In this article, I aim to show how Louis Dumont’s famous claim that ‘the condition for a sound development of Sociology of India is found in the establishment of the proper relation between it and classical Indology’ has become obsolete and was from the beginning a problematic postulate. I first develop the historical background of the denigration of anthropological approaches in India against the rise of an idealising Indology as a philological discipline. Then I discuss the structural, methodological and ideological problems that made it difficult to follow Dumont’s advice to search for the point of confluence of sociology and Indology. Finally, I place Dumont’s holistic approach in relation to the holistic structure of academic disciplines that emerged in the 19th century on the basis of the nation-state model and argue that it is misleading and reductive to think that ‘the construction of an Indian Sociology rests in part upon the existence of Indology’.
AdluriVishwa P. and BagcheeJoydeep2014. The Nay Science. A History of German Indology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AllenNicholas2000. ‘The Field and the Desk: Choices and Linkages.’ In Anthropologists in a Wider World, edited by DreschP., JamesW., and ParkinD., 243–57. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
3.
AppaduraiArjun. 1986. ‘Is Homo Hierarchicus?.’American Ethnologist, 13(4): 745–61.
4.
BerremanGerald D.1971. ‘The Brahmanical View of Caste.’Contributions to Indian Sociology, N.S.516–23.
5.
BéteilleAndre1964. ‘A Note on the Reference of Caste.’European Journal of Sociology, 5: 130–34.
6.
BühnemannGudrun1988. Pūjā. A Study in Smārta Ritual. Wien: Institut für Indologie der Universität Wien.
7.
BurghartRichard1990. ‘Ethnographers and Their Local Counterparts in India.’ In Localizing Strategies. Regional Traditions of Ethnographic Writing, edited by FardonR., 260–79. Edinburgh: Scottisch Academic Press; Washington: Smithosonian Institution Press.
8.
ChidesterDavid. 2014. Epire of Religion. Imperialism and Comparative Religion. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
9.
CohnBernard1955. ‘The Changing Status of a Depressed Caste.’ In Village India: Studies in the Little Community, edited by MariottM., 53–77. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
10.
CohnBernard1968. ‘Notes on the History of the Study of Indian Society and Culture.’ In Structure and Change in Indian Society, edited by SingerMilton and BernardCohn, 3–28. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
11.
CœurdouxPère G.-L.1777. Review of Sylvie Murr, Vol. 1: Moeurs et coutumes des Indiens (1777): Un inédit du Père G.-L. Coeurdoux, S.J. dans la version de N.-J. Desvaulx. Vol. II: L’Indologie du Père Coeurdoux (Paris: École Française d’Extrême-Orient, 1987).
12.
DasVeena1993. ‘Der anthropologische Diskurs über Indien: Die Vernunft und Ihr Anderes.’ In Kultur, Soziale Praxis Text: Die Krise der ethnographischen Repräsentation, edited by FuchsE. M.. Munich: Suhrkamp.
13.
De SmetRichard1990. Review of Sylvie Murr, Vol. 1: Moeurs et coutumes des Indiens (1777): Un inédit du Père G.-L. Coeurdoux, S.J. dans la version de N.-J. Desvaulx. Vol. II: L’Indologie du Père Coeurdoux (Paris: École Française d’Extrême-Orient, 1987). Indian Theological Studies, 27: 371–73.
14.
DirksNicholas. 2001. Castes of Mind. Colonialism and the Making of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
15.
DuboisJean Antoine1906. Description of the Character, Manners and Customs of the People of India, and of their Institutions, religious and civil, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
16.
DumontLouis. 1955. ‘Sociologie de l’Inde.’ In Annuaire de l’Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales.
17.
DumontLouis. 1957. Hierarchy and Marriage Alliance in South Indian Kinship. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.
18.
DumontLouis. 1964a. Une sous-caste de I’Inde du Sud. Organisation sociale et religieuse de Pramalai kallar. Paris-The Hague: Mouton.
19.
DumontLouis1964b. ‘Pour une sociologie de l’Inde.’ In: DumontL., La civilisation indienne est nous. Paris: Armand Colin.
20.
DumontLouis. 1966. ‘A Fundamental Problem in the Sociology of Caste.’Contributions to Indian Sociology, 9: 2–32.
21.
DumontLouis. 1980. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22.
DumontLouis. 1991. ‘Die Kaste und das Ganze. Gesellschaft, Religion und Individuum im Hinduismus.’Lettre international, 14: 58–62.
23.
DumontLouis and PocockD.. 1957. ‘For a Sociology of India.’Contribution to Indian Sociology (N.S.)17–22.
24.
EinooShingo. 1993. ‘Changes in Hindu Ritual: With a Focus on the Morning Service.’Senri Ethnological Studies, 36: 197–237.
25.
FullerChristoph. 1979. ‘Gods, Priests and Purity: On the Relation between Hinduism and the Caste System.’Man, 14: 459–76.
26.
