In contrast to a preoccupation with Nayar matriliny, in this article I look at the transformations of matrilineal tharavad houses among the Thiyyas who ranked below the Nayars in the caste hierarchy and were not generally large landowners. Moving away from the more exotic practices of matrilocality and duolocality, I look at matriliny coupled with a strong norm of virilocality in which a woman moved to her husband’s house after marriage. This enables an exploration of the implications of this residence norm for women, and particularly its implications for our understanding of the transformation of matrilineal kinship in Kerala. Paying special attention to the experience of women in tharavad houses and the creation of new houses, coupled with the continuities in the right that a woman retains to residence in her natal house and a right to a share of the property, forces us to question the common sense understanding that matriliny has transformed to patriliny.
AberleDavid F.1961. ‘Matrilineal Descent in Cross Cultural Perspective.’ In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by SchneiderD.M.GoughE.K., 655–727. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
2.
AbrahamJanaki. 2007. ‘Gender, Status and Class: A Sociological Study of the Thiyyas.’ PhD dissertation, Delhi University, New Delhi.
3.
AbrahamJanaki. 2011. ‘Why Did You Send Me Like This? Marriage, Matriliny and the “Providing Husband” in North Kerala, India.’Asian Journal of Women’s Studies17 (2): 32–65.
4.
ArunimaG.1996. ‘Multiple Meanings: Changing Conceptions of Matrilineal Kinship in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-century Malabar.’The India Economic and Social History Review33 (3): 283–307.
5.
ArunimaG.2003. There Comes Papa: Colonialism and the Transformation of Matriliny in Malabar, Kerala. C. 1850–1940. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
6.
BlackwoodEvelyn. 1999. ‘Big Houses and Small Houses: Doing Matriliny in West Sumatra.’Ethnos64 (1): 32–56.
7.
De CerteauMichel. 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
8.
DubeLeela. 1996. ‘Who Gains from Matriliny? Men, Women and Change on a Lakshadweep Island.’ In Shifting Circles of Support: Contextualising Kinship and Gender in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, edited by PalriwalaRajniRisseeuwCarla, 157–89. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
9.
DubeLeela. 2009 [1997]. Women and Kinship: Perspectives on Gender in South and South-East Asia. New Delhi: Rawat Publications (Earlier published by United Nations University Press).
10.
FortesMeyer. 1949. ‘Time and Social Structure: An Ashanti Case Study.’ In Time and Social Structure and Other Essays, 1–32. London: Athlone Press.
11.
FortesMeyer. 1972. Kinship and the Social Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
FullerC.J.1976. The Nayars Today. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
GoodenoughW.1951. Property, Kin and Community on Truk. Yale: Yale University Publications in Anthropology.
14.
GoodenoughW.1956. ‘Residence Rules.’Southwestern Journal of Anthropology12 (1): 22–37.
15.
GoughKathleen E.
(then KathleenE. Miller). 1950. Changes in Matrilineal Kinship on the Malabar Coast. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
16.
GoughKathleen E.1961a. ‘Tiyyar: North Kerala.’ In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by SchneiderDavid M.GoughE. Kathleen, 404–14. Berkley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
17.
GoughKathleen E.1961b. ‘Nayar: Central Kerala; Nayar: North Kerala; The Modern Disintegration of Matrilineal Descent Groups.’ In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by SchneiderDavid M.GoughKathleen, 298–384. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
18.
GoughKathleen E.1973. ‘Kinship and Marriage in Southwest India.’Contributions to Indian Sociology7 (1): 104–34.
19.
GoughKathleen E.1975. ‘Changing Households in Kerala.’ In Explorations in the Family and Other Essays, edited by NarainDhirendra, 218–67. Bombay: Thacker and Company.
20.
GundertHermann. 1995 [1872]. A Malayalam-English Dictionary. Kottayam: D.C. Books.
21.
