EiseleyLoren, “Review: The triumph of the Darwinian method by Michael T. Ghiselin”, American anthropologist, lxxii (1970), 957–9; GhiselinMichael T., The triumph of the Darwinian method (Los Angeles, 1969).
2.
NollMark A., “Foreword to the US edition”, in MooreJames R., The Darwin legend: Are the reports of his deathbed conversion true? (Grand Rapids, 1994), p. ix. For further on the early history of the Darwin Industry and the Darwin correspondence project see for example RuseMichael, “The Darwin Industry: A critical evaluation”, History of science, xii (1974), 1974–58; BurkhardtFrederick, “Editing Darwin”, Proceeding of the American Philosophical Society, cxxx (1986), 1986–73; MontgomeryWilliam, “Editing the Darwin correspondence: A quantitative perspective”, The British journal for the history of science, xx (1987), 1987–27; MooreJames R., “Essay review: Darwin's genesis and revelations”, Isis, lxxvi (1985), 1985–80; BurkhardtFrederick (eds), The correspondence of Charles Darwin (17 vols, Cambridge, 1985–2009); BurkhardtFrederick (eds), A calendar of the correspondence of Charles Darwin, 1821–1882 (Cambridge, 1994), “Introduction”, 1–9.
3.
For overviews of the history of science community's industrious Darwin production see WassersugRichard J.RoseMichael R., “A reader's guide and retrospective to the 1982 Darwin centennial”, The quarterly review of biology, lix (1984), 417–37; KohnDavid (ed.), The Darwinian heritage (Princeton, 1986); LenoirTimothy, “Essay review: The Darwin Industry”, Journal of the history of biology, xx (1987), 1987–30; RuseMichael, “The Darwin Industry: A guide”, Victorian studies, xxxix (1996), 1996–35; RuseMichael, “Darwinian struggles: But is there progress?”, History of science, xlvii (2009), 2009–30; BowlerPeter J., “The eclipse of pseudo-Darwinism? Reflections on some recent developments in Darwin studies”, History of science, xlvii (2009), 2009–43. James R. Moore provides a personal history of the Darwin industry from within in “Metabiographical reflections on Darwin” in ShortlandMichaelYeoRichard (eds), Telling lives in science: Essays on scientific biography (Cambridge, 1996), 267–81.
4.
DesmondAdrianMooreJames R., Darwin: The life of a tormented evolutionist (London, 1991); BowlerPeter, Charles Darwin: The man and his influence (Cambridge, 1996); BrowneJanet, Charles Darwin, voyaging (London, 1995) and Charles Darwin: The power of place (London, 2003).
5.
RuseMichael, “Will the real Charles Darwin please stand up?”, The quarterly review of biology, lxviii (1993), 225–31.
6.
LightmanBernard, “The many lives of Charles Darwin”, lecture delivered at the Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, 20 April 2009. see also BrowneJanet, “Making Darwin: Biography and the changing representation of Charles Darwin”, The journal of interdisciplinary history, xl (2010), 347–73; BrowneJanet, “Darwin as a celebrity”, Science in context, xvi (2003), 2003–94; BrowneJanet, “Commemorating Darwin”, The British journal for the history of science, xxxviii (2005), 2005–74; BrowneJanet, “Looking at Darwin: Portraits and the making of an icon”, Isis, c (2009), 2009–70; RichmondMarsha L., “The 1909 Darwin celebration: Reexamining evolution in the light of Mendel, mutation, and meiosis”, Isis, xcvii (2006), 2006–84; VassilikiBetty Smocovitis, “The 1959 Darwin centennial celebration in America”, Osiris, n.s., xiv (1999), 1999–323; MooreJames R., “Charles Darwin lies in Westminster Abbey”, in BerryR. J. (ed.), Charles Darwin: A commemoration (London 1982), 97–113; KjærgaardPeter C., “Forging and evolutionary icon: Danes and the Darwin Memorial”, in GlickThomas F.ShafferElinorEngelsEve—Marie (eds), Darwinism in Europe: Science, culture, religion (Cambridge, 2010).
7.
