BronkhorstJohannes. 1997. ‘Louis Dumont et les renonçants indiens’. Orientalia Suecana, 45–46 (1996–1997): 9–12.
2.
BronkhorstJohannes. 2016. How the Brahmins Won: From Alexander to the Guptas. (Handbook of Oriental Studies 2/30). Leiden/Boston: Brill.
3.
ReichDavid. 2018. Who We Are and How We Got Here. Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past. New York: Pantheon.
4.
BrandelAndrew, DasVeena, & RennderiaShalini2016. ‘Locations and locutions: Unravelling the concept of “world anthropology”.’ In Post-Western Sociology: From China to Europe, edited by Roulleau-BergerLaurence and PielinLi, 88–106. London and New York: Routledge.
5.
BühlerGeorg2013. Detailed Report of a Tour in Search of Sanskrit MSS: Made in Kashmir, Rajputana & Central India. Srinagar: Jaykay Books.
6.
ClooneyFrancis X.1997. ‘What’s a God? The Quest for the Right Understanding of Devata in Brahmanical Ritual Theory (Mimamsa).’International Journal of Hindu Studies, 1(2): 337–85.
7.
DasVeena. 2020. Textures of the Ordinary. Doing Anthropology After Wittgenstein. New York: Fordham University Press.
8.
DumontLouis, and PocockDavid. 1959. ‘Pure and impure.’Contributions to Indian Sociology, 3(1): 9–39.
9.
LarsenTimothy. 2014. The Slain God: Anthropologists and the Christian Faith. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
MajeedJaved. 2018. Colonialism and Knowledge in Grierson’s Linguistic Survey of India. New York: Routledge.
11.
MarchignoliSaverio2004. ‘Canonizing an Indian Text: A.W. Schlegel, W.von Humboldt, Hegel, and the Bhagvadgītā.’ In Sanskrit and ‘Orientalism’: Indology and Comparative Linguistics in Germany,1750–1958, edited by McGetchinDouglas T., ParkPeter K.J., and SarDesaiDamodar, 245–70. Delhi: Manohar Books.
12.
SenguptaIndra, and AliDaud, ed. 2011. Knowledge Production, Pedagogy, and Institutions in Colonial India. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
13.
DroitRoger-Pol. 1989. L’oubli de l’Inde: une amnésie philosophique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
14.
DasVeena. 1977. Structure and Cognition: Aspects of Hindu Caste and Ritual. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
15.
DirksN.2013. ‘G.S. Ghurye and the Politics of Sociological Knowledge.’Sociological Bulletin, 62(2): 239–53.
16.
DumontL.1957. ‘For a sociology of India.’Contributions to Indian Sociology, 1: 7–22.
17.
DumontL.1965. ‘The Functional Equivalents of the Individual in Caste Society.’Contributions to Indian Sociology, 8: 85–99.
18.
DumontL.1966. ‘A Fundamental Problem in the Sociology of Caste.’Contributions to Indian Sociology, 9(1): 17–32.
19.
DumontL.1970. ‘World Renunciation in Indian Religions.’ In Religion, Politics and History in India: Collected Papers in Indian sociology, edited by DumontL., 33–60. Paris: Mouton.
20.
Evans-PritchardE.E.1962. ‘Social Anthropology: Past and Present.’ In Essays in Social Anthropology, edited by Evans-PritchardE.E., 13–28. London: Faber and Faber.
21.
KapadiaK.M.1947. Hindu Kinship: An Important Chapter in Hindu Social History. Bombay: The Popular Book Depot.
22.
KapadiaK.M.1955. Marriage and Family in India. Calcutta: Oxford University Press.
23.
KarveI.1953. Kinship Organization in India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
24.
MominA.R.2013. ‘Revisiting the Legacy of the Bombay School of Sociology.’Sociological Bulletin, 62(2): 204–16.
25.
ParryJ.1994. Death in Banaras. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
ParryJ.1998. ‘Mauss, Dumont, and the Distinction Between Status and Power.’ In Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute, edited by JamesW. and AllenN.J., 151–72. Oxford: Berghahn Books.