Drawing on multi-sited ethnographic fieldwork in Hyderabad, South India, this article explores the relationship between charity and disability. Despite a stereotype of philanthropic aid as reproductive of existing power structures or symptomatic of state failures to eliminate poverty, closer investigation exposes a more multi-layered picture. Disjunctures in donor and recipient perspectives on charity are shown to create spaces in which recipients might challenge the very characterisations that allow them access to aid in the first place, revealing both the potential and the limitations of charitable aid to bring about social change for disabled people.
Abu-LughodLila. 1990. ‘The Romance of Resistance: Tracing Transformations of Power Through Bedouin Women.’American Ethnologist17 (1): 41–55.
2.
AnandPriya.2004. ‘Hindu Diaspora and Religious Philanthropy in the United States.’ Paper presented at the 6th International Society for Third Sector Research Toronto, July2004.
3.
AtkinsonB.2000. The Essential Writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York, NY: Modern Library Classics.
4.
BaileyWellesley C. n.d. The Lepers of Our Indian Empire: A Visit to Them in 1890–91. London: John F. Shaw & Co.
BaumanC.2008. Christian Identity and Dalit Religion in Hindu India, 1868–1947. Michigan, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Limited.
7.
BenthallJ.Bellion-JourdanJ.2003. The Charitable Crescent: Politics of Aid in the Muslim World. London: I. B. Tauris and Co Ltd.
8.
BergerR.2004. ‘Pushing Forward: Disability, Basketball, and Me.’Qualitative Inquiry10 (5): 794–810.
9.
BornsteinErica. 2012. Disquieting Gifts: Humanitarianism in New Delhi. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
10.
BridsonT.1951. Lightening the Leper’s Load. London: Salvationist Publishing and Supplies.
11.
BruunFrank Jarle. 1995. ‘Hero, Beggar, or Sports Star: Negotiating the Identity of the Disabled Person in Nicaragua.’ In Disability and Culture, edited by IngstadBenedicteWhyteSusan Reynolds, 196–209. London: University of California Press.
12.
BusbyCecilia. 1997. ‘Permeable and Partible Persons: A Comparative Analysis of Gender and Body in South India and Melanesia.’The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute3 (2): 261–78.
13.
CaplanLionel. 1999. ‘Gifting and Receiving: Anglo-Indian Charity and Its Beneficiaries in Madras.’ In Tradition, Pluralism and Identity: In Honour of T. N. Madan, edited by DasV.GuptaD.UberoiP., 283–305. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
CochraneR.G.1927. Leprosy in India: A Survey. London: World Dominion Press.
16.
ColeridgePeter. 1993. Disability, Liberation and Development. Oxford: Oxfam Publishing.
17.
DasVeenaAddlakhaRenu. 2001. ‘Disability and Domestic Citizenship: Voice, Gender, and the Making of the Subject.’Public Culture13 (3): 511–31.
18.
Du BoisW.E.B. 1986. Dusts of Dawn. New York, NY: Library of America.
19.
DubeSaraubh. 2004. Stitches on Time: Colonial Textures and Postcolonial Tangles. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
20.
DumontLouis. 1970. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
21.
FarmerPaul. 2005. Pathologies of Power: Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
FeatherstoneMichael. 1991. ‘The Body in Consumer Culture.’ In The Body: Social Process and Cultural Theory, edited by FeatherstoneM.HepworthM.TurnerB.S., 170–96. London: SAGE Publications.
23.
FeiermanS.1998. ‘Reciprocity and Assistance in Precolonial Africa.’ In Philanthropy in the World’s Traditions, edited by IlchmanW.F.KatzS.N.QueenE.L., 3–24. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
24.
FlaniganS.T.2006. ‘Charity as Resistance: Connections Between Charity, Contentious Politics, and Terror.’Studies in Conflict and Terrorism29 (7): 641–55.
25.
FoucaultMichel. 1989. The Birth of the Clinic. London: Routledge.