One example from two of the most prolific writers in the scholarly Darwin Industry is the very different narratives and explanations from Darwin's secret cause to Darwin's sacred cause we find in Desmond and Moore's Darwin (ref. 4) and their most recent book Darwin's sacred cause: Race, slavery and the quest for human origins (London, 2009).
8.
OldroydDavid, “Darwin's geology: The end of the Darwin Industry?”, Metascience, xvi (2007), 25–31. Sandra Herbert, Charles Darwin, geologist (Ithaca, 2005).
9.
See for example DesmondMoore, Darwin's sacred cause (ref. 7); HodgeJonathanRadickGregory (eds), The Cambridge companion to Darwin, 2nd edn (Cambridge2009); RuseMichaelRichardsRobert J. (eds), The Cambridge companion to the Origin of Species (Cambridge2008); HodgeJonathan, Before and after Darwin: Origins, species, cosmogonies, and ontologies (Aldershot, 2008); HodgeJonathan, Darwin studies: A theorist and his theories in their contexts (Aldershot, 2009); LightmanBernard, Evolutionary naturalism in Victorian Britain: The ‘Darwinians’ and their critics (Aldershot, 2009); SecordJames A., Charles Darwin: Evolutionary writings including the autobiographies (Oxford, 2008); van WyheJohn (ed.), Charles Darwin's shorter publications, 1829–1883 (Cambridge, 2009); ChancellorGordonvan WyheJohn (eds), Charles Darwin's notebooks from the voyage of the ‘Beagle’ (Cambridge, 2009); and the fine series of small correspondence volumes, Origins: Selected letters of Charles Darwin 1822–1859, Evolution: Selected letters of Charles Darwin 1860–1870, and Charles Darwin: The Beagle letters, ed. by BurkhardtFrederickEvensSamanthaPearnAlison (Cambridge, 2008). The Darwin anniversary year has been marked in several history of science journals. See, for example, Paul Farber, “Editorial: Darwin Year”, Journal of the history of biology, xlii (2009), 2009–2; Iwan Morus's “Editorial” in History of science, xlvii (2009), 2009–71; SecordJames A., “Focus: Darwin as a cultural icon. Introduction”, Isis, c (2009), 2009–41. The most substantial post-2009 report on the Darwin anniversary year so far is Steven Shapin, “The Darwin show”, London review of books, xxxii (2010), 2010–9.
10.
RybczynskiNataliaDawsonMary R.TedfordRichard H., “A semi-aquatic Arctic mammalian carnivore from the miocene epoch and origin of pinnipedia”, Nature, cdlviii (2009), 1021–4, p. 1022. DarwinCharles, The origin of species by means of natural selection or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 6th edn (London, 1872), 180. Puijila darwini's website is hosted by the Canadian Museum of Nature: http://nature.ca/puijila (accessed 24 November 2009).
11.
FranzenJens L., “Complete primate skeleton from the middle eocene of Messel in Germany: Morphology and paleobiology”, PLoS ONE, iv (2009), e5723, 1–27 (http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0005723; accessed 24 November 2009), 5; TudgeColin, The link: Uncovering ourearliestancestor (London, 2009). Darwinius masillae's interactive website is found at http://revealingthelink.com (accessed 24 November 2009). The campaign was criticized by a number of people both within the media and the sciences. Among the negative reactions in the scientific community was a letter to Nature signed by no fewer than eleven prominent scientists in the field; see SimonsElwyn L., “Outrage at high price paid for a fossil”, Nature, cdlx (2009), 456. The study challenging Darwinius marsillae's phylogenetic place in the human lineage was also published in Nature; see SeiffertErik R., “Convergent evolution of anthropoid-like adaptations in eocene adapiform primates”, Nature, cdlxi (2009), 2009–21.
12.
KohlmannBertSolisAngel, “New species of ateuchus and canthidium (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae Scarabaeinae) from Costa Rica”, Zootaxa, mmccxix (2009), 31–7.