JefferyRobin. 1993 [1992]. Politics, Women and Well-being: How Kerala Became ‘A Model’. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
22.
KarveIrawati. 1965. Kinship Organization in India. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.
23.
KodothPraveena. 2001a. ‘Courting Legitimacy or Delegitimizing Custom? Sexuality, Sambandham, and Marriage Reform in Late Nineteenth-century Malabar.’Modern Asian Studies35 (2): 349–84.
24.
KodothPraveena. 2001b. ‘Gender, Family and Property Rights: Questions from Kerala’s Land Reforms.’Indian Journal of Gender Studies8 (2): 291–306.
25.
KodothPraveena. 2002. ‘Framing Custom, Directing Practices: Authority, Property and Matriliny under Colonial Law in Nineteenth Century Malabar.’ Working Papers 338, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, India.
26.
MMCR. 2004. ‘Shifting the Ground of Fatherhood: Matriliny, Men and Marriage in Early Twentieth Century Malabar.’ Working Paper no. 359, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandrum, India.
27.
MenonVineetha. 2012. ‘Matriliny, Patriliny and the Postmodern Condition: Complexities of “Family” in Kerala.’Journal of Comparative Family Studies43 (1): 41–51.
28.
MMCR. 1891. Report of the Malabar Marriage Commission. Madras: Lawrence Asylum Press.
29.
MooreMelinda. 1985. ‘A New Look at the Nayar Tharavad.’Man (N.S.)20 (3): 523–41.
30.
MorganH.L.1877. Ancient Society. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
31.
NikaneChie. 1962. ‘The Nayar Family in a Disintegrating Matrilineal System’. International Journal of Comparative Sociology3 (1): 17–28.
32.
OsellaCaroline. 2012. ‘Desires under Reform: Contemporary Reconfigurations of Family, Marriage, Love and Gendering in a Transnational South Indian Matrilineal Muslim Community.’Culture and Religion13 (2): 241–64.
33.
PeletzMichael G.1995. ‘Neither Reasonable Nor Responsible: Contrasting Representations of Masculinity in a Malay Society’, In Bewitching Women, Pious Men: Gender and Body Politics in Southeast Asia, edited by OngAihwaPeletzMichael G.76–123. London: University of California Press.
34.
PetersPauline E.1997. ‘Revisiting the Puzzle of Matriliny in South-Central Africa.’ Critique of Anthropology17 (2): 125–46.
35.
Radcliffe-BrownA.R.1950. ‘Introduction.’ In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, edited by Radcliffe-BrownA.R.FordeD., 1–85. London: Oxford University Press.
36.
RadhakrishnanP.1989. Peasant Struggles, Land Reforms and Social Change: Malabar, 1836–1982. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
37.
RichardsAudrey I.1950. ‘Some Types of Family Structure Amongst the Central Bantu.’ In African Systems of Kinship and Marriage, edited by Radcliffe-BrownA.R.FordeC.F.London: Oxford University Press.
38.
SaradamoniK.1996. ‘Women’s Rights and the Decline of Matriliny in Southern India.’ In Shifting Circles of Support: Contextualising Kinship and Gender in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, edited by PalriwalaRajniRisseeuwCarla. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
39.
SaradamoniK.1999. Matriliny Transformed: Family, Law and Ideology in Twentieth Century Travancore. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
40.
SchneiderDavid M.1961. ‘Introduction: The Distinctive Features of Matrilineal Descent Groups’, In Matrilineal Kinship, edited by SchneiderDavid M.GoughKathleen, 1–29. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
41.
ShahA.M.1998. Family in India: Critical Essays. New Delhi: Orient Longman.
42.
UylMarion den. 2000. ‘Kinship and Gender Identity: Some Notes on Marumakkathayam in Kerala.’ In Culture, Creation, and Procreation: Concepts of Kinship in South Asian Practice, edited by BöckMonikaRaoAparna. New York, NY and Oxford: Berghahn Books.
