On Robin, see RobinHenri, L'almanach illustré de Cagliostro 1864. Histoire de spectres vivants et impalpables. Secrets de la physique amusante dévoilés par M. Robin (Paris, 1864); idem, L'almanach illustré de Cagliostro 1865. Histoire de la science au theatre. L'astronomie populaire. Les spectres et les secrets de la physique amusante dévoilée par M. Robin (Paris, 1865); DifMax, Histoire illustrée de la prestidigitation (Paris, 1986), 83–88; MannoniLaurent, “La lanterne magique du boulevard du crime: Henri Robin, fantasmagore et magicien”, 1895: Bulletin de l'Association Française de Recherche sur l'Histoire du Cinema, June 1994, 5–26; idem, Le grand art de la lumière et de l'ombre: Archéologie du cinema (Paris, 1995), 235–9; and MoynetGeorges, Trucs et décors: Explication raisonnée de tous les moyens employés pour produire les illusions théâtrales (Geneva, 1973), 276–81.
2.
On the history of nineteenth-century magic and magicians, see, for example, BoothMichael R., Victorian spectacular theatre, 1850–1910 (London, 1981); CookJames W., The arts of deception: Playing with fraud in the age of Barnum (Cambridge, MA, 2001); DuringSimon, Modern enchantments: The cultural power of secular magic (Cambridge, MA, 2002); and LambGeoffrey, Victorian magic (London, 1976). History of conjuring written by magicians themselves can also be very useful. In particular, see Dif, op. cit. (ref. 1); MilbourneChristoper, The illustrated history of magic (New York, 1973); and SteinmeyerJim, Hiding the elephant: How magicians invented the impossible and learned to disappear (New York, 2003).
3.
IsherwoodRobert, “Entertainment in the Parisian fairs in the eighteenth century”, The journal of modern history, liii (1981), 24–48, p. 47; and idem, Farce and fantasy: Popular entertainment in eighteenth-century Paris (New York, 1986), 199, 251.
4.
FiguierLouis, Les merveilles de la science ou description populaire des inventions modernes (4 vols, Paris, 1867–91); idem, Les mystères de la science (2 vols, Paris, 1892–93); and FlammarionCamille, Les curiosités de la science (Paris, 1901).
5.
BrunetBrigitte, Le théâtre de boulevard (Paris, 2004), 4–13. On the importance of the theatre in the lives of Parisians, see WeberEugen, France, fin de siècle (Cambridge, MA, 1986), 59–176.
6.
See, for example, de VaulabelleA. and HémardinquerCh., La science au théatre: Étude sur les procédées scientifiques en usage dans le théatre moderne (Paris, 1908), 124–36. On the panoramas and dioramas in Paris at the time, see SchwartzVanessa, Spectacular realities: Early mass culture in fin-de-siècle Paris (Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1999), 149–76.
7.
See, for example, LachapelleSofie, “From the stage to the laboratory: Magicians, psychologists, and the science of illusion”, Journal of the history of behavioral sciences, xliv (2008), 319–34; and MorusIwan Rhys, “Seeing and believing science”, Isis, xcvii (2006), 2006–10.
8.
Morus, op. cit. (ref. 7), 104.
9.
On French occultism, see HarveyDavid Allen, Beyond enlightenment: Occultism and politics in modern France (Paris, 2005); and MonroeJohn Warne, Laboratories of faith: Mesmerism, spiritism, and occultism in modern France (Ithaca, 2008). On British occultism, see OwenAlex, The place of enchantment: British occultism and the culture of the modern (Chicago, 2004).
10.
On extreme manifestations of faith in nineteenth-century France, see HarrisRuth, Lourdes: Body and spirit in the secular age (Bath, 1999); HarrisRuth, “Possession on the borders: The ‘mal de morzine’ in nineteenth-century France”, Journal of modern history, lxix (1997), 1997–78; KselmanThomas, Miracles and prophecies in nineteenth-century France (New Brunswick, 1983); LachapelleSofie, “Between miracle and sickness: Louise Lateau and the experience of stigmata and ecstasy”, Configurations, xii (2004), 2004–105. On French spiritism and séances, see EdelmanNicole, Voyantes, guérisseuses et visionnaires en France, 1785–1914 (Paris, 1995); Monroe, op. cit. (ref. 9); SharpLynn L., Secular spirituality: Reincarnation and spiritism in nineteenth century France (Lanham, MD, 2006); and LachapelleSofie, “A world outside of science: French attitudes toward mediumistic phenomena, 1853–1931”, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Notre Dame, 2002.
