Drawing upon the court case of one woman sentenced for killing her infant in the early decades of the last century, this article reads Pierre Bourdieu’s insight on how the trial stages conflicts produced in the social realm as a paradox for explaining how British administrators and Indian village officials negotiated non-conflicting codes of sexual and moral conduct on the basis of colonial ideology and locally fixed caste hierarchies to convict women of infanticide. This article argues that a staging of women’s agency is crucial for understanding the colonial conferral of legal subjectivity and for a gendered critique of the Subaltern Studies paradigm of conflict or collaboration as ‘dominance without hegemony.’
AnagolPadma. 2002. ‘The Emergence of the Female Criminal in India: Infanticide and Survival Under the Raj.’History Workshop Journal53 (Spring): 73–93.
2.
AminShahid. 1987. ‘Approver’s Testimony, Judicial Discourse: The Case of Chauri Chaura.’ In Subaltern Studies V, edited by GuhaRanajit, 166–202. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
3.
BourdieuPierre. 1987. ‘The Force of Law: Towards a Sociology of the Juridical Field.’ Translated by Richard Terdiman. Hastings Law Journal38 (July): 805–53.
4.
CarrollLucy. 1989. ‘Law, Custom and Statutory Social Reform: The Hindu Widow’s Remarriage Act of 1856.’ In Women in Colonial India: Essays on Survival, Work, and the State, edited by KrishnamurthyJ., 1–26. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
5.
ChatterjeePartha. 1990. ‘The Nationalist Resolution of the Woman Question.’ In Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History, edited by SangariKumkumVaidS., 233–53. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
ClarkAlice. 1989. ‘Limitations of Female Life Chances in Rural Central Gujarat.’ In Women in Colonial India: Essays on Survival, Work, and the State, edited by KrishnamurtyJayasankar, 27–51. Delhi: Oxford.
7.
CohnBernard. 1961. ‘From Indian Status to British Contract.’Journal of Economic History21 (4): 613–28.
8.
CohnBernard. 1987. ‘The Command of Language and the Language of Command.’ In Subaltern Studies IV, edited by GuhaRanajit, 276–329. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
9.
CohnBernard. 1989. ‘Law and the Colonial State in India.’ In History and Power in the Study of Law: New Directions in Legal Anthropology, edited by StarrJuneCollierJane F., 57–75. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
10.
ComaroffJohn. 1995. ‘The Discourse of Rights in Colonial South Africa: Subjectivity, Sovereignty, Modernity.’ In Identities, Politics, and Rights, edited by SaratAustinKearnsThomas R., 193–236. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
11.
DerretJ.D.M.1961. ‘The Administration of Hindu Law by the British.’Comparative Studies in Society and History4 (1): 10–52.
12.
DerretJ.D.M.1968. Religion, Law and the State in India. London: Faber and Faber.
13.
DerretJ.D.M.1977. ‘J. H. Nelson: A Forgotten Administrator–Historian of India.’ In Essays in Classical and Modern Hindu Law. Volume II, edited by DerretJ.D.M., 404–23. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
14.
GaurMeena. 1989. Sati and Social Reforms in India. Jaipur: Sharan Books.
15.
GilmartinDavid. 1981. ‘Kinship, Women and Politics in 20th Century Punjab.’ In The Extended Family: Women and Political Participation in India and Pakistan, edited by MinaultGail, 251–73. Columbia: South Asia Books.
16.
GuhaRanajit. 1982. ‘On Some Apects of the Historiography of Colonial India.’ In Subaltern Studies I, edited by GuhaRanajit, 135–65. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
17.
GuhaRanajit. 1987. ‘Chandra’s Death.’ In Subaltern Studies V, edited by GuhaRanajit, 135–65. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
GuhaRanajit. 1990. ‘Dominance without Hegemony.’ In Subaltern Studies VI, edited by GuhaRanajit, 210–309. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
19.
KalpagamU.1992. ‘Colonising Power and Colonised Bodies.’Indian Journal of Social Science5 (1): 61–79.
20.
ManiLata. 1987. ‘Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India.’Cultural Critique7 (Fall): 119–56.
21.
ManiLata. 1990. ‘Contentious Traditions.’ In Recasting Women: Essays in Indian Colonial History, edited by SangariKumkumVaidSudesh, 88–126. NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22.
ManiLata. 1998. Contentious Traditions: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
23.
MayneJohn D.1861. Commentaries on the Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860). Madras: Higginbotham and Co.
24.
MayneJohn D.1862 (1861). Commentaries on the Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860). Madras: Higginbotham and Co, 2nd edition.
25.
MayneJohn D.1878 (1900). A Treatise on Hindu Law and Usage. Madras: Higginbotham and Co.
26.