FullerChristoph. 1984. Servants of the Goddess: The Priests of a South Indian Temple. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
GondaJan. 1980. Vedic Ritual. The Non-Solemn Rites. Leiden, Köln: Brill.
28.
GoughKathleen1955. ‘The Social Structure of a Tanjore Village.’ In Village India: Studies in the Little Community, edited by MarriottMcKim, 36–52. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
29.
GutschowNiels and MichaelsAxel. 2005. Handling Death. The Dynamics of Death and Ancestor Rituals among the Newars of Bhaktapur, Nepal. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
30.
GutschowNiels and MichaelsAxel. 2008. Growing Up – Hindu and Buddhist Initiation Rituals among Newar Children in Bhaktapur, Nepal. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
31.
GutschowNiels and MichaelsAxel. 2012. Getting Married – Hindu and Buddhist Marriage Rituals among Newars of Bhaktapur and Patan, Nepal. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
32.
HackerPaul1983. ‘Inklusivismus.’ In Inklusivismus: Eine indische Denkform, edited by OberhammerG., 11–28. Vienna: Institut für Indologie der Universität.
33.
HalbfassWilhelm1997. ‘Research and Reflection: Responses to my Respondents.’ In Beyond Orientalism. The Work of Wilhelm Halbfass and ist Impact on Indian and Cross-Cultural Studies, edited by FrancoE. and PreisendanzK., 1–25. Amsterdam, Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.
34.
HannederJürgen2012. ‘Präsenz und Philologie.’ In Präsenz Interdisziplinär. Kritik und Entfaltung einer Institution, edited by FielitzSonja, 288–303. Heidelberg: Winter.
35.
HeestermanJan. 1964. ‘Brahmin, Ritual, and Renouncer.’Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Süd- und Südostasiens, 8: 1–31.
36.
HeestermanJan. 1985. The Inner Conflict of Tradition: Essays in Indian Ritual, Kingship, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
HillebrandtAlfred. 1897. Ritual-Literatur. Vedische Opfer und Zauber. Straßburg: Karl J. Trübner.
38.
HöferAndrás1979. ‘On Re-reading Le Nepal: What We Social Scientists Owe to Sylvain Levi.’Kaislash, 7: 175–90.
39.
HumphreyCaroline and LaidlawJames1994. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual. A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
40.
IndenRonald. 1990. Imagining India. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
41.
KanePandurang Vaman1968–1974. History of Dharmaśāstra. 5 vols. Poona: Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute.
42.
KhareR.S., ed. 2006. Caste Hierarchy and Individualism: Indian Critiques of Louis Dumont’s Contributions. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
43.
KolendaPauline. 1985. Caste in Contemporary India: Beyond Organic Solidarity, 2nd ed. Prospects Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
44.
KolendaPauline. 2006. ‘Dumont Revisited’ (Review of Khare 2006). Economic and Political Weekly, 41(8): 4961–64.
45.
LardinoisRoland. 2013. Scholars and Prophets: Sociology of India from France in the 19th–20th Centuries. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
46.
MacaulayThomas Babington1835. Minute on Education: Bureau of Education. Selections from Educational Records, Part I (1781–1839). Edited by SharpH.. Calcutta: Superintendent, Government Printing, 1920. Reprint. Delhi: National Archives of India, 1965, 107–117. (Quoted from http://www.mssu.edu/projectsouthasia/history/primarydocs/education/Macaulay001.htm (last accessed 1December2019).
47.
MadanT.N.2011. Sociological Traditions Methods and Perspectives in the Sociology of India. New Delhi: SAGE.
48.
MalhotraR.2016. The Battle for Sanskrit: Is Sanskrit Political or Sacred, Oppressive or Liberating, Dead or Alive?Noida: HarperCollins.
49.
MarriottMcKim, ed. 1955. Village India: Studies in the Little Community. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
50.
MarriottMcKim, ed. 1968. ‘Multiple Reference in Indian Caste Systems.’ In Social Mobility in the Caste Systems in India: Comparative Studies in Society and History, edited by SilverbergJ., 103ff. The Hague, Paris: Mouton.
51.
MarriottMcKim, ed. 1990. India through Hindu Categories. New Delhi: SAGE.
52.
McGetchinDouglas T.2009. Indology, Indomania, and Orientalism: Ancient India’s Rebirth in Modern Germany. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
53.
MichaelsAxel. 2004a. Hinduism – Past and Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
54.
MichaelsAxel2004b. ‘Indology and the Cultural Turn.’ In Text and Context in the History, Literature and Religion of Orissa, edited by MalinarA., BeltzJ. and FreeseH., 457–81. Delhi: Manohar.
55.
MichaelsAxel. 2016. Homo ritualis. Hindu Rituals and Its Significance for Ritual Theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
MichaelsAxel2019. ‘Cultural hybridity and Transculturality.’ In Engaging Transculturality. Concepts, Key terms, Case Studies, edited by Abu-Er-RubLaila, BrosiusChristiane, MeurerSebastian, PanagiotopoulosDiamantis, RichterSusan, 3–14. London and New York: Routledge.
