HakfoortCasper, “The missing syntheses in the historiography of science”, History of science, xxix (1991), 207–17.
2.
DrakeStillman, “Vincenzio Galilei and Galileo”, in his Galileo studies: Personality, tradition, and revolution (Ann Arbor, 1970), 43–62.
3.
GalileiGalileo, Discourses on two new sciences, transl. and ed. by DrakeStillman, 2nd edn (Toronto, 1989). An earlier translation (1914) by Henry Crew and Alfonso de Salvio is available as a reprint (New York, 1952).
4.
DrakeStillman, Galileo at work: His scientific biography (Chicago, 1978); Stillman Drake: Essays on Galileo and the history and philosophy of science, selected and introduced by SwerdlowN. M.LevereT. H. (3 vols, Toronto, 1999).
5.
KoyréAlexandre, Metaphysics and measurement: Essays in the Scientific Revolution (London, 1968), 94: “It is obvious that the Galilean experiments are completely worthless: The very perfection of their results is a rigorous proof of their incorrection.”.
6.
SettleThomas B., “An experiment in the history of science”, Science, cxxxiii (1961), 19–23: On the reproduction of Galileo's inclined plane experiment (Two new sciences, ed. by Crewde Salvio (ref. 3), 178–9). Further reproductions of Galileo's supposedly “imaginary” experiments are reviewed by NaylorR. H., “Galileo's experimental discourse”, in The uses of experiment, ed. by GoodingDavidPinchTrevorSchafferSimon (Cambridge, 1989), 117–34.
7.
Galileo Galilei: On motion and On mechanics, comprising De motu (c. 1590), transl. with an introduction and notes by DrabkinI. E., and Le meccaniche (c. 1600), transl. with an introduction and notes by Stillman Drake (Madison, 1960).
8.
Discoveries and opinions of Galileo, transl. with an introduction and notes by DrakeStillman (New York, 1957), 114.
9.
RennJürgenDamerowPeterRiegerSimone, “Hunting the white elephant: When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall?”, pp. 299–419 of the symposium “Galileo in context”, Science in context, xiii (2000), 271–691.
Two new sciences (ref. 3), Crew and Salvio translation, 148–9, 249, 275 and 290.
12.
Galileo Galilei: Operations of the geometric and military compass, translated with an introduction by DrakeStillman (Washington, D.C., 1978).
13.
SchofieldChristine, on p. 35, and Suzanne Débarbat and Curtis Wilson, on p. 145, in Planetary astronomy from the Renaissance to the rise of astrophysics. Part A: Tycho Brahe to Newton, ed. by TatonR.WilsonC. (vol. ii of The general history of astronomy;Cambridge, 1989).
14.
Drake, op. cit. (ref. 10), 130–44.
15.
SwerdlowNoel M., “Galileo's discoveries with the telescope and their evidence for the Copernican theory”, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo, ed. by MachamerPeter (Cambridge, 1998), 244–70.
16.
Sidereus nuncius di Galileo Galilei, facsimile reprint (Pisa, 1964). Starry messenger, translated by DrakeStillman, op. cit. (ref. 8), 21–58. GalileiGalileo, Sidereus nuncius or Sidereal messenger, transl. with introduction, conclusion and notes by Van HeldenAlbert (Chicago, 1989).
17.
RedondiPietro, Galileo heretic, transl. by RosenthalRaymond (Princeton, 1987), 107–18.
18.
RonanColin A., “The origins of the reflecting telescope”, Journal of the British Astronomical Association, ci (1991), 335–42.
19.
NorthJohn, “Thomas Harriot and the first telescopic observations of sunspots”, in Thomas Harriot: Renaissance scientist, ed. by ShirleyJohn W. (Oxford, 1974), 129–65. Van Helden, op. cit. (ref. 16), 105.
20.
BredekampHorst, “Galileo as draftsman”, 423–62, and BoothSara ElizabethVan HeldenAlbert, “The Virgin and the telescope: The moons of Cigoli and Galileo”, 463–86, in the symposium “Galileo in context” (ref. 9).
21.
SheaWilliam, “Galileo's Copernicanism: The science and the rhetoric”, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo (ref. 15), 211–43.
22.
Depicted by Van Helden, op. cit. (ref. 16), 108; by Shea, op. cit. (ref. 21), 222; and with a critical discussion by PalmieriPaolo, “Galileo and the discovery of the phases of Venus”, Journal for the history of astronomy, xxxii (2001), 109–29.
23.
WallaceWilliam A., Galileo and his sources: The heritage of the Collegio Romano in Galileo's science (Princeton, 1984).
