This paper explores the current practice and representation of dowry marriage by members of Brahman, Gosain and Chamar families in semi-rural eastern Uttar Pradesh. The paper approaches dowry not primarily as an institution to do with the transfer of property at marriage, but more importantly as the currently most significant means of assessing and representing social status, honour and prestige in the region. As the most comprehensive public measure of social prestige, dowry was an important arena within which people represented their social positions and their relations to others. The paper explores people's discursive constructions of dowry marriage and the manner in which they used their understanding of dowry to reflect upon social relations within. their communities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnes, R.H.1980. Marriage, exchange, and the meaning of corporations in eastern Indonesia. In J. Comaroff, ed., The meaning of marriage payments, pp., 93-123. New York: Academic.
2.
Bourdieu, Pierre.1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
3.
Caplan, Lionel.1984. Bridegroom price in urban India: Class, caste, and 'dowry evil' among Christians in Madras. Man (n.s.) 19: 216-33.
4.
Cohn, Bernard.1955. The changing status of a depressed caste. In McKim Marriott, ed., Village India, pp., 53-77. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Collier, Jane Fishburne.1988. Marriage and inequality in classless societies . Stanford: Stanford University Press.
6.
Comaroff, John.1980. Introduction. In John Comaroff, ed., The meaning of marriage payments, pp., 1-47. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Derne, Steve.1992. Commonsense understandings as cultural constraint . Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 26, 2: 195-223.
8.
Dumont, Louis.1966. Marriage in India, the present state of the question, part 3: North India in relation to south India. Contributions to Indian sociology9: 90-114.
9.
Giddens, Anthony.1984. The constitution of society. Berkeley : SAGE Publications.
10.
Goody, Jack.1973. Bridewealth and dowry in Africa and Eurasia. In Jack Goody and Stanley J. Tambiah, Bridewealth and dowry, pp. 1-58. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
11.
Hatch, Elvin.1989. Theories of social honor. American anthropologist91, 2: 341-53.
12.
Hughes, Diane Owen.1978. From brideprice to dowry in Mediterranean Europe . Journal of family history3: 262-96.
13.
Ifeka, Caroline.1989. Hierarchical woman: The 'dowry' system and its implications among Christians in Goa, India. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 23, 2: 261-85.
14.
Kapadia, Karin.1993. Marrying money: Changing preference and practice in Tamil marriage. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 27, 1: 25-51.
15.
Kelly, Raymond.1993. Constructing inequality: The fabrication of a hierarchy of virtue among the Etoro. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
16.
McCreery, John.1976. Women's property rights and dowry in China and South Asia . Ethnology15: 163-74.
17.
Madan, T.N.1975. Structural implications of marriage in north India: Wife-givers and wife-takers among the Pandits of Kashmir. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 9, 2: 217-243.
18.
Nishimura, Yuko.1994. Marriage payments among the Nagarattars in south India . Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 28, 2: 243-72.
19.
Ortner, Sherry.1984. Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative studies in society and history26, 1: 126-66.
20.
Ortner, Sherry and Harriet Whitehead.1981. Introduction. In Sherry Ortner and Harriet Whitehead, eds., Sexual meanings: The cultural construction of gender and sexuality, pp. 1-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Parry, Jonathan.1979. Caste and kinship in Kangra. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
22.
Pocock, David.1972. Kanbi and Patidar: A study of the Patidar community of Gujarat. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
23.
Raheja, Gloria Goodwin.1988. The poison in the gift. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
24.
Rajaraman, Indira.1983. Economics of bride-price and dowry. Economic and political weekly18, 8: 275-79.
25.
Roulet, Marguerite.1994. The idea, practice, and politics of dowry in two north Indian villages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan .
26.
Sahlins, Marshall.1981. Historical metaphors and mythical realities. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
27.
Sharma, Ursula.1984. Dowry in north India: Its consequences for women . In R. Hirschon, ed., Women and property: Women as property, pp. 62-74. London: Croom Helm Ltd.
28.
Smith, Raymond.1987. Hierarchy and the dual marriage system in West India society . In J.F. Collier and S.J. Yanagisako, eds., Gender and kinship: Essays toward a unified analysis, pp. 163-96. Stanford : Stanford University Press.
29.
Srinivas, M.N.1984. Some reflections on dowry. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
30.
Strathern, Marilyn.1984. Marriage exchanges: A Melanesian comment. Annual review of anthropology13: 41-73.
31.
Tambiah, Stanley J.1973. Dowry and bridewealth and the property rights of women in . South Asia. In Jack Goody and Stanley J. Tambiah, Bridewealth and dowry, pp. 59-169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
—. 1989. Bridewealth and dowry revisited: The position of women in sub-Saharan Africa and north India. Current anthropology30: 413-35.
33.
Upadhya, Carol B.1990. Dowry and women's property in coastal Andhra Pradesh . Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 24, 1: 29-59.
34.
Van Der Veen, Klaas.1972. I give thee my daughter: A study of marriage and hierarchy among the Anavil Brahmans of south Gujarat. Assen: Van Gorcum and Comp.
35.
Vatuk, Sylvia.1975. Gifts and affines in north India. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 9, 2: 155-96.
