Capra, F. 1975. The tao of physics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2.
Carman, J.B. 1985. Conclusion: Axes of value in Hindu society. In John B. Carman and F.A. Marglin, eds., Purity and auspiciousness in Indian society, pp. 109-120. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
3.
Chase, I.D. 1984. Social process and hierarchy formation in small groups: A comparative perspective. In P.R. Barchas, ed., Social hierarchies: Essays toward a socio-physiological perspective. Westport: Greenwood Press.
4.
Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Dirks, N.B. 1990. The original caste: Power, history and hierarchy in South Asia. In McKim Marriott, ed., India through Hindu categories, pp. 59-77. New Delhi: Sage.
6.
Kant, I. 1929. The critique of pure reason (trans. Norman Kemp Smith). London: McMillan.
7.
Kiparsky, P. 1982. Some theoretical problems in Panini's grammar. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
8.
Marriott, M.1989. Constructing an Indian ethnosociology. Contributions to Indian sociology23, 1: 1-39.
9.
Marriott, M. , ed. 1990. India through Hindu categories. Delhi: Sage.
10.
Marriott, M.1991. On `Constructing an Indian ethnosociology'. Contributions to Indian sociology25, 2: 295-308.
11.
Popper, K. and J. Eccles. 1977. The self and its brain. London: Springer.
12.
Quine, W.V.O. 1962. Word and object. New York: Wiley.
13.
Ray, R.1990. And why an Indian sociology?Contributions to Indian sociology24, 2: 265-276.
14.
Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
15.
Sharma, A. 1992. `Constructing an Indian ethnosociology' by McKim Marriott: Some general comments. Elsewhere in this volume.
16.
Szanton, D.1976. South and South-East Asia: New concerns of the council. Social science research council items30, 2: 1-2.
17.
Sixel, F. 1988. Crisis and critique. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
18.
Wittgenstein, L. 1972. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.