26.
FrenchLindsay. 1994. ‘The Political Economy of Injury and Compassion: Amputees on the Thai–Cambodia Border.’ In Embodiment and Experience, edited by CsordasT.J., 69–99. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27.
FroererPeggy. 2007. Religious Division and Social Conflict: The Emergence of Hindu Nationalism in Rural India. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
28.
GoerdtA.1984. Physical Disability in Barbados: A Cultural Perspective. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
29.
HardimanDavid. 1987. The Coming of Devi: Adivasi Assertion in Western India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
30.
HelanderB.1995. ‘Disability as Incurable Illness: Health, Process, and Personhood in Southern Somalia.’ In Disability and Culture, edited by IngstadB.WhyteS.R., 73–93. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
IlchmanW.F.KatzS.N.QueenE.L., eds. 1998. Philanthropy in the World’s Traditions. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
32.
JuergensmeyerMarkDarrinMcMahon M.1998. ‘Hindu Philanthropy and Civil Society.’ In Philanthropy in the World’s Traditions, edited by IlchmanW.F.KatzS.QueenE.L., 263–78. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
33.
KentA.2004. ‘Divinity, Miracles and Charity in the Sathya Sai Baba Movement of Malaysia.’Ethnos69 (1): 43–62.
34.
KooimanD.1991. ‘Conversion from Slavery to Plantation Labour: Christian Mission in South India (19th Century).’Social Scientist19 (8–9): 57–71.
35.
LambSarah. 1997. ‘The Making and Unmaking of Persons: Notes on Aging and Gender in North India.’Ethos25 (3): 279–302.
36.
LewisDavid. 2004. ‘On the Difficulty of Studying “Civil Society”: NGOs, State and Democracy in Bangladesh.’Contributions to Indian Sociology38 (3): 299–322.
37.
LivingstoneR.BentonG.1975. Karl Marx: Early Writings. London: Pelican Books.
38.
LuhrmannT.M.1996. The Good Parsi: The Fate of a Colonial Elite in a Postcolonial Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
MarriottMcKim. 1976. ‘Hindu Transactions: Diversity Without Dualism.’ In Structure and Change in Indian Society, edited by KapfererBruce, 109–42. Philapdelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.
40.
MarriottMcKim. 1989. ‘Constructing an Indian Ethnosociology.’Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.) 23 (1): 1–39.
41.
MaussMarcel. 1954. The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
42.
MehrotraNilika. 2011. ‘Disability Rights Movements in India: Politics and Practice.’Economic & Political Weekly46 (6): 65–72.
43.
MendelsohnO.BaxiU., eds. 1994. The Rights of Subordinated People. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
44.
MilesMiles. 2002. ‘Disability on a Different Model: Glimpses of an Asian Heritage.’Journal of Religion, Disability and Health6 (2–3): 89–108.
45.
MinesMattison. 1988. ‘Conceptualizing the Person: Hierarchical Society and Individual Autonomy in India.’American Anthropologist90 (3): 568–79.
46.
MinesMattison. 1994. Public Faces, Private Voices: Community and Individuality in South India. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
47.
MinesMattisonGourishankarVijayalakshmi. 1990. ‘Leadership and Individuality in South Asia: The Case of the South Indian Big-man.’The Journal of Asian Studies49 (4): 761–86.
48.
MosseDavid. 2005. Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London and Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
49.
MurphyRobert. 1995. ‘Encounters: The Body Silent in America.’ In Disability and Culture, edited by IngstadB.WhyteS.R., 140–58. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
OrtnerSherry B.1995. ‘Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal.’Comparative Studies in Society and History37 (1): 173–93.
51.
ParryJonathan. 1986. ‘The Gift, the Indian Gift and the “Indian Gift”.’Man21 (3): 453–73.
52.
ParryJonathan. 1991. ‘The Hindu Lexicographer? A Note on Auspiciousness and Purity.’Contributions to Indian Sociology (n.s.) 25 (2): 267–85.
