Man need not be degraded to a machine, by being denied to be a ghost in a machine. He might, after all, be a sort of animal, namely a higher mammal. There has yet to be ventured the hazardous leap to the hypothesis that perhaps he is a man.GILBERT RYLE
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alavi, H.A.1972. Kinship in west Punjab villages. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 6: 1-27.
2.
Berger, P.L.1966. Identity as a problem in the sociology of knowledge . European journal of sociology: 105-15.
3.
Berger, P.L. and T. Luckmann1966. The social construction of reality. New York: Double-day and Company.
4.
Berger, P.L.1969. The social reality of religion. London : Faber and Faber.
5.
________. 1974. The homeless mind. London: Pelican Press.
6.
Boudon, R.1971. The uses of structuralism. London: Heinemann Educational Books.
7.
Campbell, J.K.1964. Honour, family and patronage. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
8.
Das, V.1973. The structure of marriage preferences. Man8, 1: 30-35.
9.
_______. 1973. Hypergamy. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 7: 136-39.
10.
DAS, V. and U. CHAKRAVARTI, n. d. On the problems of women in India: a context analysis of Hindi news-media. Paper prepared for the national committee on the status of women in India.
11.
Eglar, Z.1960. A Punjabi village in Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press.
12.
Fortes, M.1949. The web of kinship among the Tallensi. London: Oxford University Press.
13.
G, I.1958. The presentation of the self in everyday life. U.S.A.: Anchor Books.
14.
Karve, I.1958. Kinship organization in India. Bombay : Asia Publishing House.
15.
KHERA, P. D. n. d. An essay on the sociology of ishk (love). (ms.).
16.
Leach, E.1968. On the kinship category tabu. In J. Goody, ed. The development cycle of domestic groups. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Leaf, M.1972. Information and behaviour in a Sikh village. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
18.
Levi-Strauss, C.1949. Les structures élémentaires de la parente. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France .
19.
Malinowski, B.1948. The problem of meaning in primitive language. In Magic, science and religion. Glencoe. (First published in C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards 1923, The meaning of meaning.)
20.
Madan, T.N.1965. Family and kinship: a study of the Pandits of rural Kashmir . Bombay: Asia Publishing House .
21.
Needham, R.1967. Terminology and alliance 2. Sociologians17: 39-54.
22.
_______. 1974. Age, category and descent. In Remarks and inventions: skeptical essays about kinshipLondon: Tavistock Publications.
23.
Radcliffe-Brown, A.R.1940. On joking relationships. Africa13: 195-210.
24.
_______. 1949. A further note on joking relationships. Africa19: 133-40.
25.
Schneider, D.1968. American kinship: a cultural account. Englewood-Cliffs: N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
26.
Schutz, Alfred.1962. Collected papers. The Hague : Nijhoff.
27.
Strawson, P.F.1950. On referring. Mind59: 320-44.
28.
Tan Don, P.1963. Punjabi century. London: Chatto and Windus.
29.
Vatuk, S.1969. A structural analysis of Hindi kinship terminology . Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 3: 94-115.
30.
_______. 1975. Gifts and affines in north India. Contributions to Indian sociology (n.s.) 2: 155-96. Yalman, N.1962. The structure of the Sinhalese kindred: a re-examination of Dravidian kinship terminology. American anthropologist64: 545-75.
31.
_______. 1964. On the purity of women among the castes of south India and Ceylon. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute93: 25-58.