11.
See SecordJames A., “Knowledge in transit”, Isis, xcv (2004), 654–72, and LightmanBernard, Victorian popularizers of science: Designing nature for new audiences (Chicago, 2007), p. ix. On the geography of scientific knowledge, see LivingstoneDavid N., Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge (Chicago, 2003). On popular science and popularizers, see FyfeAileen and LightmanBernard (eds), Science in the marketplace: Nineteenth-century sites and experiences (Chicago, 2007); and Lightman, op. cit., particularly pp. 5–17, for an historiography on the topic. On the history of the popularization of science in France, see BéguetBruno (ed.), La science pour tous: Sur la vulgarisation scientifique en France de 1850 à 1914 (Paris, 1990); Bensaude-VincentBernadette, La science populaire dans la presse et l'édition, XIXe et XXe siècles (Paris, 1997); and PyensonSusan Sheets, “Popular science periodicals in Paris and London: The emergence of a low scientific culture, 1820–1875”, Annals of science, xlii (1985), 1985–72.
12.
On Nollet, see for example, LynnMichael R., Popular science and public opinion in eighteenth-century France (Manchester, 2006), 1–2, 22–25.
13.
Ibid., 1–2, 32–33, 50–51.
14.
ChabaudGilles, “La physique amusante et les jeux expérimentaux en France au XVIIIème siècle”, Ludica, ii (1996), 61–73; idem, “Science, magie et illusion: Les romans de la physique amusante (1784–1789)”, Revue du roman populaire, viii (1997a), 18–37; idem, “Entre sciences et sociabilités: Les expériences de l'illusion artificielle en France à la fin du XVIIIème siècle”, Bulletin de la Société d'Histoire Moderne et Contemporaine, xliv (1997b), 36–42.
15.
Chabaud, op. cit. (ref. 14, 1997b), 36. On amusing physics during the eighteenth century, see Chabaud, op. cit. (ref. 14, 1996, 1997a, 1997b); and Lynn, op. cit. (ref. 12).
16.
See, for example, BlocquelSimon-François, Les mille et un tours, ou expériences de physique amusante et de magie blanche (Paris, 1856, 1869); DelarueA.-O., Le magicien des salons, ou le diable couleur de rose: Recueil nouveau de tours d'escamotage, de physique amusante, de chimie récréative, de tours de cartes, magie blanche, etc., mis en ordre par Richard (A.-O. Delarue) et suivi d'un supplément par M. Delion (Paris, 1856, 1860, 1873); Le petit physicien contenant les secrets et les recettes de toutes les magies, expériences de physique amusantes, fantasmagories, … (Paris, 1854, 1855, 1860, 1864).
17.
L'escamoteur de bonne société ou recueil de tours les plus récréatifs de physique, chimie et fantastmagorie augmentée des expériences les plus nouvelles (Paris, 1840), 5.
18.
For example, see SavignyG.-B., Les amusements de la science: 300 expériences faciles et à la portée de tous de physique, chimie, mathématiques, travaux d'amateur (Paris, 1905), 1–2.
19.
Le prestidigitateur, ii (1920), 162.
20.
TessierHenri and MarcelL., 1874 Almanach théatral (Paris, 1874), 133.
21.
Robin, op. cit. (ref. 1, 1864), cover page.
22.
L'illusioniste: Secret des prestidigitateurs, amateurs et professionals, i (1902), 1–2.
23.
Robin, op. cit. (ref. 1, 1864), 10.
24.
The Palais-Royal shows were geared, at least in part, to a wealthier audience than those of the boulevards, but the clientele was probably mixed. Isherwood, op. cit. (ref. 3, 1986), 248–9.
