history of palaeontology (Chicago, 1985), 255.
29.
Rudwick, op. cit. (ref. 28), 252–4; DesmondAdrian, Huxley: From devil's disciple to evolution's high priest (London, 1998), 471–3; ClarkConstance Areson, God — Or gorilla: Images of evolution in the jazz age (Baltimore, 2008).
30.
HopwoodNick, “Pictures of evolution and charges of fraud: Ernst Haeckel's embryological illustrations”, Isis, xcvii (2006), 260–301; VossJulia, Darwins Bilder: Ansichten der Evolutionstheorie 1837–1874 (Frankfurt am Main, 2007), 190–7.
31.
E.g., TheunissenBert, Eugène Dubois and the ape-man from Java: The history of the first missing link and its discoverer (Dordrecht, 1989).
DavisE. A.FalconerI. J., J. J. Thomson and the discovery of the electron (London, 1997), 47–52, 73–6.
34.
EverdellWilliam R., The first moderns: Profiles in the origins of twentieth-century thought (Chicago, 1997), 75–6.
35.
van KeurenDavid K., “Museums and ideology: Augustus Pitt-Rivers, anthropological museums and social change in later Victorian Britain”, in BrantlingerPatrick (ed.) Energy and entropy: Science and culture in Victorian Britain (Bloomington, 1989), 270–88, p. 277; FoxA. Lane [Pitt Rivers], “On the principles of classification adopted in the arrangement of his anthropological collection”, Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, iv (1874), 1874–16, p. 3; ChapmanWilliam Ryan, “Arranging ethnology: A. H. L. F. Pitt Rivers and the typological tradition”, in StockingGeorge W.Jr (ed.), Objects and others: Essays on museums and material culture (Madison, 1985), 15–48, p. 41.
36.
ZimmermanAndrew, Anthropology and antihumanism in Imperial Germany (Chicago, 2001), 172–98; PennyH. Glenn, Objects of culture: Ethnology and ethnographic museums in Imperial Germany (Chapel Hill, 2002).
37.
See also Clark, God — Or gorilla (ref. 29).
38.
ChristieJ. R. R.GolinskiJ. V., “The spreading of the word: New directions in the historiography of chemistry, 1600–1800”, History of science, xx (1982), 235–66; CohenBenjamin R., “The element of the table: Visual discourse and the preperiodic representation of chemical classification”, Configurations, xii (2004), 2004–75.
39.
AmpèreAndré-Marie, “Essay towards a natural classification of simple bodies”, Philosophical magazine, xlvii (1816), 438–46, p. 444. For chemists and the chain of being see KnightDavid M., The transcendental part of chemistry (Folkestone, 1978), 248–54.
40.
GordinMichael D., A well-ordered thing: Dmitrii Mendeleev and the shadow of the periodic table (New York, 2004), 26.
41.
ScerriEric R., The periodic table: Its story and its significance (Oxford, 2007), 251.
42.
EliotSimon, Some patterns and trends in British publishing, 1800–1919 (London, 1994); MageeGary Bryan, Productivity and performance in the paper industry: Labour, capital, and technology in Britain and America, 1860–1914 (Cambridge, 1997).
43.
Müller-WilleStaffan, “Early Mendelism and the subversion of taxonomy: Epistemological obstacles as institutions”, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, xxxvi (2005), 465–87; RheinbergerHans-JörgMüller-Wille, Vererbung: Geschichte und Kultur eines biologischen Konzepts (Frankfurt am Main, 2009), 160–5, 175–81.
44.
FoucaultMichel, Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978, ed. by SenellartMichel (Basingstoke, 2007), 315.
45.
HackingIan, The taming of chance (Cambridge, 1990), 35–6, 123; PorterTheodore M., The rise of statistical thinking, 1820–1900 (Princeton, 1986), 86.
46.
LyellCharles, Principles of geology (London, 1833), iii, 31; RudwickM. J. S., “Charles Lyell's dream of a statistical palaeontology”, Palaeontology, xxi (1978), 1978–44; and idem, “Transposed concepts from the human sciences in the early work of Charles Lyell”, in JordanovaLudmillaPorterRoy (eds), Images of the Earth: Essays in the history of the environmental sciences (Chalfont St Giles, 1979), 67–83.
47.