MillerBarbara D.1981. Endangered Sex: Neglect of Female Children in Rural North India. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
NelsonJames Henry. 1869. Commentaries on the Code of Criminal Procedure. Madras: Higginbotham and Co.
28.
NelsonJames Henry. 1877. A View of the Hindu Law as Administered By the High Court of Judicature at Madras. Madras: Higginbotham and Co.
29.
MillerBarbara D.1887. Indian Usage and Judge-Made Law in Madras. London: London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Co.
30.
MillerBarbara D.1881. A Prospectus for the Scientific Study of the Hindu Law. Madras: Higginbotham and Co.
31.
O’HanlonRosalind. 1991. ‘Issues of Widowhood: Gender and Resistance in Colonial Western India.’ In Contesting Power: Resistance and Everyday Social Relations in South Asia, edited by HaynesDouglasPrakashGyan, 62–108. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
32.
OldenbergVeena Talwar. 1994. ‘The Roop Kanwar Case: Feminist Responses.’ In Sati, the Blessing and the Curse: The Burning of Wives in India, edited by HawleyJohn Stratton, 101–30. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
33.
OldenbergVeena Talwar. 2002. Dowry Murder: The Imperial Origins of a Cultural Crime. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
PanigrahiLalitha. 1972. British Social Policy and Female Infanticide in India. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
35.
PantRashmi. 2014. ‘Matrimonial Strategies among Peasant Women in Early 20th Century Garhwal.’Contributions to Indian Sociology48 (3): 357–81.
36.
PrasadNita Verma. 2008. ‘The Litigious Widow: Inheritance Disputes in Colonial North India, 1875–1911.’ In Behind the Veil: Resistance, Women and the Everyday in Colonial South Asia, edited by GhoshAnindita, 161–90. London: Palgrave.
37.
PrasadNita Verma. 2013, Winter. ‘Remaking Her Family for the Judges: Hindu Widows and Property Rights in the Colonial Courts of North India, 1875–1911.’ Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History14 (3). doi: 10.1353/cch.2013.0046
38.
SarkarTanika. 1993. ‘Rhetoric against Age of Consent: Resisting Colonial Reason and Death of a Child-Wife.’Economic & Political Weekly28 (36): 1869–78.
39.
SaxenaRajendra. 1975. Social Reforms: Infanticide and Sati. New Delhi: Trimurthi Publications.
40.
SenSatadru. 1999. ‘Rationing Sex: Female Convicts in the Andamans.’ South Asia30 (1): 29–59.
41.
SenSatadru. 2002. ‘The Savage Family: Colonialism and Female Infanticide in Nineteenth Century India.’Journal of Women’s History14 (3): 53–79.
42.
SinghaRadhika. 1998. A Despotism of Law: Crime and Justice in Early Colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
43.
SinhaMrinalini. 1992. ‘Chathams, Pitts, and Gladstones in Petticoats: The Politics of Gender and Race in the Illbert Bill Controversy, 1883–1884.’ In Western Women and Imperialism, edited by ChaudhuriNupurStroebelMargaret, 98–118. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
44.
SnehiYogesh. 2003. ‘Female Infanticide and Gender in Punjab: Imperial Claims and Contemporary Discourse.’Economic & Political Weekly38 (41): 4302–05;
45.
SnehiYogesh. 2011. ‘Female Feticide.’ In India Today: An Encyclopedia of Life in the Republic, Volume One, edited by KaminskyArnold P.LongRoger D., 242–43. Santa Barbara, CA: Abc-Clio.
46.
SturmanRachel. 2005, July. ‘Property and Attachments: Defining Autonomy and the Claims of Family in Nineteenth-century Western India.’ Comparative Studies in Society and History47 (3): 611–37.
47.
SturmanRachel. 2006. ‘Marriage and the Morality of Exchange: Defining the Terrain of Law in Late Nineteenth Century Western India.’ In Decentering Empire: Britain, India, and the Transcolonial World, edited by GhoshDurbaKennedyDane, 51–75. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
48.
TurnerVictor. 1986. The Anthropology of Performance. New York, NY: Performing Arts Publications.
49.
VishwanathL.S.1998. ‘Efforts of Colonial State to Suppress Female Infanticide: Use of Sacred Texts, Generation of Knowledge.’Economic & Political Weekly33 (19): 1104–12.
50.
VishwanathL.S.2004. ‘Female Infanticide: The Colonial Experience.’Economic & Political Weekly39 (22): 2313–18.
51.
WashbrookDavid. 1981. ‘Law, State and Agrarian Society in Colonial India.’Modern Asian Studies15 (3): 649–721.
52.
YangAnand A.1992. ‘Whose Sati? Widow Burning in Early 19th Century India.’ In Expanding the Boundaries of Women’s History: Essays on Women in the Third World, edited by Johnson-OdimCherylStrobelMargaret, 74–98. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