57.
MichaelsAxel. forthcoming. ‘Sheldon Pollock and German Indology.’ In Disciplines and Movements: The Circulation of Knowledge between India and the German-speaking World (1850–1950), edited by HarderH. and RainaD.. Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
58.
MichaelsAxel, and WulfChristoph, eds. 2020. Science and Scientification in South Asia and Europe. London, New Delhi: Routledge.
59.
MillJames. 1817. The History of India, 3 vols. London: Baldwin, Cradock & Joy.
60.
MüllerFriedrich Max1867. Chips from a German Workshop. Volume I: Essays on the Science of Religion. London: Longman, Green, and Co.
61.
MurrSylvie. 1987. Vol. 1: Moeurs et coutumes des Indiens (1777): Un inédit du Père G.-L. Coeurdoux, S.J. dans la version de N.-J. Desvaulx. Vol. II: L’Indologie du Père Coeurdoux. Paris: École Française d’Extrême-Orient.
62.
OldenbergHermann. 1906. Indien und die Religionswissenschaft. Zwei Vorträge. Stuttgart, Berlin: Cotta.
63.
ParryJonathan. 1979. Caste and Kinship in Kangra. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
64.
ParryJonathan. 1980. ‘Ghost, Greed and Sin: The Occupational Identity of the Benares Funeral Priests.’Man, N.S.1588–111.
65.
PatelSujata2010. ‘At Crossroads: Sociology in India.’ In The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions, edited by PatelS., 280–91. London: Sage.
66.
PollockSheldon2009. ‘Future Philology? The Fate of a Soft Science in a Hard World.’ In The Fate of the Disciplines. Special number (edited by ChandlerJ. and DavidsonA.) of Critical Inquiry, 35(4): 931–61.
67.
PollockSheldon. 2014. What Is South Asian Knowledge Good for?Heidelberg: South Asia Institute (South Asia Institute Papers 01).
68.
QuigleyDeclan. 1993. The Interpretation of Caste. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
69.
RahejaGloria Goodwin1988. The Poison in the Gift: Ritual, Prestation, and the Dominant Caste in a North Indian Village. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
70.
RahejaGloria Goodwin1989. ‘Centrality, Mutuality, and Hierarchy: Shifting Aspects of Inter-caste Relationships in North India.’Contributions to Indian Sociology23 (1): 79–101.
71.
RaiRavindra K.1986. ‘Social Anthropology of India: Theory and Method.’ In Survey of Research in Sociology and Social Anthropology, 1–50. New Delhi: Indian Council of Social Science Research.
72.
RenouLouis. 1936. ‘Sylvain Lévi et son oeuvre scientifique.’Journal Asiatique, 228: 1–59.
73.
SlajeWalter. 2003. ‘Was ist und welchem Zweck dient die Indologie.’Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 153(2): 311–31.
74.
SrinivasM.N.1972. Some Change in Modern India. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
75.
StaalFrits. 1979. ‘The Meaninglessness of Ritual.’Numen, 26: 2–22.
76.
StaalFrits. 1983. Agni: The Vedic Ritual of the Fire Altar, 2 Vols. Berkeley: University of California Press.
77.
SingerMilton, ed. 1972. ‘Text and Context in the Study of Contemporary Hinduism.’ In: idem, When a Great Tradition Modernizes: Text and Context in the Study of Hinduism, 39–54. New York, Washington, London: Praeger Publishers.
78.
SundarNandini, DeshpandeSatish and UberoiPatricia. 2000. ‘Indian Anthropology and Sociology: Towards a History.’Economic and Political Weekly, 35(24): 1998–2002.
79.
TachikawaMusashi. 1983. ‘A Hindu Worship Service in Sixteen Steps, Shoḍaṣa-Upacāra-Pūjā.’Bulletin of the National Museum of Ethnology, 8: 104–86.
80.
TachikawaMusashi, HinoShoun and DeodharLalita. 2001. Pūjā and Saṃskāra. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
81.
TambiahStanley. 1987. ‘At the Confluence of Anthropology, History, and Indology.’Contributions to Indian Sociology (N.S.)21187–216.
82.
TrautmannThomas. 2004. Aryans and British India. New Delhi: Yoda Press (Reprint of 1997).
83.
UberoiPatricia. 1995. ‘Problems with Patriarchy: Conceptual Issues in Anthropology and Feminism.’Sociological Bulletin, 44(2): 195–221.
84.
UberoiPatricia, SundarNandini and DeshpandeSatish, eds. 2007. Anthropology in the East. Founders of Indian Sociology and Anthropology. Delhi: Permanent Black.
85.
van der VeerPeter1989. ‘The Concept of the Ideal Brahman as an Indological Construct.’ In Hinduism Reconsidered, edited by SontheimerG.D. and KulkeH., 67–80. New Delhi: Manohar Publications.