24.
Drake, op. cit. (ref. 10), 155.
25.
McMullinErnan, “Galileo on science and Scripture”, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo (ref. 15), 271–347.
26.
FinocchiaroMaurice A., The Galileo Affair: A documentary history (Berkeley, 1989): Castelli–Galileo correspondence, December 1613, pp. 47–54; Galileo'sLetter to the Grand Duchess Cristina (1615), 87–118, esp. pp. 100–1.
27.
FantoliAnnibale, Galileo for Copernicanism and for the Church, transl. by CoyneGeorge V. (Vatican City, 1994), 238–40.
28.
A defense of Galileo the mathematician from Florence by Thomas Campanella, transl. with an introduction and notes by BlackwellRichard J. (Notre Dame, 1994).
29.
Fantoli, op. cit. (ref. 27), 156, n. 55, and 288, n. 33.
30.
Drake, op. cit. (ref. 2), “Galileo and the concept of inertia”, and “The case against circular inertia”, 240–78.
31.
Documented in Finocchiaro, op. cit. (ref. 26), 200–2.
32.
GingerichOwen, “The Galileo Affair”, in The Great Copernican Chase (Cambridge, 1992), 105–22, with map of locations of De revolutionibus in 1620 on p. 109.
33.
Redondi, op. cit. (ref. 17), 88–97.
34.
The assayer, transl. by Drake, op. cit. (ref. 8), 229–80.
35.
Drake, op. cit. (ref. 2), “The dispute over bodies in water”, 159–76. The Latin stanzas of Adulatio perniciosa are quoted in The crime of Gaileo by Giorgio de Santillana (Chicago, 1955), 156; English translation, in Galileo: A life, by RestonJamesJr (London, 1994), 189–90.
36.
The assayer, transl. by Drake, op. cit. (ref. 8), 237–8 and 274–8.
37.
FeldhayRivka, Galileo and the Church: Political inquisition or critical dialogue? (Cambridge, 1995).
38.
Redondi, op. cit. (ref. 17), 137–227.
39.
Galileo: Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems — Ptolemaic and Copernican, transl. by DrakeStillman, 2nd edn (Berkeley, 1967).
40.
Aristotle, On the heavens, 268a12–16; 284b 24–25.
41.
Galileo: Dialogue (ref. 39), 58–59.
42.
GeymonatLudovico, Galileo Galilei: A biography and inquiry into his philosophy of science, transl. by DrakeStillman (New York, 1965), 136–55. Fantoli, op. cit. (ref. 27), 369–461. Redondi, op. cit. (ref. 17), 227–71. Documentation in Finocchiaro, op. cit. (ref. 26), 204–93.
43.
YatesFrances A., Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic tradition (London, 1964), 42–43, and frontispiece depicting the mosaic pavement.
44.
StanfordPeter, The She-Pope: A quest for the truth behind the mystery of Pope Joan (London, 1998), 110–15et passim, with portraits and busts of Pope Joan depicted in the plates between pp. 86 and 87. KellyJ. D. N., The Oxford dictionary of popes (Oxford, 1986), 329–30.
45.
SobelDava, Galileo's daughter: A drama of science, faith and love (London, 1999).
46.
FahieJ. J., Galileo: His life and work (London, 1903), 345–6.
47.
Von GeblerKarl, Galileo Galilei and the Roman Curia, transl. by SturgeGeorgeMrs (London, 1879), 190.
48.
Two new sciences (ref. 3), Crew and Salvio translation, 178–9 and 276–7.
49.
OrnsteinMartha, The role of scientific societies in the seventeenth century (Chicago, 1928), 76–90.
50.
Essays of natural experiments made in the Academie del Cimento, transl. by WallerRichard (London, 1684); facsimile reprint, with a new introduction by A. Rupert Hall (New York, 1964).
51.
SettleThomas B., “Borelli, Giovanni Alfonso, 1608–1679”, Dictionary of scientific biography, ii, 306–14. KoyréAlexandre, The astronomical revolution (London, 1973), 465–513. MeliDomenico Bertolini, “Shadows and deception: From Borelli's Theoricae to the Saggi of the Cimento”, The British journal for the history of science, xxxi (1998), 383–403.
52.
GalluzziPaolo, “The sepulchers of Galileo: The ‘living’ remains of a hero of science”, in The Cambridge companion to Galileo (ref. 15), 411–47, with Galileo's monument depicted on p. 434. SegreMichael, “Viviani's Life of Galileo”, Isis, lxxx (1989), 207–31.