Carter, Anthony.1973. A comparative analysis of kinship and marriage in South Asia. Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 29-54.
2.
Casson, Ronald W.1973. Paired polarity relations in the formal analysis of a Turkish kinship terminology. EthnologyXII, 3: 275-99.
3.
Dumont, Louis.1966. Marriage in India: the present state of the question . Contributions to Indian sociology9: 90-114.
4.
Goodenough, Ward H.1956. Componential analysis and the study of meaning . Language32, 1: 195-216.
5.
—. 1967. Componential analysis. Science156, 1203.
6.
Inden Ronald and Ralph W. Nicholas .1972. The defining features of kinship in Bengali culture. Unpublished.
7.
Lounsbury, Floyd G.1964. The formal analysis of Crow- and Omaha-type kinship terminologies . In Ward H. Goodenough, ed. Explorations in cultural anthropology. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company. Pp. 351-93.
8.
—. Another view of the Trobriand kinship categories. In E. A. Hammel, ed. Formal semantic analysis. American anthropologist , Special Publication, 67, 5, part 2, 1965. 142-95.
9.
Madan, T.N.1965. Family and kinship: a study of the Pandits of rural Kashmir . New York: Asia.
10.
Malinowski, Bronislaw.1965. Coral gardens and their magic. Bloomington : Indiana University Press.
11.
Mayer, Adrian C.1965. Caste and kinship in central India. Los Angeles: University of California Press .
12.
Morris, Charles W.1949. Signs, language and behaviour. New York: Prentice-Hall. —. 1964 . Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
13.
Scheffler, Harold W. and Floyd G. Lounsbury .1971. A study in structural semantics . Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall .
14.
Schneider, David M.1968. American kinship: a cultural account. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
15.
Vatuk, Sylvia.1969. A structural analysis of the Hindi kinship terminology . Contributions to Indian sociology3: 94-115.
