The subaltern turn in historiography has changed the way we read history/histories. The omissions and silence(s) that happen at the stage of ‘fact creation’ provide us with a way of looking into how events become facts. Taking cues from the sociological and historical understanding of silencing, this article examines the process through which Muslim voices have been silenced in the historiography of Jharkhand’s statehood movement (the Jharkhand Andolan). While going through the mainstream accounts on this subject, what I encountered was a significant lack of discussion about the Muslim presence in the movement. This lack becomes visible in contrast to the accounts in the vernacular newspapers that recount how Muslims have been an integral part of the statehood struggle. Through personal interviews of Muslim Andolankaris (freedom fighters) conducted during my fieldwork along with the documents collected from their personal archives, I show how the subduing of Muslim voices was enabled by Jharkhand’s political parties and carried over to the common narration of the movement’s formation and history.
DrayW.H.1982. ‘Narration, Reduction and the Uses of History.’ In La philosophic de I’histoire [Philiosphy of History and Contemporary Historiography], edited by CarrDavid, DrayWilliam, GeraetsTheodore F., OuelletFerdinand, and WateletHubert, 197–214, Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
13.
EkkaWilliam and SinhaR. K.. 2004. Documentation of Jharkhand Movement. Kolkata: Anthropological Survey of India.
14.
FoucaultMichel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language. Translated by SmithA. M. Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books.
15.
FrickerMiranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
16.
GalS.1994. ‘Between Speech and Silence: The Problematics of Research on Language and Gender.’ In The Women and Language Debate: A Sourcebook, edited by RomanCamille, JuhaszSuzanne, and MillerChristanne, 407–32. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
17.
GhoshA.1991. ‘Probing the Jharkhand Question.’Economic and Political Weekly, 26(18): 1173–81.
18.
GhoshP.2016. ‘Political Identities and Dilemma in Jharkhand.’Socrates, 4(2): 27–55.
LangtonR.1993. ‘Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.’Philosophy and Public Affairs, 22(4): 293–330.
23.
MacphersonT. S. and HallettM. G.. 1917. Ranchi Gazetteers. Patna: Gazetteers Branch, Revenue Department.
24.
MahapatraL. K.1983‘The Jharkhand Party in Orissa.’ In Tribal Movements in India, Vol. 2, edited by SinghK. S., 67–86. New Delhi: Manohar Publication.
25.
MajidI.2013. Jharkhand Andolan aur Jharkhand Gomke Horo Sahab [Jharkhand Movement and Jharkhand leader Hero Saheb]. Ranchi: Jharkhand Press.
26.
MillsC.1999. The Racial Contract. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
27.
MundaR. and MullickS. Bosu. 2003. The Jharkhand Movement: Indigenous Peoples’ Struggle for Autonomy in India. Copenhagen: International Working Group for Indigenous Affairs.
28.
MundaR. and KeshariB. P.. 1992. ‘Recent Developments in the Jharkhand Movement.’India International Centre Quarterly, 19(3): 71–89.
29.
NoraP.1989. ‘Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.’Representations, 26: 7–24.
30.
PrakashA.1999. ‘Decolonization and Tribal Policy in Jharkhand: Continuities with Colonial Discourse.’Social Scientist, 27 (7-8): 113–39.
31.
PrakashG.1990. ‘Writing Post-Orientalist Histories of the Third World: Perspectives.’Comparative Studies in Society and History, 32(2): 383–408.
32.
RajA. L.1992. ‘Ideology and Hegemony in Jharkhand Movement.’Economic and Political Weekly, 27(5): 200–03.
33.
RanaL. N.1992. ‘The Adivasi Mahasabha (1938-1949): Launching Pad of Jharkhand Movement.’Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 53: 397–405.
34.
RanaL. N.1996. ‘Political Consciousness in Jharkhand, 1900-1947.’Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 57: 467–84.
35.
SarkarJ.2003. ‘Jharkhand Problem in Perspective.’ In The Jharkhand Movement: Indigenous Peoples’ Struggle for Autonomy in India, edited by MundaRam Dayal and MullickS. Bosu, 171–80. Copenhagen: IWGIA.
36.
SchwartzJ. M. and CookT.. 2002. ‘Archives, Records, and Power: The Making of Modern Memory.’Archival Science, 2 (1–2): 18.
37.
SenguptaNirmal, ed. 1982. Fourth World Dynamics: Jharkhand. New Delhi: Authors Guild Publication.
38.
ShahAlpa. 2010. In the Shadows of the State: Indigenous Politics, Environmentalism and Insurgency in Jharkhand India. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
39.
SinghK.S.1983. ‘Tribal Autonomy Movements in Chotanagpur.’ In Tribal Movement in India, edited by SinghK.S., 1–30. New Delhi: Manohar.
40.
SinghK.S.2004. ‘Ecology, Ethnicity. Regionalism and State Formation: An Exploration of the Jharkhand Movement.’ In Jharkhand Matters: Essays on Ethnicity, Regionalism and Development in India, edited by BalakrishnanRajib, 136–60. New Delhi: Konark Publishers.
41.
TabindaA.2011. Jharkhand Andolan me Musalmano ki Bhagidari [Participation of Muslims in Jharkhand Movement]. Ranchi: Sambad.
42.
TownleyC.2003. ‘Trust and the Curse of Cassandra (An Exploration of the Value of Trust).’Philosophy and the Contemporary World, 10(2): 105–11.
43.
TrouillotMichel-Rolph. 1990. ‘Good Day, Columbus: Silences, Power, and Public, History (1492–1892).’Public Culture, 3(1): 1–24.
44.
TrouillotMichel-Rolph. 1995. Silencing the Past: Power and the Production of History. Boston: Beacon Press.
45.
TrouillotMichel-Rolph. 1997. ‘Silencing the Past: Layers of Meaning in the Haitian Revolution.’ In Between History and Histories: The Making of Silences and Commemorations, edited by SiderGerald and SmithGavin, 31–61. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
46.
TuanaNancy. 2006. ‘The Speculum of Ignorance: The Women’s Health Movement and Epistemologies of Ignorance.’Hypatia, 21(3): 1–19.
47.
VidyarthiL. P.1969. Cultural Configuration of Ranchi: Survey of an Emerging Industrial City of Tribal India. Calcutta: University of Calcutta Press.
48.
XalxoAbha. 2003. ‘Aims and Achievements of Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (1973-2000).’Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 64: 1091–1102.