Secord, op. cit. (ref. 28), 250; idem, Controversy in Victorian geology: The Cambrian—Silurian dispute (Princeton, 1986), 243.
48.
PerkinsMaureen, Visions of the future: Almanacs, time, and cultural change, 1775–1870 (Oxford, 1996), chap. 6; LevittTheresa, The shadow of enlightenment: Optical and political transparency in France, 1789–1848 (Oxford, 2009), 91–8, 101.
49.
AndersonKatharine, Predicting the weather: Victorians and the science of meteorology (Chicago, 2005), 58–63.
50.
Ibid., 207–8.
51.
UreAndrew, The philosophy of manufactures; or, an exposition of the scientific, moral and commercial economy of the factory system of Great Britain (London, 1835), 13; FarrarW. V., ” andrew Ure and the philosophy of manufactures”, Notes and records of the Royal Society, xxvii (1973), 1973–324; BergMaxine, The machinery question and the making of political economy, 1815–1848 (Cambridge, 1980), 199.
52.
Berg, op. cit. (ref. 51), 282, cites a socialist journal of 1836; Kufahl (1844) is cited in BiernackiRichard, The fabrication of labor: Germany and Britain, 1640–1914 (Berkeley, 1997), 139. For rival systems of serial factory layouts see MarkusThomas A., Buildings and power: Freedom and control in the origin of modern building types (London, 1993), 261–70.
53.
MarxKarl, Capital: A critique of political economy, i (London, 1976), 463–5, 500–2, 544–5. GiedionCompare Siegfried, Mechanization takes command: A contribution to anonymous history (New York, 1969), 99–100; HughesThomas P., “The order of the technological world”, History of technology, v (1980), 1–16, pp. 5–7; and PanzieriRaniero, “The capitalist use of machinery: Marx versus the ‘objectivists’”, in SlaterPhil (ed.) Outlines of a critique of technology (London, 1980), 44–68.
54.
BabbageCharles, The ninth Bridgewater treatise: A fragment, 2nd edn (London, 1838), 41–42, 66; idem, Passages from the life of a philosopher (London, 1864), 387; SchafferSimon, “Babbage's intelligence: Calculating engines and the factory system”, Critical inquiry, xxi (1994), 1994–27; DolanBrian P., “Representing novelty: BabbageCharles, Charles Lyell, and experiments in early Victorian geology”, History of science, xxxvi (1998), 1998–327.
55.
For serial production and artful variation in commodity culture see BriggsAsa, Victorian things (Harmondsworth, 1990), 20–4, 370–4; RichardsThomas, The commodity culture of Victorian England: Advertising and spectacle, 1851–1914 (Stanford, 1990); KriegelLara, Grand designs: Labor, empire and the museum in Victorian culture (Durham, NC, 2007). These debates about standards and adaptations in serial production had major scientific and moral aspects. Natural theology often used the minute adaptations of natural entities to argue for their divine origin. But in the 1870s, for example, Clerk Maxwell and his colleagues used magazines, encyclopaedia articles and sermons to debate whether molecules' uniformity made them resemble “manufactured articles” like mass-produced screws or shoes, and whether this uniformity was better evidence of molecules' divine manufacture than was ingenious adaptation. See CampbellGarnett, op. cit. (ref. 1), 300–2; TheermanPaul, “James Clerk Maxwell and religion”, American journal of physics, liv (1986), 1986–17.
56.
Giedion, op. cit. (ref. 53), 17–30, 101–13; SternbergerDolf, Panorama of the nineteenth century (New York, 1977), 39–40; SchivelbuschWolfgang, The railway journey: The industrialization of time and space in the 19th century (Berkeley, 1986), 61–4. For panoramic vision in nineteenth-century sciences, see BiggCharlotte, “The panorama, or la nature à coup d'oeil”, in FiorentiniErna (ed.) Observing nature — Representing experience: The osmotic dynamics of Romanticism, 1800–1850 (Berlin, 2007), 73–95.
57.
SeiberlingGrace, Monet's series (New York, 1981), 29–35.
58.
RabinbachAnson, The human motor: Energy, fatigue and the origins of modernity (Berkeley, 1992), 103, 116. BrainCompare Robert M., “Representation on the line: Graphic recording instruments and scientific modernism”, in ClarkBruceHendersonLinda Dalrymple (eds), From energy to information: Representation in science and technology, art, and literature (Stanford, 2002), 155–77.