53.
PoppendieckJanet. 1999. Sweet Charity? Emergency Food and the End of Entitlement. New York, NY: Viking.
54.
PriestleyMark. 2003. Disability: A Life Course Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
55.
ScottJames. 1990. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
56.
SentumbweNayinda. 1995. ‘Sighted Lovers and Blind Husbands: Experiences of Women in Uganda.’ In Disability and Culture, edited by IngstadB.WhyteS.R., 174–95. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
57.
ShapiroJ.P.1993. No Pity: People with Disabilities Forging a New Civil Rights Movement. New York, NY: Times Books.
58.
SpencerJonathan. 1997. ‘Fatima and the Enchanted Toffees: An Essay on Contingency, Narrative and Therapy.’Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute3 (4): 693–710.
59.
StaplesJames. 2003. ‘Disguise, Revelation and Copyright: Disassembling the South Indian Leper.’Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute9 (2): 295–315.
60.
StaplesJames. 2004. ‘Delineating Disease: Self-management of Leprosy Identities in South India.’Medical Anthropology23 (1): 69–88.
61.
StaplesJames. 2007a. Peculiar People, Amazing Lives: Leprosy, Social Exclusion and Community Making in South India. Delhi: Orient Longman.
62.
StaplesJames. 2007b. Livelihoods at the Margins: Surviving the City. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
63.
StaplesJames. 2007c. ‘When Things are Not as They Seem: Untangling the Webs That Hold Together a South Indian NGO.’ In Negotiating Boundaries and Borders: Qualitative Research On, In and For Development, edited by SmithM., 131–53. London: Elsevier.
64.
StaplesJames. 2007d. ‘The “Leper” and the State in South India.’Economic & Political Weekly42 (5): 437–43.
65.
StaplesJames. 2012a. ‘Suicide in South Asia: Ethnographic Perspectives.’Contributions to Indian Sociology46 (1–2): 1–28.
66.
StaplesJames. 2012b. ‘The Suicide Niche: Accounting for Self-harm in a South Indian Leprosy Colony.’Contributions to Indian Sociology46 (1–2): 117–44.
67.
StaplesJames. 2014. ‘Putting Indian Christianities into Context: Biographies of Christian Conversion in a Leprosy Colony.’Modern Asian Studies48(4): 1134–59.
68.
StaplesJames. 2015. ‘Personhood, Agency and Suicide in a Neo-liberalising South India.’ In Suicide and Agency: Anthropological Perspectives on Self-destruction, Personhood and Power, edited by BrozLudekMuensteDaniel, 27–46.Farnham: Ashgate.
69.
StaplesJamesWidgerTom. 2012. ‘Situating Suicide as an Anthropological Problem: Ethnographic Approaches to Understanding Self-harm and Self-inflicted Death.’Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry36 (2): 183–203.
70.
StikerHenri-Jacques. 1982. Corps infirmes et sociétés [Disabled Bodies and Society]. Paris: Aubier Montaigne.
71.
TierneyS.2001. ‘A Reluctance to be Defined “Disabled”: How Can the Social Model of Disability Enhance Understanding of Anorexia?’Disability & Society16 (5): 749–64.
72.
TigheC.A.2001. ‘“Working at Disability”: A Qualitative Study of the Meaning of Health and Disability for Women with Physical Impairments.’Disability & Society16 (4): 511–29.
73.
TurnerBryan S.1996. The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. London: SAGE Publications.
74.
Van RooyA. 1998. Civil Society and the Aid Industry. London: Earthscan.
75.
WendellS.1995. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York, NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
76.
WhiteD.L.1991. ‘From Crisis to Community Definition: The Dynamics of Eighteenth Century Parsi Philanthropy.’Modern Asian Studies25: 303–20.
77.
WhyteSusan Reynolds. 1995. ‘Disability Between Discourse and Experience.’ In Disability and Culture, edited by IngstadB.WhyteS.R., 267–91. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