For Darwin's original discussion in the Origin of various transitional stages including those in the fossil record see On the origin of species, 1st edn (London, 1859), chaps. 6 and 14. In “The undead Darwin: Iconic narrative, scientific controversy and the history of science”, History of science, xlvii (2009), 445–57, Amanda Rees analyses primatologists' use of Darwin in discussions about infanticide in non-human primates. The pragmatic and purpose oriented use of Darwin among palaeontologists in 2009 to generate publicity and make authority claims is very similar to what Rees has found among primatologists.
15.
These examples demonstrate that the idea of “missing links” is still very much part of the scientific discourse, certainly for the discourse of science with active participation of prominent scientists in contemporary palaeontology. The idea of “missing links” has a long history preceding Darwin's publication of the Origin. This is a huge topic and cannot be dealt with adequately here. For a brief introduction to the use of “missing links” in cartoons, as an example of how the concept appears in a popular context, see Constance Areson Clark's recent article, “‘You are here’: Missing links, chains of being, and the language of cartoons”, Isis, c (2009), 571–89.
16.
BrowneJanet, “Darwin as a celebrity” (ref. 6). see also BrowneJanet, “Darwin in caricature: A study in the popularisation and dissemination of evolution”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, cxlv (2001), 496–509.
17.
In his now classic study of the Galápagos Finch legend Frank Sulloway has led the way in the Darwin Industry to trace and dispel the biggest and most harmful myths. See his “Darwin and his finches: The evolution of a legend”, Journal of the history of biology, xv (1982), 1–53, and “The Beagle collections of Darwin's finches”, Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) zoology series, xliii (1982), 1982–94. ColpRalphJr, has effectively demolished the myth that Karl Marx wanted to dedicate Das Kapital to Darwin in “The myth of the Darwin—Marx letter”, History of political economy, xiv (1982), 1982–82; James Moore has taken on another of the most persisting Darwin myths, his alleged deathbed conversion to Christianity in The Darwin legend: Are the reports of his deathbed conversion true? (ref. 2). John van Wyhe has challenged the prevailing ideas of ‘Darwin's delay’ in “Mind the gap: Did Darwin avoid publishing his theory for many years?”, Notes and records of the Royal Society, lxi (2007), 2007–205. It remains one of the most important tasks of Darwin and evolution scholars to dispel the many and widespread myths and misconceptions that have thrived and mushroomed during the anniversary year. We find them everywhere in the public sphere, but, in fact, the most damaging are the ones growing out of the scholarly community perpetuating now orthodox and authoritative narratives rarely challenged or checked, in comfortable consensus on standard details of the Darwin story. Also here there is indeed a need for a critical look at the products of the Darwin Industry. Younger scholars should be encouraged to take on the challenge and be commended for so doing.
18.
The Ministry for Science and Technology in Brazil, for example, organized a Darwin trail, Caminhos de Darwin, Rio de Janeiro 1832–2008, combining tourism, outreach and science projects (see www.casadaciencia.ufrj.br/caminhosdedarwin; accessed 24 November 2009).
19.
See for example the study of public knowledge and understanding of Darwin and evolution in Argentina, China, Egypt, Great Britain, India, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, Spain and USA commissioned by the British Council and publicized in June 2009 (IPSOS MORI Poll J09–007003).
20.
For the reception of Darwin around the world see for example GlickThomas F. (ed.), The comparative reception of Darwinism (Austin, 1972); EngelsEve-Marie (ed.), Die Rezeption von Evolutionstheorien im 19. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt, 1995); BrömerRainerHossfeldUweRupkeNicolaas A. (eds), Evolutionsbiologie von Darwin bis heute (Berlin, 2000); GlickThomas F.Puig-SamperMiguel AngelRuizR. (eds), The reception of Darwinism in the Iberian world: Spain, Spanish America and Brazil (New York, 2001); EngelsEve-MarieGlickThomas, The reception of Charles Darwin in Europe (2 vols, London, 2008).
21.
There are numerous accounts of the famous meeting. see for example JamesFrank A. J. L., “An ‘open clash between science and the Church’?Wilberforce, Huxley and Hooker on Darwin at the British Association, Oxford, 1860”, in KnightDavid M.EddyMatthew D. (eds), Science and beliefs: From natural philosophy to natural science, 1700–1900 (Aldershot, 2005), 171–94, and JensenJ. Vernon, “Return to the Wilberforce—Huxley debate”, The British journal for the history of science, xxi (1988), 1988–79.