25.
On the new magic of the nineteenth century, see Lamb, op. cit. (ref. 2), p. xi.
26.
See, for example, Guides Cicerone, Paris, son histoire, ses monuments, ses musées, ses établissements divers, son administration, son commerce, ses plaisirs: Nouveau guide des voyageurs (Paris, 1854), 296.
27.
EvansHenry Ridgely, A master of modern magic: The life and adventures of Robert-Houdin (New York, 1932), 33. On Robert-Houdin, see FechnerChristian, La magie de Robert-Houdin: Une vie d'artiste (2 vols, Boulogne, 2002); and Robert-HoudinJ.-E., Confidences et révélations: Comment on deviant sorcier (Blois, 1868).
28.
Robert-Houdin, op. cit. (ref. 27), 289–96.
29.
Robert-Houdin, op. cit. (ref. 27), 305–51. On the magician's time in London, see Lambop. cit. (ref. 2), 32–34.
30.
On the house in Blois, see Robert-Houdin, Le Prieuré: Organisations mystérieuses pour le confort et l'agrément d'une demeure (Paris, 1867).
31.
The Robert-Houdin theatre would close down in 1917. Most of the contents of the space at the time, including some of his famous automata, were given to the Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers and many were said to have been lost or damaged in the 1930s. On the magician's trip to Algeria, see Robert-Houdin, op. cit. (ref. 27), 356–402. On the fate of his automata at the Conservatoire des Arts et Métiers, see HamelMaurice, “Robert Houdin évoqué par sa petite fille”, Comeadia, 29 July 1928, 31–32.
32.
SalièsPierre, Le commandeur Marius Cazeneuve (Toulouse, 1983), 73, lists many other inventions, mostly linked with time and space calculations. On Cazaneuve's experiences in Madagascar, see CazeneuveMarius, A la cour de Madagascar, magie et diplomatie (Paris, 1896); and PaillardYvan G., “Visions mythiques d'une Afrique « colonisable »: Madagascar et les fantasmes européens à la fin du XIXème siècle”, Revue française d'histoire d'outre-mer, lxxvii (1990), 1990–76.
33.
Salies, op. cit. (ref. 32), 17.
34.
ParisienLe Rire, Fabrique d'appareils de prestidigitation & d'illusion: Catalogue general (Paris, n. d.), 111.
35.
For example, see the Journal de la prestidigitation, i, no. 1 (1895), 8.
36.
BlancheA., “L'illusion au théâtre”, Journal de la prestidigitation, vii, no. 28 (1911), 2–3.
37.
MoynetGeorges, L'envers du théâtre: Machines et decorations (Paris, 1873), 2–9.
38.
de NansoutyMax, Les trucs du théâtre, du cirque et de la foire (Paris, 1909), 6.
39.
Vaulabelle and Hémardinquer, op. cit. (ref. 6), 1.
Nansouty, op. cit. (ref. 38), 27–31; Moynet, op. cit. (ref. 37), 103–11. According to Nansouty, gas lighting replaced oil lighting as early as the 1820s. As for the use of electricity at the theatre, it began during the Exposition d'Électricité of Paris in 1881.
42.
Nansouty, op. cit. (ref. 38), 36.
43.
Ibid., 37–42.
44.
Ibid., 43–45.
45.
Ibid., 48.
46.
Vaulabelle and Hémardinquer, op. cit. (ref. 6), 289.
47.
Nansouty, op. cit. (ref. 38), 59–63.
48.
RobertsonE. G., Fantasmagorie de Robertson, cour des capuchines, près la place Vendôme. Tous les jours à sept heures (Paris, 1800), 7. On Robertson, see LevieFrançoise, Etienne-Gaspard Robertson: La vie d'un fantasmagore (Brussels, 1990).
49.
Isherwood, op. cit. (ref. 3, 1986), 199–200.
50.
