Das, Veena . 1985. Paradigms of body symbolism, In Richard Burghart and Audrey Cantlie, eds., Indian religion. London: Curzon Press.
2.
Larson, Gerald and R.S. Bhattacharya. 1987. Sāmkhya: A dualist tradition in Indian philosophy. Vol. IV of Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
3.
Mines, Diane Paul . 1989. Hindu periods of death `impurity'. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.)23, 1: pp. 103-130.
4.
Marriott, McKim 1976. Hindu transactions: Diversity without dualism. In Bruce Kapferer, ed., Transactions and meaning: Directions in the anthropology of exchange, pp. 109-142. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
5.
Marriott, McKim1989. Constructing an Indian ethnosociology. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.)23, 1: 1-39.
6.
Mukerji, D.P. 1958. Diversities. New Delhi: People's Publishing House.
7.
O'Flaherty, Wendy D. , ed. 1980. Karma and rebirth in Indian classical traditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Sharma, K.N.1986a. Review article based on T.N. Madan, ed., Way of life: King, householder, renouncer. The eastern anthropologist39, 1: 67-86.
9.
Sharma, K.N.1986b. The purusārtha in traditional texts. Discussion note on Way of life: King, householder, renouncer. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.)20, 2: 279-287.
10.
Sharma, K.N. 1988a. Presidential address to the tenth annual conference of the UP Sociological Association. Varanasi. In Hindi.
11.
Sharma, K.N.1988b. Review of T.N. Madan, Non-renunciation: Themes and interpretations of Hindu culture. Sociological bulletin37, 1 & 2: 144-147.
12.
Sharma, K.N.1989. Search for Indian traditional paradigm of society. Journal of Indian council of philosophical research6, 3: 131-144.