22.
See for example SimonsEric, Darwin slept here: Discovery, adventure and swimming iguanas in Charles Darwin's South America (Woodstock, 2009); DixonMikeRadickGregory, Darwin in Ilkley (Bromscombe Port, 2009); van WyheJohn, Darwin in Cambridge (Cambridge 2009); and NicholasF. W.NicholasJ. M., Charles Darwin in Australia (Cambridge, 2008).
For an evolutionary account of hummingbirds and island flora and fauna see AltshulerDouglas L.ClarkChristopher James, “Darwin's hummingbirds”, Science, ccc (2003), 588–9.
DonaldDianaMunroJane (eds), Endless forms: Charles Darwin, natural science and the visual arts (New Haven, 2009); KortPamelaHolleinMox (eds), Darwin: Art and the search for origins (Cologne, 2009). For the new trend in studying Darwin and visual culture see also SmithJonathan, Charles Darwin and Victorian visual cultura (Cambridge, 2009); VossJulia, Darwin's Bilder: Ansichten der Evolutionstheorie 1827 bis 1874 (Frankfurt, 2007); LarsonBarbaraBrauerFae (eds), The art of evolution: Darwin, Darwinisms, and visual cultura (Lebanon, NH, 2009).
28.
See for example BallouEmily, The Darwin poems (Crawley, 2009); PadelRuth, Darwin: A life in poems (London, 2009); MeyerCarolyn, The true adventures of Charley Darwin (Boston, 2009); BaxterCraig, Re:design (http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/content/view/89/74, accessed 24 November 2009); RohdeJokum, Darwins Testamente (The Royal Danish Theatre, 2008); Hotel Pro Forma, Tomorrow, in a year (The Royal Danish Theatre, 2009); The Low Anthem, Oh my God, Charlie Darwin (Bella Union, 2009); various artists, The Darwin song Project (Shrewsbury Song Festival, 2009); www.cammusic.co.uk (accessed 24 November 2009). For a study of the use of Darwin in musical traditions see SmocovitisVassiliki Betty, “Singing his praises: Darwin and his theory in song and musical production”, Isis, c (2009), 2009–614.
29.
Creation: Darwin the true story, directed by Jon Amiel (2009); MMaster and commander: The far side of the world, directed by Peter Weir (2003). See also KeynesRandall, Annie's box: Charles Darwin, his daughter and human evolution (London, 2002). The book was reprinted in 2009 under the title Creation: The true story of Charles DarwinM, to accompany the film. For a critical reading of Creation see Iwan Morus's “Editorial” (ref. 9).
See van WyheJohn“Darwin online and the evolution of the Darwin industry”, History of science, xlvii (2009), 459–73.
32.
See BowlerPeterBrowneJanetHerbertSandra, “The perils of publicity”, Newsletter of the History of Science Society, no. 38 (2009), 24. The voyage that shook the world was directed by Steve Murray for Creation Ministries International (www.creation.com) and released in 2009. Expelled: No intelligence allowed was directed by Nathan Frankowski and released 18 April 2008.
33.
KjærgaardPeter C., “Western front”, New humanist, cxxiii (2008), 39–42.
34.
See for example MillerJon D.ScottEugenieOkamotoShinji, “Public acceptance of evolution”, Science, cccxiii (2006), 765–6; and “Supporting online material for public acceptance of evolution”, www.sciencemag.org (published 18 August 2006), 1–13.
35.
Personal communication from the editor in charge at EkstraBladet.
BrookeJohn H.CantorGeoffrey, Reconstructing nature: The engagement of science and religion (Edinburgh1998); SecordJames A., Victorian sensation: The extraordinary publication, reception and secret authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (Chicago 2001); and SecordJames A., “Knowledge in transit”, Isis, xcv (2004), 2004–72.
38.
EdgertonDavid, The shock of the old: Technology and global history since 1900 (London, 2006).