GoldsmithOliver, A history of the Earth and animated nature (1774; Glasgow, 1857), 11; PorterRoy, “The urban and the rustic in Enlightenment London”, in TeichMikulášPorterRoyGustafssonBo (eds), Nature and society in historical context (Cambridge, 1997), 176–94, p. 176.
2.
PorterRoy, Enlightenment: Britain and the creation of the modern world (London, 2001), 295, 319; compare the slightly different versions in Porter, “In England's green and pleasant land: The English Enlightenment and the environment”, in FlintKateMorphyHoward (eds), Culture, landscape and the environment (Oxford, 2000), 15–43, and “The environment and the Enlightenment: The English experience”, in DastonLorrainePomataGianna (eds), The faces of nature in Enlightenment Europe (Berlin, 2003), 17–38, citation from p. 38.
3.
Porter, Enlightenment (ref. 2), 305, 382, citing JacobM. C., The cultural meaning of the Scientific Revolution (New York, 1988), 116ff.
4.
Porter, Enlightenment (ref. 2), 319.
5.
Porter, “The urban and the rustic” (ref. 1), 176, 179, 191; PorterRoy, London: A social history (London, 1994), 113–16.
6.
WilleyBasil, The eighteenth-century background (London, 1940); Porter, “Environment and Enlightenment” (ref. 2), 38; PlumbJ. H., “The Walpoles: Father and son”, in PlumbJ. H. (ed.), Studies in social history: A tribute to G. M. Trevelyan (London, 1955), 179–207; WilliamsRaymond, The country and the city (London, 1973); WrightPatrick, On living in an old country: The national past in contemporary Britain (London, 1985); and SamuelRaphael, Theatres of memory: Past and present in contemporary culture (London, 1994).
7.
PorterRoy, The making of geology: Earth science in Britain 1660–1815 (Cambridge, 1977), 104, and idem, “The terraqueous globe”, in RousseauG. S.PorterRoy (eds), The ferment of knowledge (Cambridge, 1980), 285–324, p. 286. For enlightened agronomy see BourdeAndré, Agronomie et agronomes en France au 18e siècle (Paris, 1967); WilmotSarah, The business of improvement: Agriculture and scientific culture in Britain 1700–1870 (Reading, 1990); GroveRichard, Green imperialism: Colonial expansion, tropical island Edens and the origins of environmentalism 1600–1860 (Cambridge, 1995); CorvolAndrée (ed.), La Nature en revolution 1750–1800 (Paris, 1993); and DraytonRichard, Nature's government: Science, imperial Britain and the “improvement” of the world (New Haven, 2000).
8.
Porter, Making of geology (ref. 7), 238.
9.
Porter, “Terraqueous globe” (ref. 7), 313.
10.
YoungArthur, “Conduct of experiments in agriculture”, Annals of agriculture, v (1786), 17–46.
11.
PorterRoy, English society in the eighteenth century (Harmondsworth, 1982), 56.
12.
DenisGilles, “La representation de la maladie des plantes”, in Corvol (ed.), Nature en revolution (ref. 7), 94–106, p. 94.
13.
Young, “Conduct of experiments” (ref. 10), 20–21.
14.
Porter, English society (ref. 11), 221.
15.
TullJethro, New horse houghing husbandry (London, 1731), pp. xxvi, 115, 124.
16.
ThompsonE. P., Customs in common (London, 1991), 140, and McNeilMaureen, Under the banner of science: Erasmus Darwin and his age (Manchester, 1987), 186.
17.
LehmannWilliam, Henry Home, Lord Kames and the Scottish Enlightenment (The Hague, 1971), 111; KamesLord, The gentleman farmer (Edinburgh, 1776), 284–5; SmithAdam, An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (1776; 4 vols, Edinburgh, 1814), ii, 55; and Thompson, Customs in common (ref. 16), 281, n. 1.
18.
Young, “Conduct of experiments” (ref. 10), 31.
19.
MarshallWilliam, Minutes of agriculture (London, 1783), “Digest”, 7, 35, 39–40. For Young as aerial chemist, see GazleyJohn G., The life of Arthur Young (Philadelphia, 1973), 151–3.
20.
Marshall, Minutes of agriculture (ref. 19), sig. b2v; WidmalmSven, “Accuracy, rhetoric and technology: The Paris-Greenwich triangulation 1784–88”, in FrangsmyrToreHeilbronJ. L.RiderRobin E. (eds), The quantifying spirit in the eighteenth century (Berkeley, 1990), 179–206; and EdneyMatthew, “Mathematical cosmography and the social ideology of British cartography 1780–1820”, Imago mundi, xlvi (1994), 101–16.
21.
HobsbawmEric, “Capitalisme et agriculture: Les réformateurs écossais au 18e siècle”, Annales ESC, xxxiii (1978), 580–601, and CregeenEric, “The changing role of the House of Argyll in the Scottish Highlands”, in PhillipsonN. T.MitchisonRosalind (eds), Scotland in the age of improvement (Edinburgh, 1970), 5–23.
22.
Porter, Making of geology (ref. 7), 110–11, 219; Porter, “Terraqueous globe” (ref. 7), 298.
23.
PorterRoy, “The industrial revolution and the rise of the science of geology”, in TeichMikulášYoungRobert (eds), Changing perspectives in the history of science: Essays in honour of Joseph Needham (London, 1972), 320–43, pp. 326, 342.
24.
Porter, “Rise of the science of geology” (ref. 23), 323.
25.
PhillipsJohn, Memoirs of William Smith (London, 1844), 9–10, 16, and HudsonKenneth, Patriotism with profit: British agricultural societies in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries (London, 1972), 11–14.
26.
Porter, Making of geology (ref. 7), 99, 132, 137, and Porter, “Rise of the science of geology” (ref. 23), 326.
27.
Phillips, William Smith (ref. 25), 32–46, 77–79, and Porter, Making of geology (ref. 7), 179–80.
28.
Porter, Making of geology (ref. 7), 105, and ThompsonE. P., The making of the English working class (Harmondsworth, 1968), 254. See ParssinnenT. M., “Thomas Spence and the origins of English land nationalisation”, Journal of history of ideas, xxxiv (1973), 135–41, and ChaseMalcolm, The people's farm: English radical agrarianism 1775–1840 (Oxford, 1988).
29.
Thompson, Making of the English working class (ref. 28), 176–9, 254; McCalmanIain, Radical underworld: Prophets, revolutionaries and pornographers in London 1795–1840 (Cambridge, 1988), 99, and Porter, Enlightenment (ref. 2), 460.
30.
Chase, The people's farm (ref. 28), 127–31.
31.
WilliamsRaymond, Keywords (London, 1983), 219; Porter, “Terraqueous globe” (ref. 7), 324, and Porter, Enlightenment (ref. 2), 319. For agronomy's aftermath, see Wilmot, Business of improvement (ref. 7), and KrohnW.SchaeferW., “The origins and structure of agricultural chemistry”, in LemaineG. (eds), Perspectives on the emergence of scientific disciplines (Paris, 1976), 27–52.