On Pepper and his ghosts, see Lightman, op. cit. (ref. 11), 167–9, 196–218; LightmanBernard, “Lecturing in the spatial economy of science”, in Fyfe and Lightman (eds), op. cit. (ref. 11), 111–24; MorusIwan Rhys, “‘More the aspect of magic than anything natural’: The philosophy of demonstration”, ibid., 336–70. On Robin and the appropriation of Pepper's ghosts, see Mannoni, op. cit. (ref. 1, 1995), 106.
51.
FourtierH., Projections et agrandissements. Manuel pratique de la lanterne de projection. Description et conduite des appareils. Fabrication des tableaux, agrandissements et fantasmagorie (Paris, 1889), 177.
52.
Moynet, op. cit. (ref. 1), 277. There has been some work aiming to recover the experiences of past audiences of popular science at various sites suggesting that there was no unique experience of museum displays, books, or lectures. On the audience and its understanding and appropriation of a performance or a display, see, for example, CooterRoger and PumfreyStephen, “Separate spheres and public places: Reflections on the history of science popularization and science in popular culture”, History of science, xxxii (1994), 237–67; and AlbertiSamuel J. M., “The museum affect: Visiting collections of anatomy and natural history”, in Fyfe and Lightman (eds), op. cit. (ref. 11), 371–403.
53.
Fourtier, op. cit. (ref. 51), 178.
54.
Moynet, op. cit. (ref. 1), 276–81. There seems to be some confusion as to when the play was first staged. Moynet claims the play first took place in 1866.
55.
Ibid., 281–2.
56.
Ibid., 274–6.
57.
On the association of magicians and early cinema, see Barnouw, The magician and the cinema (New York, 1981); DeslandesJacques, Le boulevard du cinéma à l'époque de Georges Méliès (Paris, 1963); Malthête-MélièsMadeline, Méliès et la naissance du spectacle cinématographique (Paris, 1984); Mannoni, op. cit. (ref. 1, 1995); NorthDan, “Magic and illusion in early cinema”, Studies in French cinema, i (2001), 2001–79; and SolomonMatthew, “Up-to-date magic: Theatrical conjuring and the trick film”, Theatre journal, lviii (2006), 2006–615.
58.
BessyMaurice and DucaLo, Georges Méliès (Paris, 1961), 26, 175.
59.
BarnouwErik, op. cit. (ref. 57), 48.
60.
WilliamsRosalind, Dream worlds: Mass consumption in late nineteenth-century France (Berkeley, 1982), 78.
61.
On magicians and their contribution to early cinema, see Barnouw, op. cit. (ref. 57).
62.
Journal de la prestidigitation, viii, no. 32 (1912), 1–2.
63.
On magicians performing in vaudevilles, see Milbourne, op. cit. (ref. 2), 274–92.
64.
Lynn, op. cit. (ref. 12), 1–2.
65.
There are many tourist guides published on Paris at the time. See, for example, L'album-guide Parisien. Théatres, concerts et spectacles divers. Analyse des ouvrages du répertoire de l'Opéra. A travers l'exposition. Les environs de Paris (Paris, 1889); Le Cicerone Parisien, indicteur industriel, commercial et artistique; guide de l'étranger à Paris (Paris, 1847); FrébaultElie, La vie de Paris. Guide pittoresque et pratique du visiteur (Paris, 1878); Guides Cicerone, op. cit. (ref. 26); Guide des plaisirs à Paris. Paris le jour, Paris la nuit. La Tournée des Grands-Ducs. Comment on s'amuse. Ou l'on s'amuse. Ce qu'il faut voir. Ce qu'il faut faire (Paris, 1899, 1906); Guide pittoresque de l'étranger dans Paris et ses environs (Paris, 1855); and de P***Marin J. C. G., Quinze jours à Paris ou guide de l'étranger dans la capitale et ses environs. Tableau synoptique et pittoresque (Paris, 1852). On Paris and the spectacularization of city life, see Schwartz, op. cit. (ref. 6), 1–3. On the city as a performative space, see DierigSvenLachmundJens and MendelsohnAndrew L., “Introduction: Toward an urban history of science”, Osiris, 2nd ser., xviii (2003), 2003–19.